The Centre for Family Medicine Family Health Team, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Palliat Care. 2021 Oct;36(4):224-233. doi: 10.1177/0825859720973937. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Lack of tools to support advance care planning (ACP) has been identified as a significant barrier to implementing these discussions.
We pilot tested an ACP framework tool for use with persons living with dementia (PLWD) in primary care-based memory clinics and an Adult Day Program; this study describes user and recipient experiences with this framework.
We used a mixed methods approach. Health professionals completed an online survey following pilot testing and PLWD and substitute decision makers (SDM) completed survey immediately following the ACP discussion assessing their satisfaction (5-point scale) with the framework and exploring potential outcomes. Interviews with health professionals, PLWD, and SDM were conducted to gather more in-depth information on their perceptions of the ACP framework/ discussion.
Surveys were completed by 12 health professionals, 13 PLWD, and 16 SDM. While PLWD and SDM were satisfied with the ACP discussion (M = 4.0/5), health professionals were minimally satisfied with the ease of use of the framework (M = 2.0/5), acceptability for patients (M = 2.4/5) and feasibility in practice (M = 1.9/5). Sixteen interviews were completed with 8 health professionals, 1 PLWD, and 7 SDM. While health professionals valued ACP, lack of time and training were identified barriers to framework use. SDM felt better prepared for future decisions and PLWD were put at ease, knowing that their wishes for care were understood.
PLWD and SDM value the opportunity for ACP, and although health professionals identified some concerns with framework administration, they acknowledge the value and importance of ACP. Continuing efforts to refine ACP processes are justified.
缺乏支持预先医疗照护计划(ACP)的工具被认为是实施这些讨论的一个重大障碍。
我们在基层医疗记忆诊所和成人日间护理计划中试用了一个用于痴呆症患者(PLWD)的 ACP 框架工具;本研究描述了该框架在用户和接受者中的使用体验。
我们采用混合方法。在试点测试后,医疗保健专业人员完成了在线调查,PLWD 和替代决策人(SDM)在 ACP 讨论后立即完成调查,评估他们对框架的满意度(5 分制)并探索潜在结果。对医疗保健专业人员、PLWD 和 SDM 进行了访谈,以更深入地了解他们对 ACP 框架/讨论的看法。
共完成了 12 名医疗保健专业人员、13 名 PLWD 和 16 名 SDM 的调查。虽然 PLWD 和 SDM 对 ACP 讨论感到满意(M = 4.0/5),但医疗保健专业人员对框架的易用性满意度较低(M = 2.0/5),对患者的可接受性(M = 2.4/5)和在实践中的可行性(M = 1.9/5)。共完成了 16 次访谈,其中包括 8 名医疗保健专业人员、1 名 PLWD 和 7 名 SDM。虽然医疗保健专业人员重视 ACP,但缺乏时间和培训被认为是使用框架的障碍。SDM 对未来决策有更好的准备,PLWD 也感到安心,因为他们的护理意愿得到了理解。
PLWD 和 SDM 重视 ACP 的机会,尽管医疗保健专业人员对框架管理存在一些担忧,但他们承认 ACP 的价值和重要性。有理由继续努力完善 ACP 流程。