Hamaguchi Toyohiro, Yamada Naoki, Hada Takuya, Abo Masahiro
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, Japan.
Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 20;11:581186. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.581186. eCollection 2020.
Recovery from motor paralysis is facilitated by affected patients' recognition of the need for and practice of their own exercise goals. Neurorehabilitation has been proposed and used for the treatment of motor paralysis in stroke, and its effect has been verified. If an expected score for the neurorehabilitation effect can be calculated using the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA), a global assessment index, before neurorehabilitation, such a score will be useful for optimizing the treatment application criteria and for setting a goal to enhance the treatment effect. Therefore, this study verified whether the responsiveness to a treatment method, the NovEl intervention using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and occupational therapy (NEURO), in patients with post-stroke upper extremity (UE) motor paralysis could be predicted by the pretreatment FMA score. No control group was established in this study for NEURO treatment. To analyze the recovery of the motor function in the UE, delta-FMA was calculated from the pre- and post-FMA scores obtained during NEURO treatment. The probability of three levels of treatment responsiveness was evaluated in association with delta-FMA score (<5, 5 ≤ delta-FMA <10, and ≥10 as non-responders; responders; and hyper-responders, respectively) according to the reported minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The association of the initial FMA scores with post-FMA scores, from the status of the treatment responsiveness, was determined by multinomial logistic regression analysis. Finally, 1,254 patients with stroke, stratified by FMA scores were analyzed. About 45% of the patients who had FMA scores ranging from 30 to 40 before treatment showed improvement over the MCID by NEURO treatment (odds ratio = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.92-0.95). Furthermore, more than 25% of the patients with more severe initial values, ranging from 26 to 30, improved beyond the MCID calculated in the acute phase (odds ratio = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.85-0.89). These results suggest that the evaluated motor function score of the UE before NEURO treatment can be used to estimate the possibility of a patient recovering beyond MCID in the chronic phase. This study provided clinical data to estimate the effect of NEURO treatment by the pretreatment FMA-UE score.
受影响患者认识到自身运动目标的必要性并进行实践,有助于运动麻痹的恢复。神经康复已被提出并用于治疗中风后的运动麻痹,其效果已得到验证。如果在神经康复前能使用全球评估指标Fugl - Meyer运动评估(FMA)计算出神经康复效果的预期评分,那么这样的评分将有助于优化治疗应用标准并设定提高治疗效果的目标。因此,本研究验证了中风后上肢(UE)运动麻痹患者对一种治疗方法——使用重复经颅磁刺激和职业治疗的NovEl干预(NEURO)的反应性是否可以通过治疗前的FMA评分来预测。本研究未为NEURO治疗设立对照组。为了分析UE运动功能的恢复情况,从NEURO治疗期间获得的FMA评分的前后值计算出delta - FMA。根据报告的最小临床重要差异(MCID),结合delta - FMA评分(分别以<5、5≤delta - FMA<10和≥10作为无反应者、反应者和高反应者)评估了三个治疗反应水平的概率。通过多项逻辑回归分析确定了初始FMA评分与治疗反应状态下的FMA后评分之间的关联。最后,对1254例按FMA评分分层的中风患者进行了分析。治疗前FMA评分在30至40之间的患者中,约45%经NEURO治疗后改善超过MCID(优势比 = 0.93,95%置信区间 = 0.92 - 0.95)。此外,初始值更严重(在26至30之间)的患者中,超过25%的患者改善超过急性期计算出的MCID(优势比 = 0.87,95%置信区间 = 0.85 - 0.89)。这些结果表明,NEURO治疗前评估的UE运动功能评分可用于估计患者在慢性期恢复超过MCID的可能性。本研究提供了临床数据,以通过治疗前FMA - UE评分估计NEURO治疗的效果。