Smits H J H, Seelen-de Lang B L, Nijman H L I, Penterman E J M, Nieuwenhuis J G, Noorthoorn E O
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2020;62(10):868-877.
Little is known about the influence of mild intellectual disability/borderline intellectual functioning (mid/biF) or posttraumatic stress disorder (ptsd) on treatment results in severely mentally ill (smi).
AIM: To investigate whether screeners determining mid/biF or ptsd are associated with less favorable treatment outcome in smi.
METHOD: The screener for intelligence and learning disabilities (scil) was used to screen for mid/biF. The trauma screening questionnaire (tsq) was used to detect ptsd. Outcomes of these screeners were associated with repeated measures on the health of the nation outcome scales (HoNOS) in 628 smi at the Mental Care Centre of Oost Brabant.
RESULTS: In 628 patients one or more HoNOS was acquired. In 352 (56%) patients a scil was acquired, in 334 (53%) patients a tsq. The largest improvement was observed in patients not meeting the criteria for mid/biF and/or ptsd. Less improvement was observed in patients with ptsd and a suspected iq between 70-85, estimated with the scil. No significant change on the HoNOS was observed in patients with an estimated iq below 70.
CONCLUSION: Routine screening for mid/biF and ptsd symptoms is important for early recognition of the disorder, resulting in providing better treatment interventions for patients with mid/biF and ptsd.
关于轻度智力残疾/边缘智力功能(mid/biF)或创伤后应激障碍(ptsd)对重症精神病(smi)治疗效果的影响,人们所知甚少。
目的:调查确定mid/biF或ptsd的筛查工具是否与smi患者较差的治疗结果相关。
方法:使用智力和学习障碍筛查工具(scil)筛查mid/biF。使用创伤筛查问卷(tsq)检测ptsd。这些筛查工具的结果与东布拉班特精神护理中心628名smi患者的国民健康结果量表(HoNOS)重复测量结果相关。
结果:628名患者获得了一项或多项HoNOS评分。352名(56%)患者进行了scil筛查,334名(53%)患者进行了tsq筛查。未达到mid/biF和/或ptsd标准的患者改善最大。scil评估智商疑似在70 - 85之间且患有ptsd的患者改善较小。智商估计低于70的患者HoNOS无显著变化。
结论:对mid/biF和ptsd症状进行常规筛查对于早期识别疾病很重要,从而为mid/biF和ptsd患者提供更好的治疗干预。