Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Apr 15;46(8):E482-E490. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003819.
Retrospective.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of posterior cervical fusion lowest instrumented vertebra (PCF LIV) selection on incidence of mechanical failure, revision surgery, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Recent studies indicate that the LIV in PCF may contribute to the risk of mechanical failure. To date, the evidence available to guide spine surgeons in the selection of PCF LIV remains limited.
All patients undergoing PCF at a single institution were prospectively entered into a spine registry which was retrospectively queried. Data collection included demographics, pathology, operative variables, construct LIV, outcomes of mechanical failure, revision surgery, and patient-reported disability, pain, and quality of life.
Of 438 patients undergoing PCF from 2006 to 2019, 106 patients had an LIV of C7, T1, or T2, a minimum of 1-year follow-up, and met all study inclusion criteria. LIV cohorts were C7 LIV (36), T1 LIV (42), and T2 LIV (28). There were no between-group differences in patient demographics, operative variables, or postoperative follow-up across the three LIV cohorts. Mechanical failure rates for C7, T1, and T2 LIV were 30.6%, 23.8%, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.007). Revision rates for C7, T1, and T2 LIV were 25.0%, 11.9%, and 0%, respectively (P = 0.013). No difference was noted in average time to revision/failure between C7 (39.68 months) and T1 (29.85 months) LIV cohorts. No differences in baseline, 3-month, and 12-month postoperative PRO measures were noted in the C7 and T1 LIV cohort when compared to the T2 LIV cohort.
The findings in this study indicate that PCF LIV selection may play a significant role in the development of mechanical complications and need for revision surgery. T2 LIV selection demonstrated a significantly lower rate of mechanical failure and revision surgery. Postoperative PROs up to 36 months are needed to evaluate effect of LIV selection on PROs.Level of Evidence: 3.
回顾性研究。
本研究旨在评估颈椎后路融合术(PCF)最低固定椎体(PCF LIV)选择对机械失败、翻修手术和患者报告的结果(PROs)的影响。
最近的研究表明,PCF 中的 LIV 可能会增加机械失败的风险。迄今为止,指导脊柱外科医生选择 PCF LIV 的证据仍然有限。
在一家机构进行 PCF 的所有患者都被前瞻性地纳入一个脊柱登记处,该登记处被回顾性查询。数据收集包括人口统计学、病理学、手术变量、融合结构 LIV、机械失败、翻修手术以及患者报告的残疾、疼痛和生活质量的结果。
在 2006 年至 2019 年期间,438 例患者接受了 PCF,其中 106 例 LIV 为 C7、T1 或 T2,至少有 1 年的随访时间,并符合所有研究纳入标准。LIV 队列包括 C7 LIV(36 例)、T1 LIV(42 例)和 T2 LIV(28 例)。在三组 LIV 中,患者的人口统计学、手术变量或术后随访均无组间差异。C7、T1 和 T2 LIV 的机械失败率分别为 30.6%、23.8%和 0%(P=0.007)。C7、T1 和 T2 LIV 的翻修率分别为 25.0%、11.9%和 0%(P=0.013)。C7(39.68 个月)和 T1(29.85 个月)LIV 队列之间没有注意到从翻修/失败的平均时间差异。与 T2 LIV 队列相比,C7 和 T1 LIV 队列的基线、3 个月和 12 个月的术后 PRO 测量值没有差异。
本研究的结果表明,PCF LIV 的选择可能在机械并发症的发生和翻修手术的需求方面发挥重要作用。T2 LIV 的选择显示机械失败和翻修手术的发生率显著降低。需要在 36 个月内进行术后 PRO 评估,以评估 LIV 选择对 PRO 的影响。
3。