Hjortdahl Magnus, Gyrd-Hansen Dorte, Halvorsen Peder A
Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Faculty of Health Sciences, Tromsø, Norway
Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
BJGP Open. 2021 Feb 23;5(1). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101153. Print 2021 Jan.
GPs use their judgement on whether to participate in emergencies; however, little is known about how GPs make their decisions on emergency participation.
To test whether GPs' participation in emergencies is associated with cause of symptoms, distance to the patient, other patients waiting, and out-of-hours (OOH) clinic characteristics.
DESIGN & SETTING: An online survey was sent to all GPs in Norway ( = 4701).
GPs were randomised to vignettes describing a patient with acute shortness of breath and asked whether they would participate in a callout. The vignettes varied with respect to cause of symptoms (trauma versus illness), distance to the patient (15 minutes versus 45 minutes), and other patients waiting at the OOH clinic (crowding versus no crowding). The survey included questions about OOH clinic characteristics.
Of the 1013 GPs (22%) who responded, 76% reported that they would participate. The proportion was higher in trauma (83% versus 69%, χ 24.8, <0.001), short distances (80% versus 71%, χ 9.5, =0.002), and no crowding (81% versus 70% χ 14.6, <0.001). Participation was associated with availability of a manned-response vehicle (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.25 to 3.41), and team training at the OOH clinic once a year (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.12 to 2.82) or more than once a year (OR = 3.78, 95% CI = 1.64 to 8.68).
GPs were less likely to participate in emergencies when the incident was not owing to trauma, was far away, and when other patients were waiting. A manned-response vehicle and regular team training were associated with increased participation.
全科医生运用自身判断力来决定是否参与急救;然而,对于全科医生如何做出参与急救的决策,我们知之甚少。
检验全科医生参与急救是否与症状原因、与患者的距离、其他候诊患者以及非工作时间(OOH)诊所的特征有关。
向挪威所有的全科医生(n = 4701)发送了一份在线调查问卷。
将全科医生随机分配到描述一名急性呼吸急促患者的情景描述中,并询问他们是否会参与出诊。这些情景描述在症状原因(创伤与疾病)、与患者的距离(15分钟与45分钟)以及OOH诊所其他候诊患者(拥挤与不拥挤)方面有所不同。该调查还包括有关OOH诊所特征的问题。
在1013名做出回应的全科医生(22%)中,76%报告称他们会参与。在创伤情况(83%对69%,χ² = 4.8,P < 0.001)、距离较短(80%对71%,χ² = 9.5,P = 0.002)以及不拥挤(81%对70%,χ² = 14.6,P < 0.001)时,这一比例更高。参与情况与配备专人响应车辆(调整后的优势比[OR]为2.06,95%置信区间[CI] = 1.25至3.41)以及OOH诊所每年进行一次团队培训(OR = 1.78,95%CI = 1.12至2.82)或每年多次团队培训(OR = 3.78,95%CI = 1.64至8.68)有关。
当事件并非由创伤引起、距离较远以及有其他患者候诊时,全科医生参与急救的可能性较小。配备专人响应车辆和定期进行团队培训与参与度的提高有关。