Sandner Sigrid E, Schunkert Heribert, Kastrati Adnan, Wiedemann Dominik, Misfeld Martin, Böning Andreas, Tebbe Ulrich, Nowak Bernd, Stritzke Jan, Laufer Günther, von Scheidt Moritz
Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Apr 1;57(4):732-739. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz313.
We evaluated the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy on outcomes after multiple arterial grafting (MAG) or single arterial grafting (SAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
In a post hoc, non-randomized analysis of the TiCAB (Ticagrelor in CABG; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01755520) trial, we compared event rates for ticagrelor versus aspirin in patients undergoing MAG and SAG. Primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or repeat revascularization 1 year after CABG. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary end point, all-cause death and bleeding.
Among 1753 patients, 998 patients underwent MAG and 755 patients underwent SAG. There was no significant difference in the 1-year primary composite outcome for ticagrelor versus aspirin with MAG [7.2% vs 7.9%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.43; P = 0.66] or SAG (12.3% vs 8.6%; HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.93-2.31; P = 0.10). Event rates for cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, repeat revascularization and all-cause death were similar for both treatment groups with MAG and SAG. No significant difference in major bleeding was observed for ticagrelor versus aspirin with MAG (2.6% vs 2.7%; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.44-2.05; P = 0.90) or SAG (5.8% vs 4.0%; HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.77-2.89; P = 0.24).
In patients undergoing either MAG or SAG in the TiCAB trial, ticagrelor monotherapy compared with aspirin did not affect the rate of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, stroke or repeat revascularization, or the rate of bleeding, at 1 year after CABG.
我们评估了替格瑞洛单药治疗对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中多支动脉搭桥(MAG)或单支动脉搭桥(SAG)术后结局的影响。
在TiCAB(CABG中的替格瑞洛;ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01755520)试验的事后非随机分析中,我们比较了接受MAG和SAG的患者中替格瑞洛与阿司匹林的事件发生率。主要结局是CABG术后1年时心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、卒中或再次血运重建的复合结局。次要结局包括主要终点的各个组成部分、全因死亡和出血。
在1753例患者中,998例接受了MAG,755例接受了SAG。对于接受MAG的患者,替格瑞洛与阿司匹林相比,1年主要复合结局无显著差异[7.2%对7.9%;风险比(HR)0.90,95%置信区间(CI)0.57 - 1.43;P = 0.66];对于接受SAG的患者也无显著差异(12.3%对8.6%;HR 1.47,95% CI 0.93 - 2.31;P = 0.10)。接受MAG和SAG的两个治疗组中心血管死亡、MI、卒中、再次血运重建和全因死亡的事件发生率相似。对于接受MAG的患者,替格瑞洛与阿司匹林相比,主要出血无显著差异(2.6%对2.7%;HR 0.95,95% CI 0.44 - 2.05;P = 0.90);对于接受SAG的患者也无显著差异(5.8%对4.0%;HR 1.49,95% CI 0.77 - 2.89;P = 0.24)。
在TiCAB试验中接受MAG或SAG的患者中,与阿司匹林相比,替格瑞洛单药治疗在CABG术后1年时不影响心血管死亡、非致死性MI、卒中或再次血运重建的发生率,也不影响出血发生率。