Suppr超能文献

研究前功能测试(TOPF)在预测澳大利亚样本韦氏智力测验精简版-第二版(WASI-II)分数中的作用。

Investigating the Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF) in predicting Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence - Second edition (WASI-II) scores in an Australian sample.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.

Marathon Health, Bathurst, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2022 Jul;32(6):847-871. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1842213. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of premorbid functioning is important in neuropsychological assessment. We aimed to investigate the predictive accuracy of the TOPF and examine this word list at an item level against WASI-II scores, using Australian pronunciations. The sample of 219 healthy Australians were aged 18-82 years. Multiple regression analyses were used to replicate the TOPF and simple demographic models based on the US TOPF standardization. Rasch analyses provided a comparison of Australian, US and UK word order from the proportion of words pronounced correctly. The variance explained in WASI-II index scores ranged from R=.12 (PRI) to .33 (FSIQ-2), which was approximately half that reported in the US standardization study. The accuracy of predicted WASI-II scores was also slightly less in our sample. Thirty-two words were out of place by five places or more compared with the US word order and 30 compared with the UK. These results add to concerns about the application the TOPF with norms developed in the US and UK in the Australian context. Clinicians are advised not to apply the five error discontinue rule when using the TOPF in the local context. Development of a more accurate word reading task for use in Australia is warranted.

摘要

准确预测发病前的功能对于神经心理学评估很重要。我们旨在研究 TOPF 的预测准确性,并使用澳大利亚发音,在项目级别上对该单词列表与 WASI-II 分数进行检验。该样本包括 219 名年龄在 18-82 岁的健康澳大利亚人。我们使用了多元回归分析来复制基于美国 TOPF 标准化的 TOPF 和简单的人口统计学模型。Rasch 分析提供了澳大利亚、美国和英国单词顺序的比较,比较的依据是正确发音的单词比例。WASI-II 指数得分的解释方差范围从 R=.12(PRI)到.33(FSIQ-2),大约是美国标准化研究报告的一半。在我们的样本中,预测 WASI-II 分数的准确性也略低。与美国单词顺序相比,有 32 个单词的位置相差 5 个或更多,与英国单词顺序相比则有 30 个。这些结果增加了对在澳大利亚背景下使用在美国和英国制定的标准的 TOPF 的应用的担忧。建议临床医生在当地使用 TOPF 时不要应用五个错误中断规则。有必要为澳大利亚开发更准确的单词阅读任务。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验