Suppr超能文献

以癫痫为表现的脑海绵状血管畸形的治疗:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Treatment of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations Presenting With Seizures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Gao Xiangyu, Yue Kangyi, Sun Jidong, Cao Yuan, Zhao Boyan, Zhang Haofuzi, Dai Shuhui, Zhang Lei, Luo Peng, Jiang Xiaofan

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 26;11:590589. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.590589. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) presenting with seizures can be treated with neurosurgery or radiosurgery, but the ideal treatment remains unclear. Currently, there is no adequate randomized controlled trial comparing surgical treatment and radiotherapy for epileptogenic CCMs. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available data from published literature to compare the efficacy and safety of neurosurgery and radiosurgery for epileptogenic CCMs. We performed a comprehensive search of the Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, PubMed, China Biological Medicine and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for studies published between January 1994 and October 2019. The search terms were as follows: "epilepsy," "seizures," "brain cavernous hemangioma," "cerebral cavernous malformation," "cerebral cavernous hemangioma," "hemangioma, cavernous, central nervous system." Two researchers independently extracted the data and reviewed all the articles. We compared the advantages and disadvantages of the two treatments. A total of 45 studies were included in our analysis. Overall, the seizure control rate was 79% (95% CI: 75-83%) for neurosurgery and 49% (95% CI: 38-59%) for radiosurgery. In the neurosurgery studies, 4.4% of patients experienced permanent morbidity, while no patients in the radiotherapy studies had permanent morbidity. In addition, the results of subgroup analysis showed that ethnicity, CCMs location and average lesion number are likely significant factors influencing the seizure outcome following treatment. The epilepsy control rate after neurosurgery was higher than that after radiosurgery, but neurosurgery also had a relatively higher rate of permanent morbidity.

摘要

以癫痫发作为表现的脑海绵状血管畸形(CCM)可采用神经外科手术或放射外科治疗,但理想的治疗方法仍不明确。目前,尚无足够的随机对照试验比较手术治疗和放射治疗对致痫性CCM的疗效。因此,我们对已发表文献中的可用数据进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较神经外科手术和放射外科治疗致痫性CCM的疗效和安全性。我们全面检索了Ovid MEDLINE、科学网、PubMed、中国生物医学数据库和中国知网数据库,查找1994年1月至2019年10月发表的研究。检索词如下:“癫痫”“癫痫发作”“脑海绵状血管瘤”“脑海绵状血管畸形”“脑海绵状血管瘤”“海绵状血管瘤,中枢神经系统”。两名研究人员独立提取数据并审阅所有文章。我们比较了两种治疗方法的优缺点。我们的分析共纳入45项研究。总体而言,神经外科手术的癫痫控制率为79%(95%CI:75-83%),放射外科手术的癫痫控制率为49%(95%CI:38-59%)。在神经外科手术研究中,4.4%的患者出现永久性并发症,而放射治疗研究中没有患者出现永久性并发症。此外,亚组分析结果表明,种族、CCM位置和平均病变数量可能是影响治疗后癫痫发作结局的重要因素。神经外科手术后的癫痫控制率高于放射外科手术,但神经外科手术的永久性并发症发生率也相对较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6a1/7649328/f64aeb34d2ae/fneur-11-590589-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验