Schaefer Andreas, Conradi Lenard, Schneeberger Yvonne, Reichenspurner Hermann, Sandner Sigrid, Tebbe Ulrich, Nowak Bernd, Stritzke Jan, Kastrati Adnan, Schunkert Heribert, von Scheidt Moritz
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Nov 14. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa330.
In this post hoc analysis of the Ticagrelor in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) trial, we aimed to analyse patients treated with CABG receiving either complete revascularization (CR) or incomplete revascularization (ICR) independent from random allocation to either ticagrelor or aspirin.
Of 1859 patients enrolled in the Ticagrelor in CABG trial, 1550 patients (83.4%) received CR and 309 patients (16.6%) ICR. Outcomes were evaluated regarding all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), repeat revascularization, stroke and bleeding within 12 months after CABG.
Baseline parameters revealed significant differences regarding clinical presentation (stable angina pectoris: CR 68.9% vs ICR 71.2%, instable angina pectoris: 14.1% vs 7.8%, non-ST elevation MI: 17.0% vs 21.0%, P ˂ 0.01), lesion characteristics (chronic total occlusion: CR 91.3% vs ICR 96.8%, P ˂ 0.01), operative technique [off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB): CR 3.0% vs ICR 6.1%, P ˂ 0.01] and number of utilized grafts (total number of grafts: 2.69/patient vs 2.49/patient, P ˂ 0.001). ICR patients displayed a significantly increased risk of repeat revascularization [hazard ratio (HR) 1.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-3.16; P < 0.01] and percutaneous coronary intervention (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.13-3.35; P < 0.05) within 12 months after CABG. Higher risk for repeat revascularization in ICR patients was independent from random allocation to either ticagrelor or aspirin and persisted after adjustment for baseline imbalances.
Patients with ICR presented more stable at the time of admission, but received less grafts, highly likely due to a higher rate of chronic total occlusion lesions and performed OPCAB. Although mortality presented no difference between groups, our results suggest that patients benefit from CR with regard to prevention of repeat revascularization.
在这项关于替格瑞洛在冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中的试验的事后分析中,我们旨在分析接受CABG治疗的患者,无论其被随机分配接受替格瑞洛还是阿司匹林治疗,是接受了完全血运重建(CR)还是不完全血运重建(ICR)。
在CABG试验中纳入的1859例患者中,1550例患者(83.4%)接受了CR,309例患者(16.6%)接受了ICR。对CABG术后12个月内的全因死亡率、心血管死亡、心肌梗死(MI)、再次血运重建、中风和出血情况进行了评估。
基线参数显示,在临床表现方面存在显著差异(稳定型心绞痛:CR为68.9%,ICR为71.2%;不稳定型心绞痛:14.1%对7.8%;非ST段抬高型MI:17.0%对21.0%,P<0.01),病变特征(慢性完全闭塞:CR为91.3%,ICR为96.8%,P<0.01),手术技术[非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB):CR为3.0%,ICR为6.1%,P<0.01]以及使用的移植血管数量(移植血管总数:2.69/例对2.49/例,P<0.001)。ICR患者在CABG术后12个月内再次血运重建的风险显著增加[风险比(HR)1.91,95%置信区间(CI)1.16 - 3.16;P<0.01]以及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的风险增加(HR 1.95,95% CI 1.13 - 3.35;P<0.05)。ICR患者再次血运重建的较高风险与随机分配接受替格瑞洛或阿司匹林无关,并且在对基线不平衡进行调整后仍然存在。
ICR患者入院时表现更为稳定,但接受的移植血管较少,很可能是由于慢性完全闭塞病变的发生率较高以及进行了OPCAB。尽管两组之间死亡率无差异,但我们的结果表明,患者在预防再次血运重建方面从CR中获益。