• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价与荟萃分析:壶腹病变的内镜和手术切除

Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Endoscopic and Surgical Resection for Ampullary Lesions.

作者信息

Heise Christian, Abou Ali Einas, Hasenclever Dirk, Auriemma Francesco, Gulla Aiste, Regner Sara, Gaujoux Sébastien, Hollenbach Marcus

机构信息

Department of Medicine I-Gastroenterology, Pulmonology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06097 Halle, Germany.

Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Oncology and Endoscopy, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, 75014 Paris, France.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 10;9(11):3622. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113622.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9113622
PMID:33182806
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7696506/
Abstract

Ampullary lesions (ALs) can be treated by endoscopic (EA) or surgical ampullectomy (SA) or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). However, EA carries significant risk of incomplete resection while surgical interventions can lead to substantial morbidity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for R0, adverse-events (AEs) and recurrence between EA, SA and PD. Electronic databases were searched from 1990 to 2018. Outcomes were calculated as pooled means using fixed and random-effects models and the Freeman-Tukey-Double-Arcsine-Proportion-model. We identified 59 independent studies. The pooled R0 rate was 76.6% (71.8-81.4%, I = 91.38%) for EA, 96.4% (93.6-99.2%, I = 37.8%) for SA and 98.9% (98.0-99.7%, I = 0%) for PD. AEs were 24.7% (19.8-29.6%, I = 86.4%), 28.3% (19.0-37.7%, I = 76.8%) and 44.7% (37.9-51.4%, I = 0%), respectively. Recurrences were registered in 13.0% (10.2-15.6%, I = 91.3%), 9.4% (4.8-14%, I = 57.3%) and 14.2% (9.5-18.9%, I = 0%). Differences between proportions were significant in R0 for EA compared to SA ( = 0.007) and PD ( = 0.022). AEs were statistically different only between EA and PD ( = 0.049) and recurrence showed no significance for EA/SA or EA/PD. Our data indicate an increased rate of complete resection in surgical interventions accompanied with a higher risk of complications. However, studies showed various sources of bias, limited quality of data and a significant heterogeneity, particularly in EA studies.

摘要

壶腹病变(ALs)可通过内镜下壶腹切除术(EA)、手术性壶腹切除术(SA)或胰十二指肠切除术(PD)进行治疗。然而,EA存在切除不完全的重大风险,而手术干预可能导致严重的发病率。我们对EA、SA和PD之间的R0、不良事件(AE)和复发情况进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。检索了1990年至2018年的电子数据库。使用固定效应模型和随机效应模型以及Freeman-Tukey-Double-Arcsine-Proportion模型将结果计算为合并均值。我们确定了59项独立研究。EA的合并R0率为76.6%(71.8 - 81.4%,I² = 91.38%),SA为96.4%(93.6 - 99.2%,I² = 37.8%),PD为98.9%(98.0 - 99.7%,I² = 0%)。AE发生率分别为24.7%(19.8 - 29.6%,I² = 86.4%)、28.3%(19.0 - 37.7%,I² = 76.8%)和44.7%(37.9 - 51.4%,I² = 0%)。复发率分别为13.0%(10.2 - 15.6%,I² = 91.3%)、9.4%(4.8 - 14%,I² = 57.3%)和14.2%(9.5 - 18.9%,I² = 0%)。EA与SA相比,R0的比例差异显著(P = 0.007),与PD相比也显著(P = 0.022)。AE仅在EA和PD之间存在统计学差异(P = 0.049),复发在EA/SA或EA/PD之间无显著差异。我们的数据表明,手术干预中完全切除率增加,但并发症风险更高。然而,研究显示存在各种偏倚来源、数据质量有限且存在显著异质性,尤其是在EA研究中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/7f09beabcce7/jcm-09-03622-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/89aecf711f19/jcm-09-03622-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/66c01c2393cd/jcm-09-03622-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/77a948045a17/jcm-09-03622-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/98a7b11214ed/jcm-09-03622-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/7f09beabcce7/jcm-09-03622-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/89aecf711f19/jcm-09-03622-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/66c01c2393cd/jcm-09-03622-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/77a948045a17/jcm-09-03622-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/98a7b11214ed/jcm-09-03622-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fee/7696506/7f09beabcce7/jcm-09-03622-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Endoscopic and Surgical Resection for Ampullary Lesions.系统评价与荟萃分析:壶腹病变的内镜和手术切除
J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 10;9(11):3622. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113622.
2
Study Protocol of the ESAP Study: Endoscopic Papillectomy vs. Surgical Ampullectomy vs. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampullary Neoplasm-A Pancreas2000/EPC Study.ESAP研究方案:内镜乳头切除术与手术壶腹切除术及胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹肿瘤的比较——一项Pancreas2000/EPC研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 May 6;7:152. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00152. eCollection 2020.
3
Endoscopic Versus Surgical Treatment for Ampullary Lesions: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.壶腹病变的内镜治疗与手术治疗:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jul 22;16(7):e65076. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65076. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Long-term recurrence after endoscopic versus surgical ampullectomy of sporadic ampullary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜与手术切除散发性十二指肠乳头腺瘤后长期复发的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5022-5044. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10083-0. Epub 2023 May 23.
5
Endoscopic or surgical ampullectomy for intramucosal ampullary tumor: the patient populations are not the same.内镜或手术壶腹切除术治疗黏膜内壶腹肿瘤:患者人群并不相同。
J Visc Surg. 2020 Jun;157(3):183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
6
Outcomes of rescue procedures in the management of locally recurrent ampullary tumors: A Pancreas 2000/EPC study.壶腹周围局部复发性肿瘤治疗中挽救性手术的疗效:一项胰腺2000/EPC研究
Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1254-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.12.011. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
7
Endoscopic versus surgical ampullectomy: an algorithm to treat disease of the ampulla of Vater.内镜下与手术切除壶腹:治疗壶腹疾病的算法。
Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):315-22. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318269d010.
8
Endoscopic and Surgical Management of Non-Metastatic Ampullary Neuroendocrine Neoplasia: A Multi-Institutional Pancreas2000/EPC Study.内镜和手术治疗非转移性壶腹神经内分泌肿瘤:多机构胰腺 2000/EPC 研究。
Neuroendocrinology. 2023;113(10):1024-1034. doi: 10.1159/000531712. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
9
Role of transduodenal ampullectomy for tumors of the ampulla of Vater.经十二指肠壶腹切除术在 Vater 壶腹肿瘤治疗中的作用
J Korean Surg Soc. 2011 Oct;81(4):250-6. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.4.250. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
10
Surgical ampullectomy: A comprehensive review.手术性壶腹切除术:全面综述
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov 27;13(11):1338-1350. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1338.

