Suppr超能文献

替格瑞洛单药治疗与阿司匹林用于接受多支动脉或单支动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的疗效比较:来自TiCAB试验的见解

Ticagrelor monotherapy versus aspirin in patients undergoing multiple arterial or single arterial coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the TiCAB trial.

作者信息

Sandner Sigrid E, Schunkert Heribert, Kastrati Adnan, Wiedemann Dominik, Misfeld Martin, Böning Andreas, Tebbe Ulrich, Nowak Bernd, Stritzke Jan, Laufer Günther, von Scheidt Moritz

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Apr 1;57(4):732-739. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz313.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy on outcomes after multiple arterial grafting (MAG) or single arterial grafting (SAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

In a post hoc, non-randomized analysis of the TiCAB (Ticagrelor in CABG; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01755520) trial, we compared event rates for ticagrelor versus aspirin in patients undergoing MAG and SAG. Primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or repeat revascularization 1 year after CABG. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary end point, all-cause death and bleeding.

RESULTS

Among 1753 patients, 998 patients underwent MAG and 755 patients underwent SAG. There was no significant difference in the 1-year primary composite outcome for ticagrelor versus aspirin with MAG [7.2% vs 7.9%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.43; P = 0.66] or SAG (12.3% vs 8.6%; HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.93-2.31; P = 0.10). Event rates for cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, repeat revascularization and all-cause death were similar for both treatment groups with MAG and SAG. No significant difference in major bleeding was observed for ticagrelor versus aspirin with MAG (2.6% vs 2.7%; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.44-2.05; P = 0.90) or SAG (5.8% vs 4.0%; HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.77-2.89; P = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing either MAG or SAG in the TiCAB trial, ticagrelor monotherapy compared with aspirin did not affect the rate of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, stroke or repeat revascularization, or the rate of bleeding, at 1 year after CABG.

摘要

目的

我们评估了替格瑞洛单药治疗对冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中多支动脉搭桥(MAG)或单支动脉搭桥(SAG)术后结局的影响。

方法

在TiCAB(CABG中的替格瑞洛;ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01755520)试验的事后非随机分析中,我们比较了接受MAG和SAG的患者中替格瑞洛与阿司匹林的事件发生率。主要结局是CABG术后1年时心血管死亡、非致死性心肌梗死(MI)、卒中或再次血运重建的复合结局。次要结局包括主要终点的各个组成部分、全因死亡和出血。

结果

在1753例患者中,998例接受了MAG,755例接受了SAG。对于接受MAG的患者,替格瑞洛与阿司匹林相比,1年主要复合结局无显著差异[7.2%对7.9%;风险比(HR)0.90,95%置信区间(CI)0.57 - 1.43;P = 0.66];对于接受SAG的患者也无显著差异(12.3%对8.6%;HR 1.47,95% CI 0.93 - 2.31;P = 0.10)。接受MAG和SAG的两个治疗组中心血管死亡、MI、卒中、再次血运重建和全因死亡的事件发生率相似。对于接受MAG的患者,替格瑞洛与阿司匹林相比,主要出血无显著差异(2.6%对2.7%;HR 0.95,95% CI 0.44 - 2.05;P = 0.90);对于接受SAG的患者也无显著差异(5.8%对4.0%;HR 1.49,95% CI 0.77 - 2.89;P = 0.24)。

结论

在TiCAB试验中接受MAG或SAG的患者中,与阿司匹林相比,替格瑞洛单药治疗在CABG术后1年时不影响心血管死亡、非致死性MI、卒中或再次血运重建的发生率,也不影响出血发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验