Borzov Egor, Nevelsky Alex, Bar-Deroma Rachel, Orion Itzhak
Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Nuclear Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.
BJR Open. 2019 Feb 13;1(1):20180026. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20180026. eCollection 2019.
The gantry sag introduces a largely reproducible variation of the radiation field center around the radiation isocenter. The purpose of this work is to assess the change of the dose distribution caused by the gantry sag in clinical stereotactic plans.
Brain stereotactic radio surgery treatment plans were evaluated and grouped according to radiation therapy planning technique. Group 1 was planned with volumetric arc therapy technique using coplanar arcs while Group 2-non-coplanar arcs. To simulate the gantry sag effect in the treatment planning system, the original plan segments were divided into four groups according to corresponding gantry angles: upper, lower, left and right quadrants. Then, isocenter of the upper quadrant was shifted towards "Gun", isocenter of the lower quadrant was shifted towards "Target" and isocenter of the left and right quadrants was left at its original positions. The magnitude of the shift was 0.5, 1 and 1.5 mm in each direction, corresponding to 1, 2 and 3 mm of gantry isocenter diameter. To estimate the changes in dose distribution between the original and modified plans, the following dose-volume metrics were tracked: planning target volume (PTV) coverage (V), hotspot dose in PTV (D), coldspot doses in PTV (D), conformity and gradient indexes, maximum point doses in organs at risk (OAR, D) and outside PTV (D). For the second group of patients volume of brain receiving 12 Gy (V) was analyzed.
The mean relative change of all metrics was within -2%/+2.5% range for both techniques for isocenter diameter up to 2 mm. Isocenter diameter of 3 mm causes significant changes in V conformity and gradient indexes for coplanar, and additionally in D for non-coplanar plans. The largest increase of maximum point dose in OAR was 1.1, 2.1 and 3.2% for ±0.5, ±1 and ±1.5 mm shift, respectively.
The results demonstrate dosimetric effect of gantry sag depending on its value. By itself, the gantry sag effect does not produce clinically perceptible dose changes neither for PTV nor for OARs for shift ranges up to ±1 mm, both for coplanar and non-coplanar delivery techniques. For the larger gantry sag magnitude dosimetric changes can become significant, especially for non-coplanar plans. It indicates that 2 mm diameter tolerance of gantry isocenter postulated in TG-142 is reasonable, as variations in excess of this value start to affect the overall dosimetric and spatial uncertainty.
Dosimetric evaluation of the gantry sag effect in clinical stereotactic radio surgery plans is presented for the first time.
机架下垂会在辐射等中心周围引入一个在很大程度上可重复的辐射野中心变化。本研究的目的是评估临床立体定向计划中机架下垂引起的剂量分布变化。
根据放射治疗计划技术对脑部立体定向放射外科治疗计划进行评估和分组。第1组采用容积弧形治疗技术,使用共面弧形,而第2组采用非共面弧形。为了在治疗计划系统中模拟机架下垂效应,将原始计划段根据相应的机架角度分为四组:上、下、左、右象限。然后,将上象限的等中心向“靶区”移动,下象限的等中心向“靶点”移动,左、右象限的等中心保持在其原始位置。每个方向的移动幅度为0.5、1和1.5毫米,分别对应1、2和3毫米的机架等中心直径。为了估计原始计划和修改后计划之间剂量分布的变化,跟踪了以下剂量体积指标:计划靶区(PTV)覆盖率(V)、PTV中的热点剂量(D)、PTV中的冷点剂量(D)、适形度和梯度指数、危及器官(OAR)中的最大点剂量(D)和PTV外的最大点剂量(D)。对于第二组患者,分析了接受12 Gy的脑体积(V)。
对于等中心直径达2毫米的情况,两种技术的所有指标的平均相对变化都在-2%/+2.5%范围内。3毫米的等中心直径会导致共面计划的V适形度和梯度指数发生显著变化,对于非共面计划,还会导致D发生显著变化。对于±0.5、±1和±1.5毫米的移动,OAR中最大点剂量的最大增加分别为1.1%、2.1%和3.2%。
结果表明机架下垂的剂量学效应取决于其值。就其本身而言,对于共面和非共面递送技术,在移动范围达±1毫米时,机架下垂效应对于PTV和OAR都不会产生临床上可察觉的剂量变化。对于更大的机架下垂幅度,剂量学变化可能会变得显著,尤其是对于非共面计划而言。这表明TG - 142中假设的机架等中心2毫米直径公差是合理的,因为超过该值的变化开始影响整体剂量学和空间不确定性。
首次对临床立体定向放射外科计划中机架下垂效应进行了剂量学评估。