• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

屏障与社区教育在纽约市哈莱姆社区定期眼科检查依从性中的作用

The Role of Barriers and Community-Based Education in Compliance to Regular Eye Exams in New York City's Harlem Community.

作者信息

Moumneh Khaled, Centeno Gavica Jenifer, Centeno Gavica Mishelle S, Terrell Mark, Lomiguen Christine M

机构信息

Primary Care, Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine, New York, USA.

Medical Education, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Erie, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Oct 10;12(10):e10875. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10875.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.10875
PMID:33178528
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7652358/
Abstract

Background The American Optometric Association (AOA) recommends adults between the ages of 18 to 65 have an eye exam every two years while older individuals or those who utilize vision correction should have yearly exams. Previous vision screenings throughout New York City's Harlem community determined that 60% warranted referral to an ophthalmologist.  Objective As delayed vision screening could potentially leave a sight-threatening condition undiagnosed for many years, the objective of this study was to identify barriers to regular eye examinations. Methods A voluntary anonymous survey was verbally administered and recorded at free medical student-run vision screenings throughout multiple Harlem community health fairs. Data gathered included demographics, insurance coverage, comfort with an eye exam, and knowledge associated with an ophthalmologist eye exam. As a strategy to curtail the frequency of non-compliance to regular eye examinations, all participants were then educated about knowledge of ocular examinations and assured about uncertainties. Comfort levels were remeasured after education to determine the effectiveness and impact of community-based education. Results One hundred surveys fit the inclusion criteria. Of the participants with suboptimal knowledge of an eye exam (n=41), 32% were more comfortable after education and assurance versus 3% of the optimal knowledge participants (n=59). Of the participants with non-compliance to regular eye exams (n=39), 41% had suboptimal knowledge and 23% were more comfortable after education versus 33% and 10% of the compliant participants (n=61), respectively. Participants with suboptimal knowledge were 20.9% more likely to be noncompliant with regular eye examinations and at the same time, 18.1% more likely to have increased comfort after education and assurance than those with optimal knowledge. Of the participants without medical insurance (n=15), 67% were noncompliant with regular eye examinations and 60% had suboptimal knowledge versus 34% and 38% of the insured participants (n=85), respectively. Participants with medical insurance were 23.8% more likely to be compliant with regular eye examinations than those without medical insurance. Conclusion Measured perceptions of ophthalmology in New York City's Harlem community solidifies a lack of education as a clear barrier against proper vision care. Lack of health insurance coverage also contributed to decreased participation in regular eye examinations but to a lesser extent than education. These results suggest that empowering people through education can significantly improve compliance with regularly scheduled eye exams, thus improving the overall visual health of this minority-rich community.

摘要

背景

美国验光协会(AOA)建议18至65岁的成年人每两年进行一次眼部检查,而年龄较大的人或使用视力矫正的人应每年进行检查。此前在纽约市哈莱姆社区进行的视力筛查确定,60%的人需要转诊至眼科医生处。

目的

由于视力筛查延迟可能会使威胁视力的疾病多年未被诊断出来,本研究的目的是确定定期眼部检查的障碍。

方法

在多个哈莱姆社区健康集市上,由医学生免费进行的视力筛查中,以口头方式进行了一项自愿匿名调查并记录。收集的数据包括人口统计学信息、保险覆盖情况、对眼部检查的舒适度以及与眼科医生眼部检查相关的知识。作为减少不遵守定期眼部检查频率的一项策略,随后向所有参与者传授眼部检查知识并消除他们的疑虑。教育后重新测量舒适度,以确定基于社区的教育的有效性和影响。

结果

100份调查问卷符合纳入标准。在对眼部检查知识掌握欠佳的参与者(n = 41)中,32%的人在接受教育和得到保证后感觉更舒适,而知识掌握良好的参与者(n = 59)中这一比例为3%。在不遵守定期眼部检查的参与者(n = 39)中,41%的人知识掌握欠佳,23%的人在接受教育后感觉更舒适,而遵守检查的参与者(n = 61)中这两个比例分别为33%和10%。知识掌握欠佳的参与者不遵守定期眼部检查的可能性比知识掌握良好的参与者高20.9%,同时,在接受教育和得到保证后感觉更舒适的可能性比后者高18.1%。在没有医疗保险的参与者(n = 15)中,67%的人不遵守定期眼部检查,60%的人知识掌握欠佳,而有保险的参与者(n = 85)中这两个比例分别为34%和38%。有医疗保险的参与者遵守定期眼部检查的可能性比没有医疗保险的参与者高23.8%。

