Mayer Lukas, Grams Astrid, Freyschlag Christian F, Gummerer Maria, Knoflach Michael
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ann Transl Med. 2020 Oct;8(19):1268. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3169.
Acute occlusion of the internal carotid artery is the underlying etiology in 4 to 15% of all ischemic strokes. The clinical presentation varies considerably ranging from asymptomatic occlusion to severe ischemic strokes. Substantial differences in the acute management of acute symptomatic internal carotid artery occlusions (ICAO) exists between centers. Thusly, we comprised a narrative review of the natural course of acute ICAO and of available treatment options [i.v. thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy and stenting, bypass between the superficial temporal and the middle cerebral arteries (MCA) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA)]. We found that very few randomized treatment trials have been performed in patients acute symptomatic ICAO. Most evidence stems from case series and observational studies. Especially in older studies the intracranial vessel status has rarely been considered. After revision of these studies we concluded that the mainstay of the acute management of acute symptomatic ICAO is i.v. thrombolysis when applied within the label and in combination with mechanical thrombectomy in case of intracranial large vessel occlusion. In cases without intracranial large vessel occlusion mechanical thrombectomy of acute ICAO is associated with a risk of distal embolization. More research on prognostic parameters is needed to better characterize the risk of decompensation of collateral flow and to better define the time-window of intervention. When mechanical thrombectomy fails or is not available, surgical approaches are an alternative in selected patients.
在所有缺血性卒中中,颈内动脉急性闭塞是4%至15%病例的潜在病因。临床表现差异很大,从无症状闭塞到严重缺血性卒中不等。各中心在急性症状性颈内动脉闭塞(ICAO)的急性处理方面存在很大差异。因此,我们对急性ICAO的自然病程和可用治疗选择[静脉溶栓、血管内血栓切除术和支架置入术、颞浅动脉与大脑中动脉(MCA)之间的搭桥术以及颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)]进行了叙述性综述。我们发现,针对急性症状性ICAO患者进行的随机治疗试验很少。大多数证据来自病例系列和观察性研究。特别是在早期研究中,很少考虑颅内血管状况。在对这些研究进行修订后,我们得出结论,急性症状性ICAO急性处理的主要方法是在适应证范围内进行静脉溶栓,对于颅内大血管闭塞的情况,可联合机械取栓术。在无颅内大血管闭塞的情况下,急性ICAO的机械取栓术存在远端栓塞风险。需要对预后参数进行更多研究,以更好地描述侧支循环失代偿的风险,并更好地确定干预的时间窗。当机械取栓失败或无法进行时,手术方法是部分患者的替代选择。