Suppr超能文献

腹膜炎的开放性治疗:反对观点

Open treatment of peritonitis: an argument against.

作者信息

Kinney E V, Polk H C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Kentucky.

出版信息

Adv Surg. 1988;21:19-27.

PMID:3318311
Abstract

We conclude that open management of advanced peritonitis may provide improved drainage, but it does so at an intolerable cost of increased mechanical lesions, namely, fistulas. The theories of animal investigators need to be tested at the bedside and in the hospital operating room before this idea receives any further consideration. "Semi-open" treatment has been widely and usefully used by many surgeons. Unfortunately, it provides less than total drainage and has its own set of major problems related to mesh removal and/or ultimate wound closure. We think that a better alternative for future controlled study is the sporadically espoused but impressively effective continuing peritoneal lavage with dilute solutions of antibiotics.

摘要

我们得出结论,晚期腹膜炎的开放管理可能会改善引流,但代价是机械性损伤(即瘘管)增加到令人无法忍受的程度。在这个想法得到进一步考虑之前,动物研究者的理论需要在床边和医院手术室进行验证。“半开放”治疗已被许多外科医生广泛且有效地应用。不幸的是,它提供的引流并不彻底,并且存在与移除网片和/或最终伤口闭合相关的一系列重大问题。我们认为,对于未来的对照研究,一个更好的选择是偶尔采用但效果显著的持续用稀释抗生素溶液进行腹膜灌洗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验