• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

五种市售益生菌制剂对白色念珠菌生长的影响:体外研究

Effect of Five Commercial Probiotic Formulations on Candida Albicans Growth: In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Hernández-Bautista Liz Mariana, Márquez-Preciado Raúl, Ortiz-Magdaleno Marine, Pozos-Guillén Amaury, Aranda-Romo Saray, Sánchez-Vargas Luis Octavio

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Sep 1;44(5):315-322. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.5.5.

DOI:10.17796/1053-4625-44.5.5
PMID:33181850
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective was to evaluate the antagonistic effect of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium recovered from five commercial probiotics on the growth of C. albicans.

STUDY DESIGN

The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains of five commercial probiotics were recovered and grown: Probio Hp+®, ProBiseis®, Lactipan®, Liolactil®, and Lacteol Fort®; 50 mg of each was hydrated and grown in Lactobacilli MRS (De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe) broth and incubated at 37°C with stirring (120 RPM) for 24 hours. Serial dilutions of 10-1 to 10-7 were made and viability was verified and quantified. For the antagonism tests, a suspension/inoculum of Lactobacillus strains recovered from each commercial preparation (4-30 × 109) and C. albicans ATCC 90028 (1.5-8 × 108) was prepared in MRS broth and incubated for 48 hours at 36°C, then plated on Dextrose Sabouraud Agar with Chloramphenicol and Rogosa Agar and the colony-forming units (CFU) were quantified. Additionally, viability was evaluated using the LIVE/DEAD® Yeast and Bacterial Viability kit.

RESULTS

The probiotic that produced the highest acidity of the medium was Lactipan®, followed by Probiseis® and Liolactil®, while Probio Hp+® showed the least change. Probiseis® was determined to have the highest growth of probiotic bacteria and the highest inhibition on C. albicans, followed by Lactipan®; Liolactil® and ProbioHp+® showed the least effect. In fluorescence tests, ProBiseis® showed the best effect, followed by Liolactil® and Lactipan®; Probio Hp+® had less of an effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Two commercial products (ProBiseis and Lactipan) whose formulations have L. acidophilus, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, B. infantis, and S. thermophilus have a greater inhibitory effect on C. albicans ATCC 90028.

摘要

目的

评估从五种商业益生菌中分离出的乳酸杆菌和双歧杆菌对白色念珠菌生长的拮抗作用。

研究设计

从五种商业益生菌中分离并培养乳酸杆菌和双歧杆菌菌株:Probio Hp+®、ProBiseis®、Lactipan®、Liolactil®和Lacteol Fort®;每种取50毫克进行水化处理,在乳酸杆菌MRS(德氏、罗格斯和夏普)肉汤中培养,于37°C搅拌(120转/分钟)孵育24小时。进行10⁻¹至10⁻⁷的系列稀释,并验证和量化活力。对于拮抗试验,在MRS肉汤中制备从每种商业制剂中分离出的乳酸杆菌菌株悬液/接种物(4 - 30×10⁹)和白色念珠菌ATCC 90028(1.5 - 8×10⁸),于36°C孵育48小时,然后接种到含氯霉素的葡萄糖沙氏琼脂和罗格斯琼脂上,对菌落形成单位(CFU)进行量化。此外,使用LIVE/DEAD®酵母和细菌活力试剂盒评估活力。

结果

使培养基酸度最高的益生菌是Lactipan®,其次是ProBiseis®和Liolactil®,而Probio Hp+®的变化最小。确定ProBiseis®的益生菌生长最高,对白色念珠菌的抑制作用最强,其次是Lactipan®;Liolactil®和ProbioHp+®的作用最小。在荧光试验中,ProBiseis®效果最佳,其次是Liolactil®和Lactipan®;Probio Hp+®的效果较差。

结论

两种商业产品(ProBiseis和Lactipan),其配方含有嗜酸乳杆菌、干酪乳杆菌、鼠李糖乳杆菌、植物乳杆菌、婴儿双歧杆菌和嗜热链球菌,对白色念珠菌ATCC 90028具有更大的抑制作用。

相似文献

1
Effect of Five Commercial Probiotic Formulations on Candida Albicans Growth: In Vitro Study.五种市售益生菌制剂对白色念珠菌生长的影响:体外研究
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020 Sep 1;44(5):315-322. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-44.5.5.
2
Towards effective and stable probiotics.迈向高效稳定的益生菌。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S65-6. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150692.
3
Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356 inhibits biofilm formation by C. albicans and attenuates the experimental candidiasis in Galleria mellonella.嗜酸乳杆菌ATCC 4356可抑制白色念珠菌生物膜的形成,并减轻大蜡螟实验性念珠菌病。
Virulence. 2015;6(1):29-39. doi: 10.4161/21505594.2014.981486.
4
Evaluation of the Role of Probiotics in Endodontic Treatment: A Preliminary Study.益生菌在牙髓病治疗中的作用评估:一项初步研究。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017 Jan-Feb;7(1):46-51. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.200710. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
5
Viability, Acid and Bile Tolerance of Spray Dried Probiotic Bacteria and Some Commercial Probiotic Supplement Products Kept at Room Temperature.喷雾干燥益生菌及部分室温保存的市售益生菌补充剂产品的活力、耐酸性和耐胆汁性
J Food Sci. 2016 Jun;81(6):M1472-9. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13313. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
Antimicrobial activity of probiotics against endodontic pathogens:- A preliminary study.益生菌对牙髓病病原体的抗菌活性:一项初步研究。
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2019 Jan-Mar;37(1):5-11. doi: 10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_18_333.
7
Growth inhibition of oral mutans streptococci and candida by commercial probiotic lactobacilli--an in vitro study.商业益生菌乳杆菌对口腔变异链球菌和念珠菌生长的抑制作用——一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2010 Jul 2;10:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-10-18.
8
Use of modified Lactobacillus selective medium and Bifidobacterium iodoacetate medium for differential enumeration of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. in powdered nutritional products.使用改良的乳酸杆菌选择性培养基和碘乙酸盐双歧杆菌培养基对粉末状营养产品中的嗜酸乳杆菌和双歧杆菌进行鉴别计数。
J Food Prot. 1999 Jan;62(1):77-80. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-62.1.77.
9
Probiotic lactobacilli inhibit early stages of Candida albicans biofilm development by reducing their growth, cell adhesion, and filamentation.益生菌乳杆菌通过减少其生长、细胞黏附和菌丝形成来抑制白念珠菌生物膜的早期形成。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jul;100(14):6415-6426. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7527-3. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
10
Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic susceptibility of and spp. intended for use as starter and probiotic cultures.拟用作发酵剂和益生菌培养物的[具体菌种1]和[具体菌种2]的抗菌活性及抗生素敏感性。 (你原文中“and and spp.”表述有误,我按推测补充了[具体菌种1]和[具体菌种2],请根据实际内容修改完善)
Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015 Jan 2;29(1):84-91. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2014.987450. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Candida albicans: the current status regarding vaginal infections.白色念珠菌:关于阴道感染的现状
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2025 Apr 10;109(1):91. doi: 10.1007/s00253-025-13478-2.
2
Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis HN019 has antimicrobial activity against endodontic pathogens in vitro.动物双歧杆菌亚种乳双歧杆菌 HN019 具有抗口腔内病原微生物的活性。
Braz J Microbiol. 2023 Sep;54(3):2289-2295. doi: 10.1007/s42770-023-01083-2. Epub 2023 Aug 26.