引用本文的文献

1
Endoscopic papillectomy of major papilla lesions: Single tertiary care center experience.十二指肠乳头大病变的内镜下乳头切除术:单一三级医疗中心的经验
Endosc Int Open. 2025 Aug 14;13:a26636291. doi: 10.1055/a-2663-6291. eCollection 2025.
2
Risk factors for recurrence after endoscopic papillectomy in ampullary adenomas: a retrospective case-control study.壶腹腺瘤内镜下乳头切除术术后复发的危险因素:一项回顾性病例对照研究
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Jun 9;18:17562848251343419. doi: 10.1177/17562848251343419. eCollection 2025.
3
Endoscopic Management of Ampullary Adenomas: A Comprehensive Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic papillectomy for neoplastic ampullary lesions: A systematic review with pooled analysis.肿瘤性壶腹病变的内镜乳头切除术:一项汇总分析的系统评价
United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Feb;8(1):44-51. doi: 10.1177/2050640619868367. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
2
Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: the results of a case-matched comparison.机器人辅助与开放性胰十二指肠切除术:病例匹配比较结果
J Robot Surg. 2020 Jun;14(3):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01018-w. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
3
Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: are the best times coming?
壶腹腺瘤的内镜治疗:综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 18;14(10):3532. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103532.
4
Pushing the Boundaries of Ampullectomy for Benign Ampullary Tumors: 25-Year Outcomes of Surgical Ampullary Resection Associated with Duodenectomy or Biliary Resection.突破壶腹良性肿瘤壶腹切除术的界限:与十二指肠切除术或胆道切除术相关的手术性壶腹切除术后25年的结果
J Clin Med. 2024 Nov 27;13(23):7220. doi: 10.3390/jcm13237220.
5
International Digestive Endoscopy Network Consensus on the Management of Antithrombotic Agents in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.国际消化内镜网络共识:胃肠内镜检查中抗栓药物的管理。
Gut Liver. 2024 Sep 15;18(5):764-780. doi: 10.5009/gnl240176. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
6
Endoscopic Versus Surgical Treatment for Ampullary Lesions: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.壶腹病变的内镜治疗与手术治疗:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Cureus. 2024 Jul 22;16(7):e65076. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65076. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
International Digestive Endoscopy Network consensus on the management of antithrombotic agents in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy.国际消化内镜网络关于接受胃肠内镜检查患者抗血栓药物管理的共识
Clin Endosc. 2024 Mar;57(2):141-157. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.002. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
8
Long-term recurrence after endoscopic versus surgical ampullectomy of sporadic ampullary adenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜与手术切除散发性十二指肠乳头腺瘤后长期复发的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5022-5044. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10083-0. Epub 2023 May 23.
9
Clinical outcomes: endoscopic resection of duodenal ampullary lesions.临床结果:十二指肠壶腹病变的内镜切除术
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb 22;8:15. doi: 10.21037/tgh-22-87. eCollection 2023.
10
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary adenoma with high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.内镜乳头切除术治疗伴有高级别异型增生或腺癌的壶腹腺瘤的长期疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 May;37(5):3522-3530. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09856-w. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术:最佳时代是否即将到来?
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 May 10;17(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1624-6.
4
Combined excision and ablation of ampullary tumors with biliary or pancreatic intraductal extension is effective even in malignant neoplasms.联合切除和消融伴有胆管或胰管内扩展的壶腹肿瘤,即使是恶性肿瘤,也是有效的。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Apr;7(3):369-376. doi: 10.1177/2050640618817215. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):54-66. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003309.
6
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤(LEOPARD-2):一项多中心、患者盲法、随机对照 2/3 期试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Mar;4(3):199-207. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30004-4. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Endoscopic resection of advanced ampullary adenomas: a single-center 14-year retrospective cohort study.内镜下切除进展期壶腹腺瘤:单中心 14 年回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):1180-1188. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6392-9. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
8
Expanding the indication of endoscopic papillectomy for T1a ampullary carcinoma.扩大内镜乳头切除术治疗 T1a 壶腹癌的适应证。
Dig Endosc. 2019 Mar;31(2):188-196. doi: 10.1111/den.13265. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
9
Transduodenal ampullectomy for ampullary tumors - single center experience of consecutive 26 patients.经十二指肠壶腹切除术治疗壶腹肿瘤——26例连续病例的单中心经验
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Jul;95(1):22-28. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.95.1.22. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
10
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Argon Plasma Coagulation for Treatment of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.射频消融与氩等离子体凝固治疗胃底静脉曲张的有效性和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;53(8):599-606. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001088.