Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
American Society of Hypertension Comprehensive Hypertension Center, University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, Illinois.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 Feb;23(2):561-568. doi: 10.1111/dom.14252. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
To evaluate whether atrasentan plasma exposure explains between-patient variability in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) response, a surrogate for kidney protection, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) response, a surrogate for fluid expansion.
Type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 4775) received 0.75 mg atrasentan for 6 weeks in the active run-in period. Individual area under the concentration-time-curve (AUC) was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model. The association between atrasentan AUC, other clinical characteristics, and UACR and BNP response, was estimated using linear regression.
The median atrasentan AUC was 43.8 ng.h/mL with a large variation among patients (2.5th-97.5th percentiles [P]: 12.6 to 197.5 ng.h/mL). Median UACR change at the end of enrichment was -36.0% and median BNP change was 8.7%, which also varied among patients (UACR, 2.5th-97.5th P: -76.2% to 44.5%; BNP, 2.5th-97.5th P: -71.5% to 300.0%). In the multivariable analysis, higher atrasentan AUC was associated with greater UACR reduction (4.88% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% confidence interval {CI}: 6.21% to 3.52%], P < .01) and greater BNP increase (3.08% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% CI: 1.12% to 4.11%], P < .01) independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate, haemoglobin or BNP. Caucasian patients compared with black patients had greater UACR reduction (7.06% [95% CI: 1.38% to 13.07%]) and also greater BNP increase (8.75% [95% CI: 1.65% to 15.35%]). UACR response was not associated with BNP response (r = 0.06).
Atrasentan plasma exposure varied among individual patients and partially explained between-patient variability in efficacy and safety response.
评估阿曲生坦的血药浓度能否解释尿白蛋白与肌酐比值(UACR)的反应(反映肾脏保护的替代指标)和 B 型利钠肽(BNP)的反应(反映液体扩张的替代指标)的个体间差异。
在活性导入期内,4775 名 2 型糖尿病合并慢性肾脏病患者接受了 0.75mg 阿曲生坦治疗 6 周。采用群体药代动力学模型估算个体的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC)。采用线性回归分析阿曲生坦 AUC 与其他临床特征及 UACR 和 BNP 反应之间的关系。
阿曲生坦 AUC 的中位数为 43.8ng·h/mL,个体间差异较大(25%分位数至 75%分位数[P]:12.6 至 197.5ng·h/mL)。富集期末 UACR 变化的中位数为-36.0%,BNP 变化的中位数为 8.7%,个体间也存在差异(UACR,25%分位数至 75%分位数[P]:-76.2%至 44.5%;BNP,25%分位数至 75%分位数[P]:-71.5%至 300.0%)。多变量分析显示,较高的阿曲生坦 AUC 与 UACR 降低幅度更大相关(ng·h/mL 加倍时,UACR 降低 4.88%[95%置信区间{CI}:6.21%至 3.52%],P<0.01),与 BNP 升高幅度更大相关(ng·h/mL 加倍时,BNP 升高 3.08%[95%CI:1.12%至 4.11%],P<0.01),且与估计肾小球滤过率、血红蛋白或 BNP 无关。与黑人患者相比,白人患者的 UACR 降低幅度更大(7.06%[95%CI:1.38%至 13.07%]),BNP 升高幅度也更大(8.75%[95%CI:1.65%至 15.35%])。UACR 反应与 BNP 反应无相关性(r=0.06)。
阿曲生坦的血药浓度在个体间存在差异,部分解释了疗效和安全性反应的个体间差异。