Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Department of Psychology and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 16;22(11):e20709. doi: 10.2196/20709.
eHealth mindfulness-based programs (eMBPs) are on the rise in complex oncology and palliative care. However, we are still at the beginning of answering the questions of how effective eMBPs are and for whom, and what kinds of delivery modes are the most efficient.
This systematic review aims to examine the feasibility and efficacy of eMBPs in improving the mental health and well-being of patients with cancer, to describe intervention characteristics and delivery modes of these programs, and to summarize the results of the included studies in terms of moderators, mediators, and predictors of efficacy, adherence, and attrition.
In total, 4 databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge) were searched using relevant search terms (eg, mindfulness, program, eHealth, neoplasm) and their variations. No restrictions were imposed on language or publication type. The results of the efficacy of eMBPs were synthesized through the summarizing effect estimates method.
A total of 29 published papers describing 24 original studies were included in this review. In general, the results indicate that eMBPs have the potential to reduce the levels of stress, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep problems, and pain, and improve the levels of mindfulness, posttraumatic growth, and some parameters of general health. The largest median of Cohen d effect sizes were observed in reducing anxiety and depression (within-subject: median -0.38, IQR -0.62 to -0.27; between-group: median -0.42, IQR -0.58 to -0.22) and facilitating posttraumatic growth (within-subject: median 0.42, IQR 0.35 to 0.48; between-group: median 0.32, IQR 0.22 to 0.39). The efficacy of eMBP may be comparable with that of parallel, face-to-face MBPs in some cases. All studies that evaluated the feasibility of eMBPs reported that they are feasible for patients with cancer. Potential moderators, mediators, and predictors of the efficacy, attrition, and adherence of eMBPs are discussed.
Although the effects of the reviewed studies were highly heterogeneous, the review provides evidence that eMBPs are an appropriate way for mindfulness practice to be delivered to patients with cancer. Thus far, existing eMBPs have mostly attempted to convert proven face-to-face mindfulness programs to the eHealth mode. They have not yet fully exploited the potential of eHealth technology.
电子健康正念为基础的项目(eMBP)在复杂的肿瘤学和姑息治疗中越来越受欢迎。然而,我们仍处于回答 eMBP 有效性和适用人群、何种交付模式最有效的问题的开始阶段。
本系统评价旨在研究电子 MBPs 改善癌症患者心理健康和幸福感的可行性和效果,描述这些项目的干预特点和交付模式,并总结纳入研究在疗效、依从性和脱落的调节因素、中介因素和预测因素方面的结果。
共检索了 4 个数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 Web of Knowledge),使用相关检索词(如正念、计划、电子健康、肿瘤)及其变体进行检索。对语言和出版类型没有限制。通过总结效应估计方法综合了 eMBP 疗效的结果。
本综述共纳入 29 篇描述 24 项原始研究的已发表论文。总体而言,结果表明 eMBP 有潜力降低压力、焦虑、抑郁、疲劳、睡眠问题和疼痛水平,提高正念、创伤后成长和一些一般健康参数水平。在降低焦虑和抑郁方面观察到最大的 Cohen d 效应量中位数(自身比较:中位数-0.38,IQR-0.62 至-0.27;组间比较:中位数-0.42,IQR-0.58 至-0.22)和促进创伤后成长(自身比较:中位数 0.42,IQR 0.35 至 0.48;组间比较:中位数 0.32,IQR 0.22 至 0.39)。在某些情况下,eMBP 的疗效可能与平行的面对面 MBPs 相当。所有评估 eMBP 可行性的研究都报告说,它们对癌症患者是可行的。讨论了 eMBP 疗效、脱落和依从性的潜在调节因素、中介因素和预测因素。
尽管研究的效果高度异质,但本综述提供了证据表明 eMBP 是向癌症患者提供正念实践的合适方式。到目前为止,现有的 eMBP 大多试图将已证实的面对面正念项目转换为电子健康模式。它们尚未充分利用电子健康技术的潜力。