O'Donnell Jenny, Goldberg Alisa, Lieberman Ellice, Betancourt Theresa
a ScD Candidate , Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health , Boston , MA , USA.
b Associate Professor, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology , Brigham and Women's Hospital , Boston , MA , USA.
Reprod Health Matters. 2018 Dec;26(52):1513270. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2018.1513270.
How rurality relates to women's abortion decision-making in the United States remains largely unexplored in existing literature. The present study relies on qualitative methods to analyze rural women's experiences related to pregnancy decision-making and pathways to abortion services in Central Appalachia. This analysis examines narratives from 31 participants who disclosed experiencing an unwanted pregnancy, including those who continued and terminated a pregnancy. Results suggest that women living in rural communities deal with unwanted pregnancy in three phases: (1) the simultaneous assessment of the acceptability of continuing the pregnancy and the acceptability of terminating the pregnancy, (2) deciding whether to seek services, and (3) navigating a pathway to service. Many participants who experience an unwanted pregnancy ultimately decide not to seek abortion services. When women living in rural communities assess their pregnancy as unacceptable but abortion services do not appear feasible to obtain, they adjust their emotional orientation towards continuing pregnancy, shifting the continuation of pregnancy to be an acceptable outcome. The framework developed via this analysis expands the binary constructs around abortion access - for example, decide to seek an abortion/decide not to seek an abortion, obtain abortion services/do not obtain abortion services - and critically captures the dynamic, often internal, calculations women make around unwanted pregnancy. It captures the experiences of rural women, a gap in the current literature.
在美国,乡村地区与女性堕胎决策之间的关系在现有文献中很大程度上仍未得到探讨。本研究采用定性方法,分析阿巴拉契亚中部地区农村女性在怀孕决策及堕胎服务途径方面的经历。该分析考察了31名披露有意外怀孕经历的参与者的叙述,包括那些继续妊娠和终止妊娠的人。结果表明,生活在农村社区的女性应对意外怀孕分为三个阶段:(1)同时评估继续妊娠的可接受性和终止妊娠的可接受性;(2)决定是否寻求服务;(3)寻找服务途径。许多经历意外怀孕的参与者最终决定不寻求堕胎服务。当农村社区的女性认为自己的怀孕不可接受,但又似乎无法获得堕胎服务时,她们会调整对继续妊娠的情感倾向,将继续妊娠转变为一个可接受的结果。通过该分析得出的框架扩展了围绕堕胎获取的二元结构——例如,决定寻求堕胎/决定不寻求堕胎,获得堕胎服务/未获得堕胎服务——并批判性地捕捉了女性围绕意外怀孕所进行的动态的、往往是内心的权衡。它捕捉到了农村女性的经历,这是当前文献中的一个空白。