• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“少即是多”:使用 Rasch 分析法对五种脑损伤康复信托人格问卷(BIRT-PQs)短式量表进行验证。

'Less is more': validation with Rasch analysis of five short-forms for the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Personality Questionnaires (BIRT-PQs).

机构信息

Neurorehabilitation Research Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana , Rome, Italy.

School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University , Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2020 Dec 5;34(13-14):1741-1755. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1836402. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1080/02699052.2020.1836402
PMID:33180650
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous analyses demonstrated a lack of unidimensionality, item redundancy, and substantial administrative burden for the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Personality Questionnaires (BIRT-PQs).

OBJECTIVE

To use Rasch Analysis to calibrate five short-forms of the BIRT-PQs, satisfying the Rasch model requirements.

METHODS

BIRT-PQs data from 154 patients with severe Acquired Brain Injury (s-ABI) and their caregivers (total sample = 308) underwent Rasch analysis to examine their internal construct validity and reliability according to the Rasch model.

RESULTS

The base Rasch analyses did not show sufficient internal construct validity according to the Rasch model for all five BIRT-PQs. After rescoring 18 items, and deleting 75 of 150 items, adequate internal construct validity was achieved for all five BIRT-PQs short forms (model chi-square -values ranging from 0.0053 to 0.6675), with reliability values compatible with individual measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

After extensive modifications, including a 48% reduction of the item load, we obtained five short forms of the BIRT-PQs satisfying the strict measurement requirements of the Rasch model. The ordinal-to-interval measurement conversion tables allow measuring on the same metric the perception of the neurobehavioral disability for both patients with s-ABI and their caregivers.

摘要

背景

先前的分析表明,脑损伤康复信托人格问卷(BIRT-PQs)缺乏单一维度、项目冗余和大量行政负担。

目的

使用 Rasch 分析来校准 BIRT-PQs 的五个简短形式,以满足 Rasch 模型的要求。

方法

对 154 名严重获得性脑损伤(s-ABI)患者及其照顾者(总样本=308)的 BIRT-PQs 数据进行 Rasch 分析,根据 Rasch 模型检查其内部结构效度和信度。

结果

根据 Rasch 模型,所有五个 BIRT-PQs 的基础 Rasch 分析均未显示出足够的内部结构效度。在重新评分 18 个项目并删除 150 个项目中的 75 个后,所有五个 BIRT-PQs 简短形式都达到了足够的内部结构效度(模型卡方值范围从 0.0053 到 0.6675),可靠性值与个体测量值兼容。

结论

经过广泛修改,包括项目负荷减少 48%,我们获得了五个满足 Rasch 模型严格测量要求的 BIRT-PQs 简短形式。顺序到区间测量转换表允许在相同的度量上测量患者和照顾者对神经行为障碍的感知。

相似文献

1
'Less is more': validation with Rasch analysis of five short-forms for the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Personality Questionnaires (BIRT-PQs).“少即是多”:使用 Rasch 分析法对五种脑损伤康复信托人格问卷(BIRT-PQs)短式量表进行验证。
Brain Inj. 2020 Dec 5;34(13-14):1741-1755. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1836402. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
The unidimensionality of the five Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust Personality Questionnaires (BIRT-PQs) may be improved: preliminary evidence from classical psychometrics.五项脑损伤康复信托人格问卷(BIRT-PQs)的单维性可能会得到改善:来自经典心理测量学的初步证据。
Brain Inj. 2020 Apr 15;34(5):673-684. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1723700. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
3
Measuring coping style following acquired brain injury: a modification of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations Using Rasch analysis.测量获得性脑损伤后的应对方式:使用拉施分析对压力情境应对量表的修订。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2015 Sep;54(3):249-65. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12070. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
4
The Early Functional Abilities-revised may bridge the gap between the disorder of consciousness and the functional independence scales: evidence from Rasch analysis.早期功能能力修订版可能弥合意识障碍和功能独立性量表之间的差距:来自Rasch 分析的证据。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Dec;58(6):805-817. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07522-0. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
5
Construct validity and reliability of the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire.Rivermead脑震荡后症状问卷的结构效度和信度
Clin Rehabil. 2005 Dec;19(8):878-87. doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr905oa.
6
Is the Berg Balance Scale an effective tool for the measurement of early postural control impairments in patients with Parkinson's disease? Evidence from Rasch analysis.伯格平衡量表是测量帕金森病患者早期姿势控制障碍的有效工具吗?来自拉施分析的证据。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015 Dec;51(6):705-16. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
7
The structure of the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI) should be modified: evidence from a Rasch analysis study.早期康复巴氏指数(ERBI)的结构需要修正:来自 Rasch 分析研究的证据。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Aug;59(4):458-473. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07908-X. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
8
Development and validation of a 6-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-6) using Rasch analysis.运用 Rasch 分析开发并验证 6 项修订版加州大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(RULS-6)。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):233-256. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12404. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Measuring Neurobehavioral Functioning in People With Traumatic Brain Injury: Rasch Analysis of Neurobehavioral Functioning Inventory.测量创伤性脑损伤患者的神经行为功能:神经行为功能量表的拉施分析
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016 Jul-Aug;31(4):E59-68. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000170.
10
Evaluation of the internal construct validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析评估个人护理参与评估与资源工具(PC-PART)的内部结构效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 5;14:543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0543-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) in subjects with frozen shoulder: a reliability and validity study.冻结肩患者的手臂肩手残疾(DASH)量表的心理测量学特性:一项信度和效度研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 2;25(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07371-8.
2
Rasch analysis of the forgotten joint score in patients with total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后遗忘关节评分的 Rasch 分析。
J Rehabil Med. 2024 Jan 10;56:jrm15774. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v56.15774.
3
The structure of the Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERBI) should be modified: evidence from a Rasch analysis study.
早期康复巴氏指数(ERBI)的结构需要修正:来自 Rasch 分析研究的证据。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Aug;59(4):458-473. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07908-X. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
4
When 'good' is not good enough: a retrospective Rasch analysis study of the Berg Balance Scale for persons with Multiple Sclerosis.当“良好”还不够好时:对多发性硬化症患者伯格平衡量表的回顾性拉施分析研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 20;14:1171163. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1171163. eCollection 2023.
5
The Early Functional Abilities-revised may bridge the gap between the disorder of consciousness and the functional independence scales: evidence from Rasch analysis.早期功能能力修订版可能弥合意识障碍和功能独立性量表之间的差距:来自Rasch 分析的证据。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Dec;58(6):805-817. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07522-0. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
6
Efficacy of a multiple-component and multifactorial personalized fall prevention program in a mixed population of community-dwelling older adults with stroke, Parkinson's Disease, or frailty compared to usual care: The PRE.C.I.S.A. randomized controlled trial.与常规护理相比,多成分、多因素个性化跌倒预防计划在患有中风、帕金森病或身体虚弱的社区居住老年人混合群体中的效果:PRE.C.I.S.A.随机对照试验
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 1;13:943918. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.943918. eCollection 2022.
7
How Do Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Children with Developmental Delays Differ on the Child Behavior Checklist 1.5-5 DSM-Oriented Scales?自闭症谱系障碍儿童和发育迟缓儿童在儿童行为量表1.5 - 5 DSM导向量表上有何差异?
Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;9(1):111. doi: 10.3390/children9010111.