Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Fourth Clinical College of Peking University, No. 31 Xinjiekou East Street, Xicheng District, 100035 Beijing, The People's Republic of China.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Fourth Clinical College of Peking University, No. 31 Xinjiekou East Street, Xicheng District, 100035 Beijing, The People's Republic of China.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Dec;106(8):1553-1560. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.07.004. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
Core decompression (CD) is effective in relieving pain and delaying the progression to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the influence of CD on subsequent THA has not yet been established. Therefore, we performed this systematic review to answer: does prior CD have detrimental effect on subsequent THA for ONFH, especially with regards to survivorship and functional results, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications.
After registration on PROSPERO (CRD42019118861), literature published up to and including November 2018 was searched in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases with predetermined terms. Comparative studies on the clinical outcomes between conversion to THA with prior CD (the Prior CD group) and primary THA (the Control group) for ONFH were included. The outcomes of interest included survivorship free from revision, the postoperative functional performance, perioperative and postoperative complications. Data was extracted systematically and a meta-analysis was performed.
Overall, 5 retrospective cohort studies with 110 hips were identified for the Prior CD group and 237 hips were identified for inclusion in the Control group. All of the studies were of high quality in terms of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. No difference in the rate of revision between the two groups (2/42 (4.8%) vs. 4/160 (2.5%); RR=1.92; 95% CI=0.34 to 10.75; p=0.46) was detected after a minimum two-year follow-up. The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was similar between the two groups in all 5 studies. The two groups experienced similar blood loss (Mean difference=12.17ml; 95% CI= -15.28 to 39.61ml; p=0.38). Moreover, intraoperative fracture was increased in the Prior CD group, though this did not reach statistical significance (3/31 (9.7%) vs. 0/55 (0.0%); RR=7.05; 95% CI=0.82 to 60.78; p=0.08). Similarly, osteolysis or radiolucent lines were more likely to occur in the Prior CD group without statistical significance (9/81 (11.1%) vs. 6/200 (3.0%); RR=3.14, 95% CI=0.98 to 10.06; p=0.05).
The present evidence indicated that prior CD does not detrimentally affect the survivorship nor hip scores of subsequent THA. Attention should be paid, however, to the potential for intraoperative fracture, postoperative osteolysis or radiolucent lines.
III; systematic review and meta-analysis of level III retrospective comparative studies.
核心减压术(CD)在缓解疼痛和延缓股骨头坏死(ONFH)患者全髋关节置换术(THA)的进展方面是有效的。然而,CD 对随后 THA 的影响尚未确定。因此,我们进行了这项系统评价,以回答以下问题:对于 ONFH 患者,先前的 CD 是否会对随后的 THA 产生不利影响,特别是在生存率和功能结果以及围手术期和术后并发症方面。
在 PROSPERO(CRD42019118861)上进行注册后,在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中使用预定的术语搜索截至 2018 年 11 月之前发表的文献。纳入了比较先前 CD(CD 组)与初次 THA(对照组)治疗 ONFH 临床结果的回顾性队列研究。感兴趣的结果包括无翻修生存率、术后功能表现、围手术期和术后并发症。系统地提取数据并进行荟萃分析。
总共确定了 5 项回顾性队列研究,其中 CD 组有 110 髋,对照组有 237 髋。所有研究在纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表方面均具有较高的质量。在至少两年的随访后,两组之间的翻修率没有差异(2/42(4.8%)vs. 4/160(2.5%);RR=1.92;95%CI=0.34 至 10.75;p=0.46)。在所有 5 项研究中,两组术后 Harris 髋关节评分均相似。两组的失血量相似(平均差值=12.17ml;95%CI=-15.28 至 39.61ml;p=0.38)。此外,CD 组术中骨折的发生率增加,但无统计学意义(3/31(9.7%)vs. 0/55(0.0%);RR=7.05;95%CI=0.82 至 60.78;p=0.08)。同样,CD 组中更有可能发生骨溶解或透亮线,但无统计学意义(9/81(11.1%)vs. 6/200(3.0%);RR=3.14,95%CI=0.98 至 10.06;p=0.05)。
目前的证据表明,先前的 CD 不会对随后 THA 的生存率和髋关节评分产生不利影响。然而,应注意术中骨折、术后骨溶解或透亮线的潜在风险。
III 级;III 级回顾性比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。