Suppr超能文献

临床立体定向放射治疗(SRS)计划中机架下垂效应的剂量学评估

Dosimetric evaluation of the gantry sag effect in clinical SRS plans.

作者信息

Borzov Egor, Nevelsky Alex, Bar-Deroma Rachel, Orion Itzhak

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.

Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

BJR Open. 2019 Feb 13;1(1):20180026. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20180026. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The gantry sag introduces a largely reproducible variation of the radiation field center around the radiation isocenter. The purpose of this work is to assess the change of the dose distribution caused by the gantry sag in clinical stereotactic plans.

METHODS

Brain stereotactic radio surgery treatment plans were evaluated and grouped according to radiation therapy planning technique. Group 1 was planned with volumetric arc therapy technique using coplanar arcs while Group 2-non-coplanar arcs. To simulate the gantry sag effect in the treatment planning system, the original plan segments were divided into four groups according to corresponding gantry angles: upper, lower, left and right quadrants. Then, isocenter of the upper quadrant was shifted towards "Gun", isocenter of the lower quadrant was shifted towards "Target" and isocenter of the left and right quadrants was left at its original positions. The magnitude of the shift was 0.5, 1 and 1.5 mm in each direction, corresponding to 1, 2 and 3 mm of gantry isocenter diameter. To estimate the changes in dose distribution between the original and modified plans, the following dose-volume metrics were tracked: planning target volume (PTV) coverage (V), hotspot dose in PTV (D), coldspot doses in PTV (D), conformity and gradient indexes, maximum point doses in organs at risk (OAR, D) and outside PTV (D). For the second group of patients volume of brain receiving 12 Gy (V) was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean relative change of all metrics was within -2%/+2.5% range for both techniques for isocenter diameter up to 2 mm. Isocenter diameter of 3 mm causes significant changes in V conformity and gradient indexes for coplanar, and additionally in D for non-coplanar plans. The largest increase of maximum point dose in OAR was 1.1, 2.1 and 3.2% for ±0.5, ±1 and ±1.5 mm shift, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate dosimetric effect of gantry sag depending on its value. By itself, the gantry sag effect does not produce clinically perceptible dose changes neither for PTV nor for OARs for shift ranges up to ±1 mm, both for coplanar and non-coplanar delivery techniques. For the larger gantry sag magnitude dosimetric changes can become significant, especially for non-coplanar plans. It indicates that 2 mm diameter tolerance of gantry isocenter postulated in TG-142 is reasonable, as variations in excess of this value start to affect the overall dosimetric and spatial uncertainty.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Dosimetric evaluation of the gantry sag effect in clinical stereotactic radio surgery plans is presented for the first time.

摘要

目的

机架下垂会在辐射等中心周围引入一个在很大程度上可重复的辐射野中心变化。本研究的目的是评估临床立体定向计划中机架下垂引起的剂量分布变化。

方法

根据放射治疗计划技术对脑部立体定向放射外科治疗计划进行评估和分组。第1组采用容积弧形治疗技术,使用共面弧形,而第2组采用非共面弧形。为了在治疗计划系统中模拟机架下垂效应,将原始计划段根据相应的机架角度分为四组:上、下、左、右象限。然后,将上象限的等中心向“靶区”移动,下象限的等中心向“靶点”移动,左、右象限的等中心保持在其原始位置。每个方向的移动幅度为0.5、1和1.5毫米,分别对应1、2和3毫米的机架等中心直径。为了估计原始计划和修改后计划之间剂量分布的变化,跟踪了以下剂量体积指标:计划靶区(PTV)覆盖率(V)、PTV中的热点剂量(D)、PTV中的冷点剂量(D)、适形度和梯度指数、危及器官(OAR)中的最大点剂量(D)和PTV外的最大点剂量(D)。对于第二组患者,分析了接受12 Gy的脑体积(V)。

结果

对于等中心直径达2毫米的情况,两种技术的所有指标的平均相对变化都在-2%/+2.5%范围内。3毫米的等中心直径会导致共面计划的V适形度和梯度指数发生显著变化,对于非共面计划,还会导致D发生显著变化。对于±0.5、±1和±1.5毫米的移动,OAR中最大点剂量的最大增加分别为1.1%、2.1%和3.2%。

结论

结果表明机架下垂的剂量学效应取决于其值。就其本身而言,对于共面和非共面递送技术,在移动范围达±1毫米时,机架下垂效应对于PTV和OAR都不会产生临床上可察觉的剂量变化。对于更大的机架下垂幅度,剂量学变化可能会变得显著,尤其是对于非共面计划而言。这表明TG - 142中假设的机架等中心2毫米直径公差是合理的,因为超过该值的变化开始影响整体剂量学和空间不确定性。

知识进展

首次对临床立体定向放射外科计划中机架下垂效应进行了剂量学评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/698d/7592487/e88f4aa47ae4/bjro.20180026.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Dosimetric evaluation of the gantry sag effect in clinical SRS plans.
BJR Open. 2019 Feb 13;1(1):20180026. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20180026. eCollection 2019.
5
Dosimetric comparison of two arc-based stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for early-stage lung cancer.
Med Dosim. 2015 Spring;40(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.10.004. Epub 2014 Dec 10.
7
Evaluation of the Impact of the Linac MLC and Gantry Sag in volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Med Phys. 2019 May;46(5):1984-1994. doi: 10.1002/mp.13491. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Dosimetric impact of VMAT delivery angles for early glottic cancer treatment.
Med Dosim. 2024;49(4):314-320. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2024.04.001. Epub 2024 May 10.
9
Potential reduction of lung dose via VMAT with jaw tracking in the treatment of single-isocenter/two-lesion lung SBRT.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 May;20(5):55-63. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12580. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

2
Five-year evaluation of linear accelerator-based SRS platform isocentricity.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Apr;26(4):e14597. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14597. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
Implementing corrections of isocentric shifts for the stereotactic irradiation of cerebral targets: Clinical validation.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022 May;23(5):e13577. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13577. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
4
Simultaneous Optimization of Radiation-Imaging Coincidence for a Multi-Energy Linac.
J Med Phys. 2021 Apr-Jun;46(2):105-110. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_7_21. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
5
Automatic Detection and Tracking of Marker Seeds Implanted in Prostate Cancer Patients using a Deep Learning Algorithm.
J Med Phys. 2021 Apr-Jun;46(2):80-87. doi: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_117_20. Epub 2021 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
SU-E-T-133: Isocenter Measurements with the Winston-Lutz Test: Impact on Treatment Planning.
Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part11):3733-3734. doi: 10.1118/1.4735191.
2
Preface.
J ICRU. 2014 Apr;14(1):1-2. doi: 10.1093/jicru/ndw036.
3
Automating linear accelerator quality assurance.
Med Phys. 2015 Oct;42(10):6074-83. doi: 10.1118/1.4931415.
4
Quantifying isocenter measurements to establish clinically meaningful thresholds.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 8;16(2):5183. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5183.
5
9
Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101.
Med Phys. 2010 Aug;37(8):4078-101. doi: 10.1118/1.3438081.
10
Use of normal tissue complication probability models in the clinic.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1754.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验