Shah Rucha M, Schmidt Jason, John Elizabeth, Rastegari Sheila, Acharya Priyanka, Kedia Prashant
Department of Gastroenterology, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Department of Pathology, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Clin Endosc. 2021 Sep;54(5):739-744. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.212. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) is an effective and safe method of procuring liver tissue. The aims of this study were to assess and compare the outcomes and tissue adequacy of a single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique between 19 G and 22 G needles in patients undergoing EUS-LB.
We performed a prospective case series study of 20 patients undergoing EUS-LB at a single center between September 2017 and April 2020. The primary objective was to evaluate differences in sample adequacy via a single actuation wet suction technique between a 19 G core needle and a 22 G core needle. Adequacy was gauged by cumulative core biopsy length and the number of portal tracts visualized.
The 19 G needle provided a longer core length (2.5 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p<0.0001), more complete portal tracts (5.8 vs. 1.7, p<0.0001), more total tracts (8.8 vs. 3, p<0.0001), and a longer, intact, fragment length (0.75 cm vs. 0.32 cm, p<0.0006). The 19 G needle was superior in providing adequate (60% vs. 5%, p<0.001) and diagnostic pathologic samples (85% vs. 10%, p<0.001).
A single-pass, single-actuation, wet suction technique using a 19 G needle is superior to that using a 22 G needle for tissue acquisition and sample adequacy in EUS-LB.
背景/目的:内镜超声引导下肝活检(EUS-LB)是获取肝组织的一种有效且安全的方法。本研究的目的是评估和比较接受EUS-LB的患者使用19G和22G针的单次穿刺、单次激发、湿式抽吸技术的结果及组织充足性。
我们对2017年9月至2020年4月在单一中心接受EUS-LB的20例患者进行了一项前瞻性病例系列研究。主要目的是评估19G穿刺针和22G穿刺针通过单次激发湿式抽吸技术在样本充足性方面的差异。充足性通过累积穿刺活检长度和可见门静脉分支数量来衡量。
19G针提供了更长的穿刺长度(2.5厘米对1.2厘米,p<0.0001)、更完整的门静脉分支(5.8对1.7,p<0.0001)、更多的总分支(8.8对3,p<0.0001)以及更长的完整碎片长度(0.75厘米对0.32厘米,p<0.0006)。19G针在提供充足的(60%对5%,p<0.001)和诊断性病理样本(85%对10%,p<0.001)方面更具优势。
在EUS-LB中,使用19G针的单次穿刺、单次激发、湿式抽吸技术在组织获取和样本充足性方面优于使用22G针的技术。