International Centre for Ecohydraulics Research, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Boldrewood Innovation Campus, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 7QF, UK.
International Centre for Ecohydraulics Research, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Boldrewood Innovation Campus, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 7QF, UK.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Feb 1;279:110908. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110908. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
River managers are challenged to address two key threats to freshwater biodiversity. The first is the effects of habitat fragmentation by instream structures, such as dams and weirs, that disrupt migrations and impact species distributions. The second is the impact of non-native species on native species and ecological processes. However, mitigating anthropogenic habitat fragmentation through the installation of passage facilities can facilitate the invasion and spread of non-native species. This study compared the potential of two existing low-cost fish passage technologies designed for sloping weirs, a cylindrical bristle cluster (CBC) array and horizontally oriented studded tiles, to facilitate upstream movement of native European fish while preventing dispersal of non-native American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus); thus providing a selective fish passage solution. Crayfish movement and passage was experimentally quantified at a Crump weir installed in a recirculating flume under two velocity regimes (low and high), without (control) and with the addition of either a CBC array or studded tiles. Results were compared to passage efficacy (PE) data for native fish species for both technologies (existing data). Most (84.4%) crayfish were active during the trials, exhibiting frequent up and downstream movements below the weir. During control conditions under the high velocity regime, high velocities (ca. 2.39 m s) prevented crayfish reaching the foot of the weir (PE: 0%). Under the low velocity regime, relatively low velocities (ca. 0.74 m s) at the weir crest prevented most crayfish from passing (PE: 10-16%). Crayfish movement speed and total distance moved were lower under the high than the low velocity regime. Neither fish pass technology improved crayfish maximum distance of ascent on the downstream weir face or PE under either velocity regime. Under comparable conditions to the high velocity regime tested here, previous studies have shown both technologies improve PE for native fish. Hence, both CBC arrays and studded tiles would likely function as suitable selective fish passes where the conservation objective is not to aid the spread of non-native crayfish. Additional passage inhibiting technologies will be required at sites where complete blockage of crayfish movement is required.
河流管理者面临着两个关键的淡水生物多样性威胁。第一个是由坝和堰等内部结构造成的生境破碎化的影响,这些结构破坏了迁徙并影响了物种分布。第二个是外来物种对本地物种和生态过程的影响。然而,通过安装通道设施来减轻人为生境破碎化的影响可能会促进外来物种的入侵和传播。本研究比较了两种现有的低成本鱼类通道技术在倾斜堰上的应用潜力,这两种技术分别是圆柱形刚毛簇(CBC)阵列和水平方向的钉状瓷砖,以促进本地欧洲鱼类的上游移动,同时防止非本地美洲信号小龙虾(Pacifastacus leniusculus)的扩散;从而提供了一种选择性的鱼类通道解决方案。在一个循环水槽中安装的 Crump 堰上,在两种流速(低和高)下,实验量化了小龙虾的移动和通过情况(无控制条件和添加 CBC 阵列或钉状瓷砖)。将结果与两种技术(现有数据)的本地鱼类物种的通道效率(PE)数据进行了比较。在试验期间,大多数(84.4%)小龙虾是活跃的,经常在堰下上下游移动。在高流速条件下的无控制条件下,高流速(约 2.39 m/s)阻止了小龙虾到达堰脚(PE:0%)。在低流速条件下,由于堰顶的相对较低的流速(约 0.74 m/s),大多数小龙虾无法通过(PE:10-16%)。在高流速条件下,小龙虾的移动速度和总移动距离都低于低流速条件。在两种流速条件下,这两种鱼类通道技术都没有提高小龙虾在下游堰面上的最大上升距离或 PE。在与本文测试的高流速条件相当的条件下,先前的研究表明,这两种技术都提高了本地鱼类的 PE。因此,在不希望促进外来小龙虾传播的保护目标下,CBC 阵列和钉状瓷砖都可能成为合适的选择性鱼类通道。在需要完全阻止小龙虾移动的地方,还需要额外的通道抑制技术。