• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

康复护理试点项目的评估。

Program evaluation of a recuperative care pilot project.

机构信息

Seattle University College of Nursing, Seattle, WA, USA.

Lake City Partners to End Homelessness, Seattle Mennonite Church, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Nurs. 2021 Jan;38(1):93-97. doi: 10.1111/phn.12834. Epub 2020 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1111/phn.12834
PMID:33190328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7983925/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A program evaluation to demonstrate the feasibility of a recuperative care pilot project to address the needs of unhoused individuals.

DESIGN

The study is a descriptive postprogram evaluation.

SAMPLE

A total of 73 referrals were made to the project with 23 admissions.

MEASURE

Data regarding number and type of referrals for admission, cost of respite care per guest and per day, hospital costs avoided, referrals to community services, and discharge destination were collected.

INTERVENTION

A case management care model was used. The project staff included a public health nurse and an outreach worker.

RESULTS

One local hospital accounted for 65% of all admissions. Admitting diagnoses were abscess/wound care (44%) followed by postsurgery recovery (17%). Housing resources (65%) was a common referral with 22% of guests discharged to stable housing. Actual length of stay exceeded the planned length by an average of 24 days. Total cost per guest per day was $157.45 which is an estimated savings to referring acute care facilities of between $18,000 and $48,000 per day.

CONCLUSIONS

The project demonstrated an ability to provide unhoused individuals a place to recuperate following hospitalization in a cost-effective manner. Challenges and recommendations of the program going forward were identified.

摘要

目的

对康复护理试点项目进行方案评估,以满足无家可归者的需求。

设计

本研究为描述性项目后评估。

样本

共有 73 人被转介到该项目,其中 23 人入院。

措施

收集有关入院人数和类型、每位客人和每天的暂息护理费用、避免的住院费用、向社区服务的转介和出院去向的数据。

干预

采用了案例管理护理模式。项目工作人员包括一名公共卫生护士和一名外展工作人员。

结果

当地一家医院占所有入院人数的 65%。入院诊断为脓肿/伤口护理(44%),其次是手术后康复(17%)。住房资源(65%)是常见的转介,有 22%的客人出院到稳定的住房。实际住院时间比计划平均延长了 24 天。每位客人每天的费用为 157.45 美元,这意味着每天为转介的急性护理机构节省了 18000 至 48000 美元。

结论

该项目证明了能够以具有成本效益的方式为无家可归者提供在住院后康复的场所。确定了项目未来的挑战和建议。

相似文献

1
Program evaluation of a recuperative care pilot project.康复护理试点项目的评估。
Public Health Nurs. 2021 Jan;38(1):93-97. doi: 10.1111/phn.12834. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
2
Health care utilization following a homeless medical respite pilot program.一项无家可归者医疗暂托试点项目后的医疗保健利用情况
Public Health Nurs. 2019 May;36(3):296-302. doi: 10.1111/phn.12589. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
3
Day hospital/crisis respite care versus inpatient care, Part II: Service utilization and costs.日间医院/危机缓解护理与住院护理,第二部分:服务利用与成本
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Aug;153(8):1074-83. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.8.1074.
4
Earlier discharge with community-based intervention for low birth weight infants: a randomized trial.低出生体重儿早期出院并进行社区干预:一项随机试验。
Pediatrics. 1993 Jul;92(1):128-34.
5
Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission.住院时长对住院费用的影响极小。
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Aug;191(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00352-5.
6
Cohort study of a specialist social worker intervention on hospital use for patients at risk of long stay.队列研究:专科社工干预对有长期住院风险患者的医院使用情况的影响。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e023127. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023127.
7
Health care utilization and cost after discharge from a mental health hospital; an RCT comparing community residential aftercare and treatment as usual.精神卫生医院出院后的医疗利用和费用;一项比较社区住宅康复治疗和常规治疗的 RCT 研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 12;18(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1941-2.
8
Health Care Utilization and Cost Outcomes of a Comprehensive Dementia Care Program for Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人的综合痴呆症护理计划的医疗保健利用和成本结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Feb 1;179(2):161-166. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5579.
9
A community project to encourage compliance with mental health treatment aftercare.一个鼓励在心理健康治疗后坚持后续护理的社区项目。
Public Health Rep. 1994 Mar-Apr;109(2):153-7.
10
A pilot study: post-acute geriatric rehabilitation versus usual care in skilled nursing facilities.一项试点研究:熟练护理机构中急性后老年康复与常规护理的对比
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;6(5):321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.04.008.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of surgical care for people experiencing homelessness: prevalence, access, and disparities.对无家可归者外科护理的范围审查:患病率、可及性和差异
Can J Surg. 2024 Jan 26;67(1):E27-E39. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004023. Print 2024 Jan-Feb.
2
Community-Based Wound Care Programs for Unhoused Individuals.社区为无家可归者提供的伤口护理计划。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2023 Dec;13(4):604-614. doi: 10.1007/s44197-023-00157-6. Epub 2023 Oct 17.

本文引用的文献

1
The health of homeless people in high-income countries: descriptive epidemiology, health consequences, and clinical and policy recommendations.高收入国家无家可归者的健康:描述性流行病学、健康后果以及临床和政策建议。
Lancet. 2014 Oct 25;384(9953):1529-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61132-6.
2
Medical respite programs for homeless patients: a systematic review.针对无家可归患者的医疗暂托项目:一项系统综述。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013 May;24(2):499-524. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2013.0053.
3
Health status, quality of life, residential stability, substance use, and health care utilization among adults applying to a supportive housing program.申请保障性住房项目的成年人的健康状况、生活质量、居住稳定性、物质使用和医疗保健利用情况。
J Urban Health. 2011 Dec;88(6):1076-90. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9592-3.
4
The effects of respite care for homeless patients: a cohort study.为无家可归患者提供临时护理的效果:一项队列研究。
Am J Public Health. 2006 Jul;96(7):1278-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.067850. Epub 2006 May 30.