Lambert Calista J, Hooper Stuart B, Te Pas Arjan B, McGillick Erin V
The Ritchie Centre Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
The Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Pediatr. 2020 Oct 29;8:516698. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.516698. eCollection 2020.
Respiratory support is critically important for survival of newborns who fail to breathe spontaneously at birth. Although there is no internationally accepted definition of a sustained inflation (SI), it has commonly been defined as a positive pressure inflation designed to establish functional residual capacity and applied over a longer time period than normally used in standard respiratory support (SRS). Outcomes vary distinctly between studies and to date there has been no comprehensive investigation of differences in SI approach and study outcome in both pre-clinical and clinical studies. A systematic literature search was performed and, after screening, identified 17 animal studies and 17 clinical studies evaluating use of a SI in newborns compared to SRS during neonatal resuscitation. Study demographics including gestational age, SI parameters (length, repetitions, pressure, method of delivery) and study outcomes were compared. Animal studies provide mechanistic understanding of a SI on the physiology underpinning the cardiorespiratory transition at birth. In clinical studies, there is considerable difference in study quality, delivery of SIs (number, pressure, length) and timing of primary outcome evaluation which limits direct comparison between studies. The largest difference is method of delivery, where the role of a SI has been observed in intubated animals, as the inflation pressure is directly applied to the lung, bypassing the obstructed upper airway in an apnoeic state. This highlights a potential limitation in clinical use of a SI applied non-invasively. Further research is required to identify if a SI may have greater benefits in subpopulations of newborns.
呼吸支持对于出生时不能自主呼吸的新生儿的存活至关重要。尽管目前尚无国际公认的持续充气(SI)的定义,但通常将其定义为旨在建立功能残气量的正压充气,且应用时间比标准呼吸支持(SRS)中通常使用的时间更长。不同研究的结果差异明显,迄今为止,尚未对临床前和临床研究中SI方法与研究结果的差异进行全面调查。我们进行了系统的文献检索,经筛选后,确定了17项动物研究和17项临床研究,这些研究评估了在新生儿复苏过程中,与SRS相比,SI在新生儿中的应用情况。对研究人口统计学数据进行了比较,包括胎龄、SI参数(持续时间、重复次数、压力、施加方法)和研究结果。动物研究为SI对出生时心肺过渡生理机制的影响提供了理论理解。在临床研究中,研究质量、SI的施加(次数、压力、持续时间)以及主要结局评估时间存在很大差异,这限制了不同研究之间的直接比较。最大的差异在于施加方法,在插管动物中观察到了SI的作用,因为充气压力直接作用于肺部,绕过了呼吸暂停状态下阻塞的上气道。这凸显了无创应用SI在临床中的潜在局限性。需要进一步研究以确定SI是否可能在新生儿亚群体中具有更大的益处。