Suppr超能文献

妊娠决策的确定性和意图:一项探索性研究。

Certainty and intention in pregnancy decision-making: An exploratory study.

机构信息

UCB-UCSF Joint Medical Program (JMP), Berkeley, CA, USA.

Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), University of California, Oakland, CA, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2021 Feb;103(2):80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Abortion is often characterized as an inherently difficult decision, despite research demonstrating high decision certainty among abortion patients. Minimal research has examined decision certainty among people planning to continue a pregnancy. We examined whether women seeking abortion experience lower decision certainty than those planning to continue pregnancies and whether certainty differs by pregnancy intendedness.

STUDY DESIGN

We administered the decisional conflict scale (DCS) to pregnant women (n = 149) at 8 U.S. primary and reproductive health clinics. Using Poisson regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and pregnancy characteristics, we evaluated differences in DCS scores (<25/100 vs ≥25/100) by pregnancy decision and whether pregnancy intention modified the effect of pregnancy decision on certainty.

RESULTS

Over one-half (58%) of respondents planned to have an abortion, 32% to continue the pregnancy, and 10% were unsure. DCS scores were low overall (median 9.4/100; IQR: 1.6, 25.0), indicative of high certainty, and the percentage scoring ≥25/100, reflecting any uncertainty, did not differ by pregnancy decision (23% abortion vs 19% continuing, p = 0.55). In a multivariable model, there was no statistically significant interaction between pregnancy decision (abortion vs continuing pregnancy) and intention. However, the predicted percentage reporting any uncertainty among respondents with intended pregnancies was comparable among those decided on abortion (13%) and continuing the pregnancy (16%). Among those with unintended pregnancies, these figures were 25% among those decided on abortion vs 36% among those continuing.

CONCLUSION

Levels of certainty about a pregnancy decision were high and appeared to depend more on whether the pregnancy was intended or unintended than on the pregnancy decision itself.

IMPLICATIONS

Similar levels of uncertainty among individuals who decided to have an abortion versus continue a pregnancy challenge the narrative that abortion is a particularly difficult medical and personal decision. The prevalence of some uncertainty among respondents continuing pregnancies suggests voluntary options counseling may be useful for some patients in prenatal care settings.

摘要

目的

尽管研究表明堕胎患者的决策确定性很高,但堕胎通常被描述为一个困难的决定。很少有研究检查过计划继续怀孕的人的决策确定性。我们研究了寻求堕胎的女性是否比计划继续怀孕的女性经历更低的决策确定性,以及确定性是否因怀孕意图而异。

研究设计

我们在美国 8 家初级和生殖健康诊所向孕妇(n=149)发放了决策冲突量表(DCS)。我们使用泊松回归模型,根据社会人口统计学和妊娠特征进行调整,评估了妊娠决策对 DCS 评分(<25/100 与≥25/100)的差异,以及妊娠决策对确定性的影响是否因妊娠意图而改变。

结果

超过一半(58%)的受访者计划堕胎,32%计划继续怀孕,10%不确定。DCS 评分总体较低(中位数 9.4/100;IQR:1.6,25.0),表明确定性很高,评分≥25/100 的比例(反映任何不确定性)不因妊娠决策(堕胎与继续妊娠)而有所不同(23%堕胎与 19%继续妊娠,p=0.55)。在多变量模型中,妊娠决策(堕胎与继续妊娠)和意图之间没有统计学上显著的交互作用。然而,在决定堕胎和继续妊娠的受访者中,有意愿的妊娠报告任何不确定性的预测百分比是相似的(13%与 16%)。在没有意愿的妊娠中,这些比例在决定堕胎的人中为 25%,在继续妊娠的人中为 36%。

结论

对妊娠决策的确定性水平较高,且似乎更多地取决于妊娠是有意还是无意,而不是妊娠决策本身。

启示

决定堕胎和继续妊娠的个体之间存在相似程度的不确定性,这挑战了堕胎是一个特别困难的医疗和个人决定的说法。在继续妊娠的受访者中存在一定程度的不确定性,这表明在产前保健环境中,自愿选择咨询可能对某些患者有用。

相似文献

1
Certainty and intention in pregnancy decision-making: An exploratory study.妊娠决策的确定性和意图:一项探索性研究。
Contraception. 2021 Feb;103(2):80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
Measuring decisional certainty among women seeking abortion.衡量寻求堕胎的女性的决策确定性。
Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
8
Examining intendedness among pregnancies ending in spontaneous abortion.研究自然流产的妊娠中的意图性。
Contraception. 2017 Aug;96(2):111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 31.

本文引用的文献

2
Decisional Conflict Scale Use over 20 Years: The Anniversary Review.决策冲突量表使用 20 多年:周年回顾。
Med Decis Making. 2019 May;39(4):301-314. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19851345. Epub 2019 May 29.
5
Should prenatal care providers offer pregnancy options counseling?产前护理提供者应提供怀孕选择咨询吗?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Sep 27;18(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-2012-x.
8
Measuring decisional certainty among women seeking abortion.衡量寻求堕胎的女性的决策确定性。
Contraception. 2017 Mar;95(3):269-278. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
9
Pregnancy intentions-a complex construct and call for new measures.怀孕意愿——一个复杂的概念,需要新的衡量方法。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1453-1462. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1067. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
10
Abortion access and state variation in observed unintended pregnancy.人工流产可及性与观察到的意外怀孕的州际差异。
Contraception. 2015 Sep;92(3):227-33. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 Apr 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验