Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Affiliated with the Hebrew University Medical School of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Department of Nursing, Jerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.
Reprod Sci. 2021 Apr;28(4):1092-1100. doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00378-1. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of parturients attempting trial of labor (TOL) after two previous CD versus those who had an elective third repeat CD. A retrospective computerized database cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary center between 2005 and 2019. Various maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between parturients attempting TOL after two CD versus parturients opting for elective third repeat CD. TOL after two CD was allowed only for those who met all the criteria of our departments' protocol. Parturients with identified contraindication to vaginal delivery were excluded from the analysis. A univariate analysis was conducted and was followed by a multivariate analysis. A total of 2719 eligible births following two CD were identified, of which 485 (17.8%) had attempted TOL. Successful vaginal delivery rate following two CDs was 86.2%. Uterine rupture rates were higher among those attempting TOL (0.6% vs 0.1% p = 0.04). However, rates of hysterectomy, re-laparotomy, blood product infusion, and intensive care unit admission did not differ significantly between the groups. Neonatal outcomes following elective repeat CD were less favorable (specifically, neonatal intensive care unit admission and composite adverse neonatal outcome). Nonetheless, when controlling for potential confounders, an independent association between composite adverse neonatal outcome and an elective repeat CD was not demonstrated. In a subgroup analysis, diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were found independently associated with failed TOLAC. When following a strict protocol, TOL after two CD is a reasonable alternative and associated with favorable outcomes.
本研究旨在评估有两次剖宫产史的产妇尝试试产(TOL)与选择性再次行剖宫产(elective third repeat CD)的母婴结局。本研究采用回顾性计算机数据库队列研究方法,在 2005 年至 2019 年于一家三级中心进行。将有两次剖宫产史的产妇尝试 TOL 与选择再次行剖宫产的产妇进行比较,观察两组的各种母婴结局。只有符合科室方案所有标准的产妇才允许尝试 TOL。将有阴道分娩禁忌证的产妇排除在分析之外。进行单变量分析,然后进行多变量分析。共确定了 2719 例有两次剖宫产史的产妇,其中 485 例(17.8%)尝试过 TOL。两次剖宫产的阴道分娩成功率为 86.2%。尝试 TOL 的产妇中子宫破裂率较高(0.6% vs. 0.1%,p=0.04)。然而,两组的子宫切除术、再次剖腹探查、血制品输注和重症监护病房入院率无显著差异。再次行选择性剖宫产的新生儿结局较差(具体为新生儿重症监护病房入院和复合不良新生儿结局)。然而,在控制潜在混杂因素后,复合不良新生儿结局与再次行选择性剖宫产之间并未显示出独立相关性。在亚组分析中,发现糖尿病和妊娠高血压疾病与 TOLAC 失败独立相关。在严格遵循方案的情况下,两次剖宫产史后行 TOL 是一种合理的替代方案,且结局良好。