Division of Cardiology and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Section of Cardiology, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;8(12):999-1008. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.09.010. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
This study sought to better understand the discrepant results of 2 trials of serelaxin on acute heart failure (AHF) and short-term mortality after AHF by analyzing causes of death of patients in the RELAX-AHF-2 (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF-2) trial.
Patients with AHF continue to suffer significant short-term mortality, but limited systematic analyses of causes of death in this patient population are available.
Adjudicated cause of death of patients in RELAX-AHF-2, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of serelaxin in patients with AHF across the spectrum of ejection fraction (EF), was analyzed.
By 180 days of follow-up, 11.5% of patients in RELAX-AHF-2 died, primarily due to heart failure (HF) (38% of all deaths). Unlike RELAX-AHF, there was no apparent effect of treatment with serelaxin on any category of cause of death. Older patients (≥75 years) had higher rates of mortality (14.2% vs. 8.8%) and noncardiovascular (CV) death (27% vs. 19%) compared to younger patients. Patients with preserved EF (≥50%) had lower rates of HF-related mortality (30% vs. 40%) but higher non-CV mortality (36% vs. 20%) compared to patients with reduced EF.
Despite previous data suggesting benefit of serelaxin in AHF, treatment with serelaxin was not found to improve overall mortality or have an effect on any category of cause of death in RELAX-AHF-2. Careful adjudication of events in the serelaxin trials showed that older patients and those with preserved EF had fewer deaths from HF or sudden death and more deaths from other CV causes and from noncardiac causes. (Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Serelaxin When Added to Standard Therapy in AHF [RELAX-AHF-2]; NCT01870778).
本研究旨在通过分析 RELAX-AHF-2 试验中患者的死亡原因,更好地了解舒莱辛治疗急性心力衰竭(AHF)的 2 项试验结果以及 AHF 短期死亡率的差异。
AHF 患者的短期死亡率仍然很高,但目前可用的此类患者人群死因的系统分析有限。
对舒莱辛在射血分数(EF)谱内治疗 AHF 患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照 RELAX-AHF-2 试验中患者的死因进行了审查。
在 RELAX-AHF-2 试验的 180 天随访期间,11.5%的患者死亡,主要死因是心力衰竭(HF)(所有死亡人数的 38%)。与 RELAX-AHF 不同,舒莱辛治疗对任何类别的死因均无明显影响。与年轻患者相比,老年(≥75 岁)患者的死亡率(14.2%比 8.8%)和非心血管(CV)死亡率(27%比 19%)更高。射血分数保留(≥50%)的患者因 HF 相关死亡的发生率较低(30%比 40%),但因非 CV 死亡的发生率较高(36%比 20%)。
尽管之前有数据表明舒莱辛对 AHF 有益,但在 RELAX-AHF-2 中,舒莱辛治疗并未发现可改善总体死亡率或对任何死因类别产生影响。对舒莱辛试验中的事件进行仔细审查表明,年龄较大的患者和射血分数保留的患者因 HF 或猝死导致的死亡人数较少,而因其他 CV 原因和非心脏原因导致的死亡人数较多。(舒莱辛添加到 AHF 标准治疗中的疗效、安全性和耐受性[RELAX-AHF-2];NCT01870778)。