• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Developing a Standardized Process for Divisional Scientific Review of Research Protocols Submitted to the Institutional Review Board.

作者信息

Reed Jennifer L, Amlal Sihame, Schumacher Daniel J, Kerrey Ben, Schnadower David

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH.

Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 2021 Jul;234:7-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.11.012
PMID:33181194
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Developing a Standardized Process for Divisional Scientific Review of Research Protocols Submitted to the Institutional Review Board.为提交给机构审查委员会的研究方案制定部门科学审查的标准化流程。
J Pediatr. 2021 Jul;234:7-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.11.012. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
An appraisal of the process of protocol review by an ethics review conmmittee in a tertiary institution in Ibadan.伊巴丹一所高等院校的伦理审查委员会对方案审查过程的评估。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2011 Jun;40(2):163-9.
3
Is your ethics committee efficient? Using "IRB Metrics" as a self-assessment tool for continuous improvement at the Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Thailand.你的伦理委员会高效吗？使用“机构审查委员会指标”作为泰国玛希隆大学热带医学院持续改进的自我评估工具。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 18;9(11):e113356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113356. eCollection 2014.
4
The purpose, composition, and function of an institutional review board: balancing priorities.机构审查委员会的目的、组成和功能：平衡优先事项
Respir Care. 2008 Oct;53(10):1330-6.
5
Description and Evaluation of the Research Ethics Review Process in Japan: Proposed Measures for Improvement.日本研究伦理审查过程的描述与评估：改进建议措施
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 Jul;11(3):256-66. doi: 10.1177/1556264616660644.
6
The ethics and governance of medical research: what does regulation have to do with morality?医学研究的伦理与治理：监管与道德有何关系？
New Rev Bioeth. 2003 Nov;1(1):41-58. doi: 10.1080/1740028032000131413.
7
The roles, challenges and institutionalization of institutional review boards.机构审查委员会的作用、挑战与制度化
Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2008 Apr-Jun;18(2):115-9. doi: 10.4314/nqjhm.v18i2.45000.
8
Institutional review boards' attitudes towards remuneration in paediatric research: Ethical considerations.机构审查委员会对儿科研究中报酬的态度：伦理考量
J Paediatr Child Health. 2017 Dec;53(12):1149-1151. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13711. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
9
Food and Drug Administration public hearing on the conduct of emergency clinical research: testimony of Dr. Weisfeldt.美国食品药品监督管理局关于开展紧急临床研究的公开听证会：魏斯费尔特博士的证词
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):e69. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.027. Epub 2007 Mar 1.
10
Transitioning to the National Institutes of Health single institutional review board model: Piloting the use of the Streamlined, Multi-site, Accelerated Resources for Trials IRB Reliance.过渡到美国国立卫生研究院单一机构审查委员会模式：试用简化、多地点、加速试验 IRB 资源依赖的方法。
Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;16(3):290-296. doi: 10.1177/1740774519832911. Epub 2019 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Framework for the Enrollment of Children and Families in Emergency Department Research.儿童及其家庭参与急诊科研究的招募框架的制定。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Jan 9;6(1):100018. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100018. eCollection 2025 Feb.