Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ; Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine-Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;77(2):139-153. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.09.435. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
We evaluate the effect of implementing the out-of-hospital pediatric traumatic brain injury guidelines on outcomes in children with major traumatic brain injury.
The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care for Children study is the preplanned secondary analysis of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study, a multisystem, intention-to-treat study using a before-after controlled design. This subanalysis included children younger than 18 years who were transported to Level I trauma centers by participating out-of-hospital agencies between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2015, throughout Arizona. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge or admission for children with major traumatic brain injury and in 3 subgroups, defined a priori as those with moderate, severe, and critical traumatic brain injury. Outcomes in the preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts were compared with logistic regression, adjusting for risk factors and confounders.
There were 2,801 subjects, 2,041 in preimplementation and 760 in postimplementation. The primary analysis (postimplementation versus preimplementation) yielded an adjusted odds ratio of 1.16 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.92) for survival to hospital discharge and 2.41 (95% confidence interval 1.17 to 5.21) for survival to hospital admission. In the severe traumatic brain injury cohort (Regional Severity Score-Head 3 or 4), but not the moderate or critical subgroups, survival to discharge significantly improved after guideline implementation (adjusted odds ratio = 8.42; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 100+). The improvement in survival to discharge among patients with severe traumatic brain injury who received positive-pressure ventilation did not reach significance (adjusted odds ratio = 9.13; 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 100+).
Implementation of the pediatric out-of-hospital traumatic brain injury guidelines was not associated with improved survival when the entire spectrum of severity was analyzed as a whole (moderate, severe, and critical). However, both adjusted survival to hospital admission and discharge improved in children with severe traumatic brain injury, indicating a potential severity-based interventional opportunity for guideline effectiveness. These findings support the widespread implementation of the out-of-hospital pediatric traumatic brain injury guidelines.
我们评估在患有严重创伤性脑损伤的儿童中实施院外儿科创伤性脑损伤指南对结局的影响。
卓越院前儿童伤害护理研究(Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care for Children study)是卓越院前儿童伤害护理研究(Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study)的预先计划的二次分析,这是一项多系统、意向性治疗研究,采用前后对照设计。该亚分析包括 2007 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 30 日期间,通过参与的院外机构运往一级创伤中心的年龄小于 18 岁的儿童。主要和次要结局是患有严重创伤性脑损伤的儿童的生存至出院或住院,以及在 3 个亚组中,定义为中度、重度和危重度创伤性脑损伤。通过逻辑回归比较实施前后队列的结局,并调整风险因素和混杂因素。
共有 2801 名受试者,实施前有 2041 名,实施后有 760 名。主要分析(实施后与实施前)得出,出院时的调整比值比为 1.16(95%置信区间为 0.70 至 1.92),住院时的调整比值比为 2.41(95%置信区间为 1.17 至 5.21)。在严重创伤性脑损伤队列(区域严重程度评分-头部 3 或 4)中,但在中度或危急亚组中,指南实施后出院生存率显著提高(调整比值比=8.42;95%置信区间 1.01 至 100+)。在接受正压通气的严重创伤性脑损伤患者中,出院生存率的提高没有达到显著水平(调整比值比=9.13;95%置信区间 0.79 至 100+)。
当分析整个严重程度范围(中度、重度和危急)时,实施儿科院外创伤性脑损伤指南与生存率的提高无关。然而,儿童严重创伤性脑损伤患者的住院和出院调整生存率均有所提高,这表明指南有效性存在潜在的基于严重程度的干预机会。这些发现支持广泛实施院外儿科创伤性脑损伤指南。