Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Sep 1;39(6):474-480. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000794. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
Stereotactic EEG (SEEG) is being increasingly used in the intracranial evaluation of refractory epilepsy in the United States. In this study, the authors describe current practice of SEEG among National Association of Epilepsy Centers tertiary referral (level IV) centers.
Using the Survey Monkey platform, a survey was sent to all National Association of Epilepsy Centers level IV center directors.
Of 192 centers polled, 104 directors completed the survey (54% response rate). Ninety-two percent currently perform SEEG. Of these, 55% of institutions reported that greater than 75% of their invasive electrode cases used SEEG. Stereotactic EEG was commonly used over subdural electrodes in cases of suspected mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (87%), nonlesional frontal lobe epilepsy (79%), insular epilepsy (100%), and individuals with prior epilepsy surgery (74%). Most centers (72%) used single-lead electrocardiogram monitoring concurrently with SEEG, but less than half used continuous pulse oximetry (47%) and only a few used respiratory belts (3%). Other significant intercenter technical variabilities included electrode nomenclature and choice of reference electrode. Patient care protocols varied among centers in patient-to-nurse ratio and allowed patient activity. Half of all centers had personnel who had prior experience in SEEG (50.5%); 20% of centers had adopted SEEG without any formal training.
Stereotactic EEG has become the principal method for intracranial EEG monitoring in the majority of epilepsy surgery centers in the United States. Most report similar indications for use of SEEG, though significant variability exists in the utilization of concurrent cardiopulmonary monitoring as well as several technical and patient care practices. There is significant variability in level of background training in SEEG among practitioners. The study highlights the need for consensus statements and guidelines to benchmark SEEG practice and develop uniform standards in the United States.
立体定向脑电图(SEEG)在美国越来越多地用于颅内评估难治性癫痫。在这项研究中,作者描述了美国国家癫痫中心三级转诊(四级)中心目前的 SEEG 实践。
使用 Survey Monkey 平台,向所有国家癫痫中心四级中心主任发送了一项调查。
在接受调查的 192 个中心中,有 104 名主任完成了调查(54%的回复率)。92%的中心目前进行 SEEG。其中,55%的机构报告说,他们 75%以上的侵袭性电极病例使用 SEEG。在疑似内侧颞叶癫痫(87%)、非病变性额叶癫痫(79%)、岛叶癫痫(100%)和既往癫痫手术患者(74%)中,SEEG 通常优于硬膜下电极。大多数中心(72%)在进行 SEEG 的同时使用单导联心电图监测,但不到一半的中心使用连续脉搏血氧仪(47%),只有少数中心使用呼吸带(3%)。其他重要的中心间技术差异包括电极命名法和参考电极的选择。各中心之间的患者护理协议在护士与患者的比例和允许患者活动方面存在差异。所有中心中有一半(50.5%)有之前有过 SEEG 经验的人员;20%的中心在没有任何正式培训的情况下采用了 SEEG。
立体定向脑电图已成为美国大多数癫痫手术中心颅内脑电图监测的主要方法。大多数中心报告的 SEEG 应用指征相似,但在心肺监测的同时使用、以及一些技术和患者护理实践方面存在显著差异。SEEG 实践方面,从业者的背景培训水平存在显著差异。该研究强调需要达成共识声明和指南,以基准 SEEG 实践,并在美国制定统一标准。