Wiesner Rebecca, Scheller Christin, Krebs Finja, Wätzig Hermann, Oltmann-Norden Imke
Institute of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Electrophoresis. 2021 Feb;42(3):206-218. doi: 10.1002/elps.202000199. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
The development of capillary electrophoresis, especially CE-SDS devices, has led CE-SDS to become an established tool in a wide range of applications in the analysis of biopharmaceuticals and is increasingly replacing its method of origin, SDS-PAGE. The goal of this study was to evaluate the comparability of molecular weight (MW) determination especially by CE-SDS and SDS-PAGE. For ensuring comparability, model proteins that have little or no posttranslational modifications and an IgG antibody were used. Only a minor influence of sample preparation conditions, including sample buffer, temperature conditions, and different reducing agents on the MW determination were found. In contrast, the selection of the MW marker plays a decisive role in determining the accurate apparent MW of a protein. When using different MW markers, the deviation in MW determination can exceed 10%. Interestingly, CE-SDS and 10% SDS-PAGE hardly differ in their trueness of MW determination. The trueness in relation to the reference MW for each protein was calculated. Although the trueness values for the model proteins considered range between 1.00 and 1.11 using CE-SDS, they range between 0.93 and 1.03 on SDS-PAGE, depending on the experimental conditions chosen.
毛细管电泳技术的发展,尤其是CE-SDS设备的发展,使得CE-SDS成为生物制药分析中广泛应用的成熟工具,并日益取代其起源方法SDS-PAGE。本研究的目的是评估特别是通过CE-SDS和SDS-PAGE测定分子量(MW)的可比性。为确保可比性,使用了几乎没有或没有翻译后修饰的模型蛋白和一种IgG抗体。发现样品制备条件,包括样品缓冲液、温度条件和不同的还原剂,对MW测定的影响很小。相比之下,MW标志物的选择在确定蛋白质的准确表观MW中起决定性作用。使用不同的MW标志物时,MW测定的偏差可能超过10%。有趣的是,CE-SDS和10%SDS-PAGE在MW测定的准确性方面几乎没有差异。计算了每种蛋白质相对于参考MW的准确性。尽管使用CE-SDS时,所考虑的模型蛋白的准确性值在1.00至1.11之间,但在SDS-PAGE上,根据所选的实验条件,其准确性值在0.93至1.03之间。