Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rheumatology, Nagoya Medical Center, 4-1-1 Sanno-maru, Naka-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Rheumatology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2020 Nov 12;10(1):19717. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76842-4.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of abatacept (ABA) by anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA) status on disease activity as well as radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical settings. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a multicenter registry. Data from a total of 553 consecutive RA patients treated with intravenous ABA were included. We primarily compared the status of disease activity (SDAI) and radiographic progression (van der Heijde modified total Sharp score: mTSS) between the ACPA-negative (N = 107) and ACPA-positive (N = 446) groups. 'ACPA positive' was defined as ≥ 13.5 U/mL of anti-CCP antibody. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar. The proportion of patients who achieved low disease activity (LDA; SDAI ≤ 11) at 52 weeks was significantly higher in the ACPA-positive group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified ACPA positivity as an independent predictor for achievement of LDA at 52 weeks. Drug retention rate at 52 weeks estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve was significantly higher in the ACPA-positive group. Achievement rate of structural remission (ΔmTSS ≤ 0.5) at 52 weeks was similar between groups. ABA treatment demonstrated a significantly higher clinical response and higher drug retention rate in ACPA-positive patients. Progression of joint destruction was similar between the ACPA-negative and ACPA-positive groups. Close attention should be paid to joint destruction even in patients showing a favorable response to ABA, especially when the ACPA status is positive.
本研究旨在评估依那西普(ABA)对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效,特别是根据抗环瓜氨酸肽(ACPA)状态评估其对疾病活动度和影像学进展的影响。本研究采用回顾性队列研究,利用多中心登记处的数据进行分析。共纳入了 553 例接受静脉注射 ABA 治疗的连续 RA 患者的数据。我们主要比较了 ACPA 阴性(N=107)和 ACPA 阳性(N=446)两组之间疾病活动度(SDAI)和影像学进展(van der Heijde 改良总 Sharp 评分:mTSS)的情况。“ACPA 阳性”定义为抗 CCP 抗体≥13.5 U/mL。两组间的基线特征相似。52 周时,达到低疾病活动度(SDAI≤11)的患者比例在 ACPA 阳性组显著更高。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,ACPA 阳性是 52 周时达到低疾病活动度的独立预测因素。Kaplan-Meier 曲线估计的 52 周时药物保留率在 ACPA 阳性组显著更高。52 周时达到结构缓解(ΔmTSS≤0.5)的患者比例在两组间相似。ABA 治疗在 ACPA 阳性患者中表现出更高的临床应答率和更高的药物保留率。两组间关节破坏的进展情况相似。即使在对 ABA 治疗反应良好的患者中,也应密切关注关节破坏情况,特别是在 ACPA 状态为阳性时。