College of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Transdisciplinary Major in Learning Health Systems, Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 9;17(21):8255. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218255.
Delirium is highly prevalent and leads to several bad outcomes for older long-term care (LTC) residents. For a more successful translation of delirium knowledge, Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) tailored to LTC should be developed and applied based on the understanding of the barriers to implementation. This study was conducted to develop a CPG for delirium in LTC and to determine the barriers perceived by healthcare professionals related to the implementation of the CPG. We followed a structured, evidence- and theory-based procedure during the development process. After a systematic search, quality appraisal, and selection for eligible up-to-date CPGs for delirium, the recommendations applicable to the LTC were drafted, evaluated, and confirmed by an external group of experts. To evaluate the barriers to guideline uptake from the users' perspectives, semi-structured interviews were conducted which resulted in four major themes: (1) a lack of resources, (2) a tendency to follow mindlines rather than guidelines, (3) passive attitudes, and (4) misunderstanding delirium care in LTC. To minimize adverse prognoses through prompt delirium care, the implementation of a CPG with an approach that comprehensively considers various barriers at the system, practice, healthcare professional, and patients/family levels is necessary.
谵妄在老年长期护理(LTC)居民中非常普遍,导致许多不良后果。为了更成功地将谵妄知识进行翻译,应该根据对实施障碍的理解,制定并应用专门针对 LTC 的临床实践指南(CPG)。本研究旨在制定 LTC 谵妄的 CPG,并确定医疗保健专业人员在实施 CPG 方面所感知到的障碍。在开发过程中,我们遵循了结构化、基于证据和理论的程序。在对谵妄的最新 CPG 进行系统搜索、质量评估和选择后,起草了适用于 LTC 的建议,并由外部专家组进行评估和确认。为了从用户的角度评估指南采用的障碍,我们进行了半结构化访谈,结果得出了四个主要主题:(1)资源匮乏,(2)倾向于遵循思维模式而非指南,(3)消极态度,以及(4)对 LTC 中谵妄护理的误解。为了通过及时的谵妄护理最小化不良预后,有必要采用一种方法,全面考虑系统、实践、医疗保健专业人员和患者/家庭层面的各种障碍来实施 CPG。