Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, College of Medicine-Phoenix, The University of Arizona, Phoenix.
Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
JAMA Surg. 2024 Apr 1;159(4):363-372. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7155.
The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) study demonstrated improved survival in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) following implementation of the prehospital treatment guidelines. The impact of implementing these guidelines in the subgroup of patients who received positive pressure ventilation (PPV) is unknown.
To evaluate the association of implementation of prehospital TBI evidence-based guidelines with survival among patients with prehospital PPV.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The EPIC study was a multisystem, intention-to-treat study using a before/after controlled design. Evidence-based guidelines were implemented by emergency medical service agencies across Arizona. This subanalysis was planned a priori and included participants who received prehospital PPV. Outcomes were compared between the preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts using logistic regression, stratified by predetermined TBI severity categories (moderate, severe, or critical). Data were collected from January 2007 to June 2017, and data were analyzed from January to February 2023.
Implementation of the evidence-based guidelines for the prehospital care of patient with TBI.
The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge, and the secondary outcome was survival to admission.
Among the 21 852 participants in the main study, 5022 received prehospital PPV (preimplementation, 3531 participants; postimplementation, 1491 participants). Of 5022 included participants, 3720 (74.1%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 36 (22-54) years. Across all severities combined, survival to admission improved (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59; 95% CI, 1.28-1.97), while survival to discharge did not (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78-1.13). Within the cohort with severe TBI but not in the moderate or critical subgroups, survival to hospital admission increased (aOR, 6.44; 95% CI, 2.39-22.00), as did survival to discharge (aOR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.96-6.34).
Among patients with severe TBI who received active airway interventions in the field, guideline implementation was independently associated with improved survival to hospital admission and discharge. This was true whether they received basic airway interventions or advanced airways. These findings support the current guideline recommendations for aggressive prevention/correction of hypoxia and hyperventilation in patients with severe TBI, regardless of which airway type is used.
卓越的创伤前护理(EPIC)研究表明,在实施创伤前治疗指南后,严重创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的生存率有所提高。在接受正压通气(PPV)的患者亚组中实施这些指南的影响尚不清楚。
评估院前 TBI 循证指南的实施与院前接受 PPV 的患者的生存率之间的关联。
设计、地点和参与者:EPIC 研究是一项多系统、意向治疗研究,采用前后对照设计。循证指南由亚利桑那州各地的紧急医疗服务机构实施。本亚分析是预先计划的,包括接受院前 PPV 的参与者。使用逻辑回归,根据预先确定的 TBI 严重程度类别(中度、重度或重度),将实施前和实施后队列的结果进行比较。数据于 2007 年 1 月至 2017 年 6 月收集,分析于 2023 年 1 月至 2 月进行。
TBI 患者院前护理循证指南的实施。
主要结局是出院时的生存率,次要结局是入院时的生存率。
在主要研究的 21852 名参与者中,5022 名接受了院前 PPV(实施前 3531 名参与者;实施后 1491 名参与者)。在纳入的 5022 名参与者中,3720 名(74.1%)为男性,中位(IQR)年龄为 36(22-54)岁。在所有严重程度合并组中,入院生存率提高(调整后的优势比[aOR],1.59;95%CI,1.28-1.97),而出院生存率未提高(aOR,0.94;95%CI,0.78-1.13)。在严重 TBI 但非中度或重度亚组的队列中,入院生存率增加(aOR,6.44;95%CI,2.39-22.00),出院生存率也增加(aOR,3.52;95%CI,1.96-6.34)。
在接受主动气道干预的严重 TBI 患者中,指南的实施与入院和出院生存率的提高独立相关。这在他们接受基本气道干预或高级气道干预时都是如此。这些发现支持目前的指南建议,即积极预防/纠正严重 TBI 患者的缺氧和过度通气,无论使用哪种气道类型。