Carmo-Pereira J, Costa F O, Henriques E, Godinho F, Cantinho-Lopes M G, Sales-Luis A, Rubens R D
Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal.
Br J Cancer. 1987 Oct;56(4):471-3. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1987.226.
Forty-eight patients with advanced breast carcinoma who had not received prior chemotherapy (minimum follow up 21 months) were randomised to receive either adriamycin 70 mg m-2 i.v. 3-weekly for 8 cycles (Regimen A) or adriamycin 35 mg m-2 i.v. 3-weekly for 16 courses (Regimen B). Objective responses were seen in 14/24 (58%) patients with regimen A (4 complete) and 6/24 (25%) with regimen B (1 complete) (P less than 0.02). The median duration of response was 14 months with regimen A and 6.5 months with regimen B. The median duration of survival was 20 months and 8 months respectively (P less than 0.01). The toxicity was similar with each regimen. There was no evidence of deterioration in left ventricular ejection fraction nor congestive heart failure in any patient. It is concluded that when given at 3-weekly intervals adriamycin is a more effective treatment for advanced breast cancer at higher rather than lower dosage.
48例未接受过前期化疗的晚期乳腺癌患者(最短随访21个月)被随机分为两组,一组接受阿霉素70mg/m²静脉注射,每3周1次,共8个周期(方案A);另一组接受阿霉素35mg/m²静脉注射,每3周1次,共16个疗程(方案B)。方案A组24例患者中有14例(58%)出现客观缓解(4例完全缓解),方案B组24例患者中有6例(25%)出现客观缓解(1例完全缓解)(P<0.02)。方案A组缓解的中位持续时间为14个月,方案B组为6.5个月。中位生存期分别为20个月和8个月(P<0.01)。两种方案的毒性相似。未发现任何患者左心室射血分数恶化或出现充血性心力衰竭。结论是,每3周给药一次时,阿霉素用于晚期乳腺癌治疗时,较高剂量比低剂量更有效。