Office of eHealth Research and Business, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
Department of Family Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Republic of Korea.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 13;22(11):e18582. doi: 10.2196/18582.
Although the electronic health record system adoption rate has reached 96% in the United States, implementation and usage of health information exchange (HIE) is still lagging behind. Blockchain has come into the spotlight as a technology to solve this problem. However, there have been no studies assessing the perspectives of different stakeholders regarding blockchain-based patient-centered HIE.
The objective of this study was to analyze the awareness among patients, health care professionals, and information technology developers toward blockchain-based HIE, and compare their different perspectives related to the platform using a qualitative research methodology.
In this qualitative study, we applied grounded theory and the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in the Health Service (PARiHS) framework. We interviewed 7 patients, 7 physicians, and 7 developers, for a total of 21 interviewees.
Regarding the leakage of health information, the patient group did not have concerns in contrast to the physician and developer groups. Physicians were particularly concerned about the fact that errors in the data cannot be easily fixed due to the nature of blockchain technology. Patients were not against the idea of providing information for clinical trials or research institutions. They wished to be provided with the results of clinical research rather than being compensated for providing data. The developers emphasized that blockchain must be technically mature before it can be applied to the health care scene, and standards of medical information to be exchanged must first be established.
The three groups' perceptions of blockchain were generally positive about the idea of patients having the control of sharing their own health information. However, they were skeptical about the cooperation among various institutions and implementation for data standardization in the establishment process, in addition to how the service will be employed in practice. Taking these factors into consideration during planning, development, and operation of a platform will contribute to establishing practical treatment plans and tracking in a more convenient manner for both patients and physicians. Furthermore, it will help expand the related research and health management industry based on blockchain.
尽管电子健康记录系统在美国的采用率已达到 96%,但健康信息交换(HIE)的实施和使用仍较为滞后。区块链已成为解决此问题的热门技术。然而,目前尚无研究评估不同利益相关者对基于区块链的以患者为中心的 HIE 的看法。
本研究旨在分析患者、医疗保健专业人员和信息技术开发人员对基于区块链的 HIE 的认识,并采用定性研究方法比较他们对该平台的不同看法。
在这项定性研究中,我们应用了扎根理论和促进卫生服务研究实施的行动(PARiHS)框架。我们共采访了 7 名患者、7 名医生和 7 名开发人员,总计 21 名受访者。
在健康信息泄露方面,与医生和开发人员群体相比,患者群体没有这方面的担忧。医生特别担心区块链技术的性质使得数据中的错误难以轻易修复。患者并不反对为临床试验或研究机构提供信息的想法。他们希望获得临床研究的结果,而不是因为提供数据而获得补偿。开发人员强调,在将区块链应用于医疗保健场景之前,必须先使其在技术上成熟,并且必须首先建立要交换的医疗信息标准。
这三个群体对患者控制自己健康信息共享的想法普遍持积极态度。然而,他们对各机构之间的合作以及在建立过程中数据标准化的实施持怀疑态度,此外,他们还对该服务在实际中的应用方式持怀疑态度。在平台的规划、开发和运营过程中考虑到这些因素,将有助于以更方便的方式为患者和医生建立更实际的治疗计划和跟踪方案。此外,这将有助于基于区块链扩展相关的研究和健康管理行业。