Pedodontics & Preventive Dentistry, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Dent Traumatol. 2021 Apr;37(2):161-176. doi: 10.1111/edt.12621. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
Dental professionals are the primary care providers for traumatic dental injuries (TDI). The dental traumatology literature has a number of studies evaluating the knowledge of dental professionals from different parts of the world but its global status is unknown. Hence, the aim of this systematic review was to assess the global status of knowledge for the prevention and emergency management of TDI in dental professionals and to provide recommendations for future research.
The protocol was designed as per the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020192381). A broad-based search using text words and MeSH terms was performed in established databases as per a pre-defined strategy without any distinction of language and year of publication. Studies without details of the questionnaire, knowledge score, validity and reliability were excluded. Data extraction was performed, risk of bias assessment was done using the Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tool, and a meta-analysis was performed.
Sixteen studies, which had been published between 2008 and 2020, were included for qualitative synthesis. Most of them were cross-sectional, used convenience sampling and evaluated knowledge for avulsion. Previous dental trauma training was undertaken by <50% of the participants of five studies, <50% knew about the correct approach in management of complicated crown fractures in three studies and ≤60% in four studies knew the critical time for replantation. There was insufficient level of knowledge in >50% of the included studies. High risk of bias was found in three studies.
The knowledge level in several areas of the world was unknown. The studies lacked uniformity in methods and well-designed questionnaires and they revealed insufficient levels of knowledge among dental professionals.
牙科专业人员是创伤性牙外伤(TDI)的主要护理人员。牙科创伤学文献中有许多研究评估了来自世界不同地区的牙科专业人员的知识,但全球状况尚不清楚。因此,本系统评价的目的是评估全球牙科专业人员预防和紧急处理 TDI 的知识状况,并为未来的研究提供建议。
该方案按照 PRISMA 指南设计,并在 PROSPERO(CRD42020192381)中进行了注册。根据预先确定的策略,使用文本词和 MeSH 术语在已建立的数据库中进行了广泛的搜索,而不分语言和出版年份。排除了没有问卷详细信息、知识评分、有效性和可靠性的研究。进行了数据提取,使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所的批判性评估工具进行了偏倚风险评估,并进行了荟萃分析。
纳入了 16 项研究,这些研究发表于 2008 年至 2020 年之间,用于定性综合分析。它们大多数是横断面研究,使用方便抽样,并评估了关于脱位的知识。五份研究中有 <50%的参与者接受过先前的牙科创伤培训,三份研究中有 <50%的人了解复杂冠折的正确处理方法,四份研究中有 ≤60%的人了解再植的关键时间。在 >50%的纳入研究中,知识水平不足。有三份研究存在高偏倚风险。
世界上几个地区的知识水平尚不清楚。这些研究在方法和设计良好的问卷方面缺乏一致性,揭示了牙科专业人员知识水平不足。