结论

在纽约市哈莱姆社区对眼科的认知调查结果表明,缺乏教育是获得适当视力保健的明显障碍。缺乏医疗保险覆盖也导致定期眼部检查的参与率下降,但程度低于教育因素。这些结果表明,通过教育增强人们的能力可以显著提高对定期眼部检查的依从性,从而改善这个少数民族聚居社区的整体视觉健康。

相似文献

1
The Role of Barriers and Community-Based Education in Compliance to Regular Eye Exams in New York City's Harlem Community.屏障与社区教育在纽约市哈莱姆社区定期眼科检查依从性中的作用
Cureus. 2020 Oct 10;12(10):e10875. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10875.
2
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): optometric exam improves access and utilization of eye care services.曼哈顿视力筛查和随访研究(NYC-SIGHT):验光检查可改善眼科保健服务的可及性和利用率。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 May;262(5):1619-1631. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-06344-2. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
Vision Screenings and Ophthalmology Referrals Among a Sample of Pediatricians in Florida.佛罗里达州儿科医生样本中的视力筛查与眼科转诊
Cureus. 2024 May 1;16(5):e59473. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59473. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study in Vulnerable Populations: 1-Month Feasibility Results.曼哈顿弱势群体视力筛查和随访研究:1 个月可行性研究结果。
Curr Eye Res. 2021 Oct;46(10):1597-1604. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1905000. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
5
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Vision and refractive error results.曼哈顿视力筛查与随访研究(纽约市视力研究):视力和屈光不正结果
Clin Exp Optom. 2025 Mar;108(2):183-190. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2024.2322523. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
6
The Vision Detroit Project: Integrated Screening and Community Eye-Health Education Interventions Improve Eyecare Awareness.底特律视觉项目:综合筛查和社区眼保健教育干预措施提高了眼保健意识。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2023 Aug;30(4):367-375. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2022.2127785. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
7
Characteristics Associated with Barriers to Eye Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey at a Free Vision Screening Event.与眼科保健障碍相关的特征:在一次免费视力筛查活动中的横断面调查。
Ophthalmic Res. 2023;66(1):170-178. doi: 10.1159/000526875. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
8
The Vision Detroit Project: Visual Burden, Barriers, and Access to Eye Care in an Urban Setting.底特律视觉项目:城市环境中的视觉负担、障碍和眼部护理的可及性。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022 Feb;29(1):13-24. doi: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1884264. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
9
Community-based vision health screening with on-site definitive exams: Design and outcomes.基于社区的视力健康筛查及现场确诊检查:设计与结果
Cogent Med. 2018;5. doi: 10.1080/2331205X.2018.1560641. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
10
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Subanalysis of Referral to Ophthalmology.曼哈顿视力筛查和随访研究(NYC-SIGHT):转诊至眼科的亚分析。
Curr Eye Res. 2024 Feb;49(2):197-206. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2023.2269614. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-Up Study: (NYC-SIGHT)Tele-Retinal Image Findings and Importance of Photography.曼哈顿视力筛查与随访研究:(纽约市视力研究)远程视网膜图像结果及摄影的重要性。
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Mar;30(3):664-676. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0134. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Baseline Results and Costs of a Cluster-Randomized Trial.曼哈顿视力筛查和随访研究(NYC-SIGHT):一项整群随机试验的基线结果和成本。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;251:12-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.01.019. Epub 2023 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Establishing a Vision and Eye Health Surveillance System for the Nation: A Status Update on the Vision and Eye Health Surveillance System.为国家建立视力与眼健康监测系统:视力与眼健康监测系统的最新进展
Ophthalmology. 2018 Apr;125(4):471-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.10.014.
2
Barriers to and Suggestions on Improving Utilization of Eye Care in High-Risk Individuals: Focus Group Results.高危个体眼保健利用的障碍与改善建议:焦点小组结果
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Oct 15;2014:527831. doi: 10.1155/2014/527831. eCollection 2014.
3
Effectiveness of a medical student-organized community vision screening initiative.一项由医学生组织的社区视力筛查倡议的成效
Med Health R I. 2010 Aug;93(8):239, 242-3.
4
Patient-physician relationships and racial disparities in the quality of health care.医患关系与医疗保健质量方面的种族差异。
Am J Public Health. 2003 Oct;93(10):1713-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.10.1713.
5
Community screening for eye disease by laypersons: the Hoffberger program.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;133(3):386-92. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(01)01380-0.