Lappharat Sattamat, Liabsuetrakul Tippawan
Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 13;99(46):e23161. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023161.
To investigate the accuracy of screening tests for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in Southeast Asian pregnant women.
We searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, and Google for relevant articles published in English up to November 2018 using search terms related to GDM, screening tests for GDM and diagnostic performance. The studies were independently screened and selected by both authors. The methodological quality of the included studies was independently assessed by quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies 2. A hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model was created to estimate the HSROC curve. The summary sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated in a meta-analysis using bivariate random-effects model.
A total of 19 studies were included in which the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and 75 g OGTT were the two common reference standards for diagnosis of GDM. Most points of diagnostic performance in the HSROC 50 g GCT curve compared with the 100 g OGTT reference standard were clustered in the upper left-hand quadrant. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of the 50 g GCT were 79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64%-89%) and 74% (95% CI 59%-85%), respectively. For the 75 g OGTT reference standard, the non-fasting 2-hour plasma glucose showed quite similar sensitivity the 50 g GCT compared with the 100 g OGTT reference standard. The pooled sensitivities and specificities of the fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c were 81% (95% CI 76%-86%) and 70% (95% CI 67%-72%), and 80% (95% CI 66%-90%) and 69% (95% CI 58%-78%), respectively.
Our findings indicate that the 50 g GCT using the threshold of 140 mg/dL is a good screening test for identifying GDM at 24 to 28 weeks' gestational age for both high-risk and universal screening strategies in Southeast Asian countries. The non-fasting 2-hour PG, fasting plasma glucose or hemoglobin A1c are alternative choices for screening.
探讨东南亚孕妇妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)筛查试验的准确性。
我们在PubMed(MEDLINE)、科学网、考克兰图书馆、ClinicalTrials.gov、谷歌学术和谷歌上搜索截至2018年11月以英文发表的相关文章,使用与GDM、GDM筛查试验和诊断性能相关的搜索词。两位作者独立筛选和选择研究。纳入研究的方法学质量由诊断准确性研究质量评估2独立评估。创建分层汇总接受者操作特征(HSROC)模型以估计HSROC曲线。在荟萃分析中使用双变量随机效应模型计算汇总敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断比值比。
共纳入19项研究,其中100g口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)和75g OGTT是诊断GDM的两种常见参考标准。与100g OGTT参考标准相比,HSROC 50g葡萄糖筛查试验(GCT)曲线中的大多数诊断性能点聚集在左上方象限。50g GCT的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为79%(95%置信区间[CI]64%-89%)和74%(95%CI 59%-85%)。对于75g OGTT参考标准,与100g OGTT参考标准相比,非空腹2小时血糖与50g GCT的敏感性相当。空腹血糖和糖化血红蛋白A1c的汇总敏感性和特异性分别为81%(95%CI 76%-86%)和70%(95%CI 67%-72%),以及80%(95%CI 66%-90%)和69%(95%CI 58%-78%)。
我们的研究结果表明,对于东南亚国家的高危和普遍筛查策略,使用140mg/dL阈值的50g GCT是在孕24至28周时识别GDM的良好筛查试验。非空腹2小时血糖、空腹血糖或糖化血红蛋白A1c是筛查的替代选择。