Rangel-Castilla Leonardo, Rajah Gary B, Shakir Hakeem J, Shallwani Hussain, Gandhi Sirin, Davies Jason M, Snyder Kenneth V, Levy Elad I, Siddiqui Adnan H
Departments of 1 Neurosurgery.
Department of Neurosurgery, Gates Vascular Institute at Kaleida Health.
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Apr;42(4):E16. doi: 10.3171/2017.1.FOCUS16500.
OBJECTIVE Acute tandem occlusions of the cervical internal carotid artery and an intracranial large vessel present treatment challenges. Controversy exists regarding which lesion should be addressed first. The authors sought to evaluate the endovascular approach for revascularization of these lesions at Gates Vascular Institute. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained, single-institution database. They analyzed demographic, procedural, radiological, and clinical outcome data for patients who underwent endovascular treatment for tandem occlusions. A modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 2 was defined as a favorable clinical outcome. RESULTS Forty-five patients were identified for inclusion in the study. The average age of these patients was 64 years; the mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at presentation was 14.4. Fifteen patients received intravenous thrombolysis before undergoing endovascular treatment. Thirty-seven (82%) of the 45 proximal cervical internal carotid artery occlusions were atherothrombotic in nature. Thirty-eight patients underwent a proximal-to-distal approach with carotid artery stenting first, followed by intracranial thrombectomy, whereas 7 patients underwent a distal-to-proximal approach (that is, intracranial thrombectomy was performed first). Thirty-seven (82%) procedures were completed with local anesthesia. For intracranial thrombectomy procedures, aspiration alone was used in 15 cases, stent retrieval alone was used in 5, and a combination of aspiration and stent-retriever thrombectomy was used in the remaining 25. The average time to revascularization was 81 minutes. Successful recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction Grade 2b/3) was achieved in 39 (87%) patients. Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores were 9.3 immediately postprocedure (p < 0.05) (n = 31), 5.1 at discharge (p < 0.05) (n = 31), and 3.6 at 3 months (p < 0.05) (n = 30). There were 5 in-hospital deaths (11%); and 2 patients (4.4%) had symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 hours postprocedure. Favorable outcomes (mRS score ≤ 2) were achieved at 3 months in 22 (73.3%) of 30 patients available for follow-up, with an mRS score of 3 for 7 of 30 (23%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Tandem occlusions present treatment challenges, but high recanalization rates were possible in the present series using acute carotid artery stenting and mechanical thrombectomy concurrently. Proximal-to-distal and aspiration approaches were most commonly used because they were safe, efficacious, and feasible. Further study in the setting of a randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the best sequence for the treatment approach and the best technology for tandem occlusion.
目的 颈内动脉和颅内大血管急性串联闭塞给治疗带来挑战。对于应先处理哪个病变存在争议。作者试图在盖茨血管研究所评估这些病变血管再通的血管内治疗方法。方法 作者对前瞻性维护的单机构数据库进行了回顾性分析。他们分析了接受串联闭塞血管内治疗患者的人口统计学、手术、放射学和临床结局数据。改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分≤2被定义为良好的临床结局。结果 确定45例患者纳入研究。这些患者的平均年龄为64岁;就诊时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表平均评分为14.4。15例患者在接受血管内治疗前接受了静脉溶栓。45例颈内动脉近端闭塞中有37例(82%)本质上是动脉粥样硬化血栓形成。38例患者采用从近端到远端的方法,先进行颈动脉支架置入,然后进行颅内血栓切除术,而7例患者采用从远端到近端的方法(即先进行颅内血栓切除术)。37例(82%)手术在局部麻醉下完成。对于颅内血栓切除术,15例仅采用抽吸,5例仅采用支架取栓,其余25例采用抽吸和支架取栓联合使用。血管再通的平均时间为81分钟。39例(87%)患者实现了成功再通(脑梗死溶栓分级2b/3级)。术后即刻美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表平均评分为9.3(p<0.05)(n = 31),出院时为5.1(p<0.05)(n = 31),3个月时为3.6(p<0.05)(n = 30)。有5例住院死亡(11%);2例患者(4.4%)在术后24小时内出现症状性颅内出血。在可进行随访的30例患者中,22例(73.3%)在3个月时获得了良好结局(mRS评分≤2),30例患者中有7例(23%)的mRS评分为3。结论 串联闭塞给治疗带来挑战,但在本系列中使用急性颈动脉支架置入和机械血栓切除术同时进行可实现较高的再通率。从近端到远端和抽吸方法最常使用,因为它们安全、有效且可行。需要在随机对照试验的背景下进行进一步研究,以确定治疗方法的最佳顺序和串联闭塞的最佳技术。