Suppr超能文献

中国老年人群体队列中10年卒中预测评分的验证

Validation of 10-Year Stroke Prediction Scores in a Community-Based Cohort of Chinese Older Adults.

作者信息

Zhang Yanlei, Fang Xianghua, Guan Shaochen, Wu Xiaoguang, Liu Hongjun, Wang Chunxiu, Zhang Zhongying, Gu Xiang, Liu Chunxiao, Cheng Jianhua

机构信息

Department of Neurology, the First affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Evidence-based Medical Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 22;11:986. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00986. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

A stroke prediction model based on the Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in China (China-PAR) project was developed. We compared its predictive ability with the revised Framingham Stroke Risk Score (R-FSRS) for 5-year stroke incidence in a community cohort of Chinese adults, namely the Beijing Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). Calibration, discrimination, and recalibration were used to compare the predictive ability between the two prediction models. Category-less net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) values were also assessed. During a mean follow-up duration of 5.1 years, 106 incidents of fatal or non-fatal strokes occurred among 1,203 participants aged 55-84 years. The R-FSRS applied to our cohort underestimated the 5-year risk for stroke in men and women. China-PAR performed better than the R-FSRS in terms of calibration (men, R-FSRS: χ-value 144.2 [ < 0.001], China-PAR: 10.4 [ = 0.238]; women, R-FSRS: 280.1 [ < 0.001], China-PAR: 12.5 [ = 0.129]). In terms of discrimination, R-FSRS and China-PAR models performed modestly in our cohort (C-statistic 0.603 [95% CI: 0.560-0.644] for men using China-PAR and 0.568 [95% CI: 0.524-0.610] using the R-FSRS; the corresponding numbers for women were 0.602 [95% CI: 0.564-0.639] and 0.575 [95% CI: 0.537-0.613). The recalibrated China-PAR model significantly improved the discrimination in C statistics and produced higher category-less NRI and IDI for stroke incidence than the R-FSRS. Although China-PAR fairly estimated stroke risk in our cohort, it did not sufficiently identify adults at high risk of stroke. Caution would be exercised by practitioners in applying the original China-PAR to Chinese older adults. Further studies are needed to develop an adequate prediction model based on the recalibrated China-PAR or to find new risk markers which could upgrade this model.

摘要

基于中国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险预测(China-PAR)项目开发了一种中风预测模型。我们在中国成年人社区队列(即北京老龄化纵向研究,BLSA)中,将其预测能力与修订后的弗雷明汉姆中风风险评分(R-FSRS)对5年中风发病率的预测能力进行了比较。采用校准、区分度和重新校准来比较这两种预测模型的预测能力。还评估了无类别净重新分类改善(NRI)和综合区分改善(IDI)值。在平均5.1年的随访期间,1203名年龄在55 - 84岁的参与者中发生了106例致命或非致命中风事件。应用于我们队列的R-FSRS低估了男性和女性的5年中风风险。China-PAR在校准方面比R-FSRS表现更好(男性,R-FSRS:χ值144.2[<0.001],China-PAR:10.4[=0.238];女性,R-FSRS:280.1[<0.001],China-PAR:12.5[=0.129])。在区分度方面,R-FSRS和China-PAR模型在我们的队列中表现一般(使用China-PAR的男性C统计量为0.603[95%CI:0.560 - 0.644],使用R-FSRS的为0.568[95%CI:0.524 - 0.610];女性相应数字分别为0.602[95%CI:0.564 - 0.639]和0.575[95%CI:0.537 - 0.613])。重新校准后的China-PAR模型在C统计量的区分度方面有显著改善,并且在中风发病率方面产生了比R-FSRS更高的无类别NRI和IDI。尽管China-PAR在我们的队列中对中风风险进行了合理估计,但它没有充分识别出中风高风险的成年人。从业者在将原始的China-PAR应用于中国老年人时应谨慎。需要进一步研究以基于重新校准后的China-PAR开发一个合适的预测模型,或者找到可以升级该模型的新风险标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/921c/7642878/5e45d220d618/fneur-11-00986-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验