Suppr超能文献

采用能量、(火用)、经济和环境(4E)方法评估不同空气质量比下的双通针肋太阳能空气加热器。

Assessment of double-pass pin finned solar air heater at different air mass ratios via energy, exergy, economic, and environmental (4E) approaches.

机构信息

Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Benha Faculty of Engineering, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(11):13776-13789. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11628-9. Epub 2020 Nov 16.

Abstract

In this study, an assessment based on energy, exergy, economic, and environmental approaches on a double-pass (DP) solar air heater (SAH) having pin finned absorber at different air mass ratios up and down the absorber is investigated experimentally. Four air mass ratios are considered: (i) all the air mass flow passes up the absorber and returns to pass down the absorber (DP), (ii) 2/3 of the airflow passes up the absorber and returns to mix with the remainder of air to pass down the absorber (2/3 DP), (iii) the same as (ii) but 1/3 of the air passes up the absorber (1/3 DP), and (iv) all the air mass passes only down the absorber (single pass, SP). For all mass ratios, the performance of pin finned SAH (P_SAH) is compared with that of flat SAH (F_SAH). The results indicated that the air temperature rise and energy and exergy efficiencies of P_SAH are highly greater than those of F_SAH. The highest average thermal efficiency of F_SAH is 56.7% obtained at DP flow condition, whereas the highest value of P_SAH is 65.21% obtained at 2/3 DP with an increase of 17.6% compared with F_SAH. Also, P_SAH has higher average exergy efficiency of about 34.7% compared to F_SAH. Furthermore, P_SAH achieves energy payback time (EPBT) lower than that of F_SAH, while P_SAH has higher embodied energy. The findings indicated that F_SAH at SP airflow pattern has the maximum energy cost (0.0427 $/kWh), whereas P_SAH at 2/3 DP airflow pattern achieves the minimum energy cost (0.037 $/kWh). Finally, the proposed P_SAH system appears to be more viable from exergoeconomic and enviroeconomic approaches compared to F_SAH.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们通过实验对具有针翅式吸收器的双通(DP)太阳能空气加热器(SAH)进行了能量、火用、经济和环境方面的评估,研究了不同空气质量比上下流过吸收器的情况。我们考虑了四种空气质量比:(i)所有空气质量流都通过吸收器向上流动,然后返回向下流动(DP);(ii)2/3 的空气流量通过吸收器向上流动,然后与其余空气混合向下流动(2/3 DP);(iii)与(ii)相同,但 1/3 的空气通过吸收器向上流动(1/3 DP);(iv)所有空气质量仅向下流动(单程,SP)。对于所有质量比,我们比较了针翅式 SAH(P_SAH)和平面 SAH(F_SAH)的性能。结果表明,P_SAH 的空气温度升高、能量和火用效率都远高于 F_SAH。F_SAH 的最高平均热效率为 56.7%,在 DP 流动条件下获得,而 P_SAH 的最高值为 65.21%,在 2/3 DP 下获得,与 F_SAH 相比增加了 17.6%。此外,P_SAH 的平均火用效率约为 34.7%,高于 F_SAH。此外,P_SAH 的能量回报时间(EPBT)低于 F_SAH,而 P_SAH 的嵌入能量较高。研究结果表明,在 SP 气流模式下,F_SAH 的能量成本最高(0.0427 美元/千瓦时),而在 2/3 DP 气流模式下,P_SAH 的能量成本最低(0.037 美元/千瓦时)。最后,与 F_SAH 相比,从火用经济和环境经济的角度来看,提出的 P_SAH 系统似乎更可行。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验