Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中老年抑郁症协作照护模式下的利用类型及治疗反应类型

Types of Utilization and Types of Treatment Response in a Collaborative Care Approach for Depressive Disorders in Old Age in Primary Care.

作者信息

Kloppe Thomas, Pohontsch Nadine Janis, Scherer Martin

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 23;11:565929. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.565929. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Treatment of depressive disorders in old age is hindered by several barriers. Most common are time pressure in primary care and latency for specialized therapeutic care. To improve treatment, the collaborative care approach GermanIMPACT was evaluated in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Care managers offered a complex stepped-care intervention of monitoring, psychoeducation, and behavioral activation techniques. Twenty-six percent of the intervention group responds with a remission of depressive symptoms compared with 11% who received treatment as usual (TAU). The low-threshold intervention was more successful than TAU. Nevertheless, three-quarters did not respond with a remission. The aim of this study is to identify and describe the different types of utilization and of treatment response to understand what constitutes an effective intervention. Of 64 patients from the intervention group, we carried out problem-centered interviews with 26 patients from the intervention group. We analyzed the interviews using a qualitative type-building content analysis. For type construction, we performed a contrasting case comparison, regarding inductive and deductive categories of the intervention utilization and the symptom development. The 26 participants' ages ranged from 62 to 87 years (mean = 72 years). Three participants were male. We identified five types of utilization, which differ primarily in the realization of pleasant activations, depending on own activity at the beginning and during the therapy: "activatable relief seekers," "active relief seekers," "active relaxation seekers," "passive problem-solving seekers," and "passive relief seekers." In the second typology, we analyzed four deductively determined types of treatment response , and . Patient-specific characteristics are a recent history of depression, an affinity for activities, supportive contacts, and limited comorbidity. In contrast, non-responders report contrary characteristics. Our two typologies emphasize that an effective intervention requires a match between intervention components and patient characteristics. We saw no intersections between utilization and treatment response. GermanIMPACT is an effective low-threshold intervention for moderately burdened patients, who are still capable of self-activation. An expansion of the intervention, especially for depression with a long history and comorbidities impairing mobility, could increase the effectiveness and improve the care situation of older people suffering from depression.

摘要

老年抑郁症的治疗受到多种障碍的阻碍。最常见的是初级保健中的时间压力以及获得专业治疗护理的延迟。为了改善治疗效果,在一项整群随机对照试验中对德国IMPACT协作护理方法进行了评估。护理经理提供了一种复杂的逐步护理干预措施,包括监测、心理教育和行为激活技术。干预组中有26%的患者抑郁症状缓解,而接受常规治疗(TAU)的患者中这一比例为11%。低门槛干预比常规治疗更成功。然而,四分之三的患者没有出现症状缓解。本研究的目的是识别和描述不同类型的治疗利用情况和治疗反应,以了解有效干预的构成要素。在干预组的64名患者中,我们对其中26名患者进行了以问题为中心的访谈。我们使用定性类型构建内容分析法对访谈进行了分析。为了构建类型,我们进行了对比案例比较,涉及干预利用和症状发展的归纳和演绎类别。26名参与者的年龄在62岁至87岁之间(平均年龄 = 72岁)。三名参与者为男性。我们确定了五种利用类型,它们主要在愉快活动的实现方面存在差异,这取决于治疗开始时和治疗期间自身的活动情况:“可激活的缓解寻求者”、“积极的缓解寻求者”、“积极的放松寻求者”、“被动的问题解决寻求者”和“被动的缓解寻求者”。在第二种类型分析中,我们分析了四种通过演绎确定的治疗反应类型。患者的特定特征包括近期抑郁症病史、对活动的亲和力、支持性的人际关系以及有限的合并症。相比之下,无反应者报告的特征则相反。我们的两种类型分析强调,有效的干预需要干预成分与患者特征相匹配。我们没有发现利用类型和治疗反应之间的交叉情况。德国IMPACT对于负担中等且仍有自我激活能力的患者是一种有效的低门槛干预措施。扩大干预范围,特别是针对病史较长且合并症影响行动能力的抑郁症患者,可能会提高有效性并改善老年抑郁症患者的护理状况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8036/7644545/21a022dde2e3/fpsyt-11-565929-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验