Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;32(2):212-223. doi: 10.1111/jce.14812. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
Defining atrial fibrillation (AF) wave propagation is challenging unless local signal features are discrete or periodic. Periodic focal or rotational activity may identify AF drivers. Our objective was to characterize AF propagation at sites with periodic activation to evaluate the prevalence and relationship between focal and rotational activation.
We included 80 patients (61 ± 10 years, persistent AF 49%) from the FaST randomized trial that compared the efficacy of adjunctive focal site ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation. Patients underwent left atrial (LA) activation mapping with a 20-pole circular catheter during spontaneous or induced AF. Five-second bipolar and unipolar electrograms in AF were analyzed. Periodic sites were identified by spectral analysis of the bipolar electrogram. Activation maps of periodic sites were constructed using an automated, validated tracking algorithm, and classified into three patterns: focal sites (FS), rotation (RO), or pseudo-rotation (pRO).
The most common propagation pattern at periodic sites was FS for 5-s in all patients (4.9 ± 1.9 per patient). RO and pRO were observed in two and seven patients, respectively, but were all transient (3-5 cycles). Activation from a FS evolved into transient RO/pRO in five patients. No patient had autonomous RO/pRO activations. Patients with RO/pRO had greater LA surface area with periodicity (78 ± 7 vs. 63 ± 16%, p = .0002) and shorter LA periodicity CL (166 ± 10 vs. 190±28 ms, p = .0001) than the rest.
Using automated, regional AF periodicity mapping, FS is more prevalent and temporally stable than RO/pRO. Most RO/pRO evolve from neighboring FS. These findings and their implications for AF maintenance require verification with global, panoramic mapping.
除非局部信号特征是离散的或周期性的,否则定义心房颤动 (AF) 波的传播是具有挑战性的。周期性的局灶或旋转活动可能会识别 AF 的驱动因素。我们的目的是描述具有周期性激活的 AF 传播部位,以评估局灶和旋转激活的发生率和关系。
我们纳入了 FaST 随机试验中的 80 名患者(61±10 岁,持续性 AF 占 49%),该试验比较了辅助局灶部位消融与肺静脉隔离的疗效。患者在自发或诱发的 AF 期间接受左心房 (LA) 激活图描记术,使用 20 极环形导管。对 AF 中的 5 秒双极和单极电图进行分析。通过双极电图的频谱分析识别周期性部位。使用自动、验证的跟踪算法构建周期性部位的激活图,并将其分为三种模式:局灶部位 (FS)、旋转 (RO) 或假性旋转 (pRO)。
在所有患者中,周期性部位最常见的传播模式是 FS,持续 5 秒(每个患者 4.9±1.9 个)。RO 和 pRO 分别在两名和七名患者中观察到,但均为短暂性(3-5 个周期)。五名患者的 FS 激活演变为短暂的 RO/pRO。没有患者出现自主的 RO/pRO 激活。RO/pRO 患者的 LA 表面面积较大且具有周期性(78±7%与 63±16%,p=0.0002),LA 周期性 CL 较短(166±10 与 190±28ms,p=0.0001)。
使用自动的、区域性的 AF 周期性图描记术,FS 比 RO/pRO 更常见且时间更稳定。大多数 RO/pRO 是从相邻的 FS 演变而来的。这些发现及其对 AF 维持的影响需要通过全局、全景图描记术来验证。