Dunne Ross A, Aarsland Dag, O'Brien John T, Ballard Clive, Banerjee Sube, Fox Nick C, Isaacs Jeremy D, Underwood Benjamin R, Perry Richard J, Chan Dennis, Dening Tom, Thomas Alan J, Schryer Jeffrey, Jones Anne-Marie, Evans Alison R, Alessi Charles, Coulthard Elizabeth J, Pickett James, Elton Peter, Jones Roy W, Mitchell Susan, Hooper Nigel, Kalafatis Chris, Rasmussen Jill G C, Martin Helen, Schott Jonathan M, Burns Alistair
Greater Manchester Dementia Research Centre, Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Rawnsley Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL,UK.
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK.
Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):72-80. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa228.
Given considerable variation in diagnostic and therapeutic practice, there is a need for national guidance on the use of neuroimaging, fluid biomarkers, cognitive testing, follow-up and diagnostic terminology in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MCI is a heterogenous clinical syndrome reflecting a change in cognitive function and deficits on neuropsychological testing but relatively intact activities of daily living. MCI is a risk state for further cognitive and functional decline with 5-15% of people developing dementia per year. However, ~50% remain stable at 5 years and in a minority, symptoms resolve over time. There is considerable debate about whether MCI is a useful clinical diagnosis, or whether the use of the term prevents proper inquiry (by history, examination and investigations) into underlying causes of cognitive symptoms, which can include prodromal neurodegenerative disease, other physical or psychiatric illness, or combinations thereof. Cognitive testing, neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers can improve the sensitivity and specificity of aetiological diagnosis, with growing evidence that these may also help guide prognosis. Diagnostic criteria allow for a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease to be made where MCI is accompanied by appropriate biomarker changes, but in practice, such biomarkers are not available in routine clinical practice in the UK. This would change if disease-modifying therapies became available and required a definitive diagnosis but would present major challenges to the National Health Service and similar health systems. Significantly increased investment would be required in training, infrastructure and provision of fluid biomarkers and neuroimaging. Statistical techniques combining markers may provide greater sensitivity and specificity than any single disease marker but their practical usefulness will depend on large-scale studies to ensure ecological validity and that multiple measures, e.g. both cognitive tests and biomarkers, are widely available for clinical use. To perform such large studies, we must increase research participation amongst those with MCI.
鉴于诊断和治疗实践存在很大差异,因此需要针对轻度认知障碍(MCI)中神经影像学、体液生物标志物、认知测试、随访及诊断术语的使用制定国家指南。MCI是一种异质性临床综合征,反映了认知功能的变化以及神经心理学测试中的缺陷,但日常生活活动相对完好。MCI是进一步认知和功能衰退的风险状态,每年有5%至15%的人会发展为痴呆症。然而,约50%的人在5年内保持稳定,少数人的症状会随时间消失。关于MCI是否是一个有用的临床诊断,或者使用该术语是否会妨碍对认知症状潜在原因(包括前驱神经退行性疾病、其他身体或精神疾病或其组合)进行适当的询问(通过病史、检查和调查),存在相当大的争议。认知测试、神经影像学和体液生物标志物可以提高病因诊断的敏感性和特异性,越来越多的证据表明这些方法也可能有助于指导预后。诊断标准允许在MCI伴有适当生物标志物变化时做出阿尔茨海默病的诊断,但在实践中,此类生物标志物在英国的常规临床实践中无法获得。如果有疾病修饰疗法可用且需要明确诊断,这种情况将会改变,但这将给国民医疗服务体系及类似的卫生系统带来重大挑战。在培训、基础设施以及体液生物标志物和神经影像学的提供方面将需要大幅增加投资。结合多种标志物的统计技术可能比任何单一疾病标志物具有更高的敏感性和特异性,但其实际效用将取决于大规模研究,以确保生态学有效性,并且多种测量方法(例如认知测试和生物标志物)可广泛用于临床。为了开展此类大型研究,我们必须提高MCI患者的研究参与度。