Suppr超能文献

双极经尿道前列腺切除术与单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗中-大体积前列腺增生的安全性和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate in the Treatment of Moderate-Large Volume Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Department of Urology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):663-673. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0840. Epub 2020 Dec 28.

Abstract

To compare outcomes of monopolar bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the management of exclusively moderate-large volume prostatic hyperplasia in terms of maximum flow rate as a surrogate for clinical efficacy, duration of catheterization, hospital stay, operative time, resection weight, transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome, acute urinary retention (AUR), clot retention, and blood transfusion. We conducted a search of electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and CENTRAL), identifying studies comparing the outcomes of monopolar and bipolar TURP in the management of large-volume prostatic hyperplasia. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for observational studies were used to assess included studies. Random effects modeling was used to calculate pooled outcome data. Three RCTs and four observational studies were identified, enrolling 496 patients. No difference was observed in the clinical efficacy between each procedure at 3 months postoperatively ( = 0.99), 6 months ( = 0.46), and 12 months ( = 0.29). The use of bipolar TURP was associated with significantly shorter inpatient stay ( = 0.01) and a shorter duration of catheterization ( = 0.05). Monopolar TURP was associated with an increased risk of TUR syndrome ( = 0.03). Operative time ( = 0.58), resection weight ( = 0.16), AUR ( = 0.96), clot retention ( = 0.79), and blood transfusion ( = 0.39) were similar in both groups. Our meta-analysis demonstrated that bipolar TURP in the treatment of moderate-large volume prostatic disease may be associated with a significantly lower rate of TUR syndrome and shortened length of hospital stay, with similar efficacy when compared with monopolar TURP. Further high-quality RCTs with adequate sample sizes are required to compare both monopolar and bipolar TURP to open prostatectomy or laser enucleation in the treatment of exclusively large-volume prostates with stricter definition of size.

摘要

为了比较单极和双极经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)在单纯大体积前列腺增生症治疗中的疗效,以最大尿流率为替代指标,比较导管插入时间、住院时间、手术时间、切除重量、经尿道前列腺切除术(TUR)综合征、急性尿潴留(AUR)、血块滞留和输血等指标。我们对电子数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 CENTRAL)进行了检索,以确定比较单极和双极 TURP 治疗大体积前列腺增生症的研究。采用 Cochrane 随机对照试验(RCT)风险偏倚工具和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对纳入的研究进行评估。采用随机效应模型计算汇总的结果数据。共纳入 3 项 RCT 和 4 项观察性研究,共 496 例患者。术后 3 个月( = 0.99)、6 个月( = 0.46)和 12 个月( = 0.29)时,两种手术方式的临床疗效无差异。与单极 TURP 相比,双极 TURP 可显著缩短住院时间( = 0.01)和导管插入时间( = 0.05)。单极 TURP 与 TUR 综合征风险增加相关( = 0.03)。手术时间( = 0.58)、切除重量( = 0.16)、AUR( = 0.96)、血块滞留( = 0.79)和输血( = 0.39)在两组间相似。我们的荟萃分析表明,双极 TURP 治疗中-大体积前列腺疾病可能与 TUR 综合征发生率显著降低和住院时间缩短相关,与单极 TURP 相比,疗效相似。需要进一步开展高质量的 RCT,以比较单极和双极 TURP 与开放性前列腺切除术或激光前列腺切除术在严格定义大体积前列腺时治疗单纯大体积前列腺的效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验