Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Benha Faculty of Engineering, Benha University, Benha, Egypt.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(11):13776-13789. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11628-9. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
In this study, an assessment based on energy, exergy, economic, and environmental approaches on a double-pass (DP) solar air heater (SAH) having pin finned absorber at different air mass ratios up and down the absorber is investigated experimentally. Four air mass ratios are considered: (i) all the air mass flow passes up the absorber and returns to pass down the absorber (DP), (ii) 2/3 of the airflow passes up the absorber and returns to mix with the remainder of air to pass down the absorber (2/3 DP), (iii) the same as (ii) but 1/3 of the air passes up the absorber (1/3 DP), and (iv) all the air mass passes only down the absorber (single pass, SP). For all mass ratios, the performance of pin finned SAH (P_SAH) is compared with that of flat SAH (F_SAH). The results indicated that the air temperature rise and energy and exergy efficiencies of P_SAH are highly greater than those of F_SAH. The highest average thermal efficiency of F_SAH is 56.7% obtained at DP flow condition, whereas the highest value of P_SAH is 65.21% obtained at 2/3 DP with an increase of 17.6% compared with F_SAH. Also, P_SAH has higher average exergy efficiency of about 34.7% compared to F_SAH. Furthermore, P_SAH achieves energy payback time (EPBT) lower than that of F_SAH, while P_SAH has higher embodied energy. The findings indicated that F_SAH at SP airflow pattern has the maximum energy cost (0.0427 $/kWh), whereas P_SAH at 2/3 DP airflow pattern achieves the minimum energy cost (0.037 $/kWh). Finally, the proposed P_SAH system appears to be more viable from exergoeconomic and enviroeconomic approaches compared to F_SAH.
在这项研究中,我们通过实验对具有针翅式吸收器的双通(DP)太阳能空气加热器(SAH)进行了能量、火用、经济和环境方面的评估,研究了不同空气质量比上下流过吸收器的情况。我们考虑了四种空气质量比:(i)所有空气质量流都通过吸收器向上流动,然后返回向下流动(DP);(ii)2/3 的空气流量通过吸收器向上流动,然后与其余空气混合向下流动(2/3 DP);(iii)与(ii)相同,但 1/3 的空气通过吸收器向上流动(1/3 DP);(iv)所有空气质量仅向下流动(单程,SP)。对于所有质量比,我们比较了针翅式 SAH(P_SAH)和平面 SAH(F_SAH)的性能。结果表明,P_SAH 的空气温度升高、能量和火用效率都远高于 F_SAH。F_SAH 的最高平均热效率为 56.7%,在 DP 流动条件下获得,而 P_SAH 的最高值为 65.21%,在 2/3 DP 下获得,与 F_SAH 相比增加了 17.6%。此外,P_SAH 的平均火用效率约为 34.7%,高于 F_SAH。此外,P_SAH 的能量回报时间(EPBT)低于 F_SAH,而 P_SAH 的嵌入能量较高。研究结果表明,在 SP 气流模式下,F_SAH 的能量成本最高(0.0427 美元/千瓦时),而在 2/3 DP 气流模式下,P_SAH 的能量成本最低(0.037 美元/千瓦时)。最后,与 F_SAH 相比,从火用经济和环境经济的角度来看,提出的 P_SAH 系统似乎更可行。