Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO 80303, USA; Environmental Studies Program, University of Colorado, Boulder, 4001 Discovery Drive, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.
U.S. Geological Survey, Water Mission Area, W 6th Ave Kipling St., Lakewood, CO 80225, USA.
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jan 1;750:142179. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142179. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
Sulfur (S) is widely used in agriculture, yet little is known about its fates within upland watersheds, particularly in combination with disturbances like wildfire. Our study examined the effects of land use and wildfire on the biogeochemical "fingerprints," or the quantity and chemical composition, of S and carbon (C). We conducted our research within the Napa River Watershed, California, U.S., where high S applications to vineyards are common, and ~ 20% of the watershed burned in October 2017, introducing a disturbance now common across the warmer, drier Western U.S. We used a laboratory rainfall experiment to compare unburned and low severity burned vineyard and grassland soils. We then sampled streams draining sub-catchments with differing land use and degrees of burn and burn severity to understand combined effects at broader spatial scales. Before the laboratory experiment, vineyard soils had 2-3.5 times more S than grassland soils, while burned soils-regardless of land use-had 1.5-2 times more C than unburned soils. During the laboratory experiment, vineyard soil leachates had 16-20 times more S than grassland leachates, whereas leachate C was more variable across land use and burn soil types. Unburned and burned vineyard soils leached S with δS values enriched 6-15‰ relative to grassland soils, likely due to microbial S processes within vineyard soils. Streams draining vineyards also had the fingerprint of agricultural S, with ~2-5 fold higher S concentrations and ~ 10‰ enriched δS-SO values relative to streams draining non-agricultural areas. However, streams draining a higher fraction of burned non-agricultural areas also had enriched δS values relative to unburned non-agricultural areas, which we attribute to loss of S during combustion. Our findings illustrate the interacting effects of wildfire and land use on watershed S and C cycling-a new consideration under a changing climate, with significant implications for ecosystem function and human health.
硫(S)在农业中被广泛应用,但人们对其在旱地流域中的归宿知之甚少,尤其是在野火等干扰因素的情况下。我们的研究考察了土地利用和野火对生物地球化学“指纹”(即 S 和碳(C)的数量和化学组成)的影响。我们在美国加利福尼亚州纳帕河流域进行了研究,该流域葡萄园大量使用 S,并且20%的流域在 2017 年 10 月发生野火,这种干扰现在在美国西部较温暖、较干燥的地区很常见。我们使用实验室降雨实验来比较未燃烧和低严重度燃烧的葡萄园和草地土壤。然后,我们对不同土地利用和燃烧程度及燃烧严重度的汇流区的溪流进行采样,以在更广泛的空间尺度上了解综合效应。在实验室实验之前,葡萄园土壤中的 S 含量比草地土壤高 2-3.5 倍,而无论土地利用如何,燃烧土壤中的 C 含量比未燃烧土壤高 1.5-2 倍。在实验室实验期间,葡萄园土壤淋出液中的 S 含量比草地淋出液高 16-20 倍,而淋出液 C 则在土地利用和燃烧土壤类型之间变化更大。未燃烧和燃烧的葡萄园土壤淋出液中的 S 具有 6-15‰相对草地土壤的 δS 值富集,这可能是由于葡萄园土壤中的微生物 S 过程所致。从葡萄园流出的溪流也具有农业 S 的指纹,其 S 浓度比非农业区溪流高 2-5 倍,δS-SO 值富集10‰。然而,从燃烧的非农业区流出的溪流的 δS 值也比未燃烧的非农业区溪流更富集,我们认为这是由于燃烧过程中 S 的损失所致。我们的研究结果说明了野火和土地利用对流域 S 和 C 循环的相互作用影响——这是在气候变化背景下需要新考虑的因素,对生态系统功能和人类健康具有重要意义。