• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的中国大陆临床癌症研究出版物趋势分析:文献计量学研究

Analysis of the Trends in Publications on Clinical Cancer Research in Mainland China from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database: Bibliometric Study.

作者信息

Lin Min-Qiang, Lian Chen-Lu, Zhou Ping, Lei Jian, Wang Jun, Hua Li, Zhou Juan, Wu San-Gang

机构信息

Department of Scientific Management, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Nov 17;8(11):e21931. doi: 10.2196/21931.

DOI:10.2196/21931
PMID:33200992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7708086/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The application of China's big data sector in cancer research is just the beginning. In recent decades, more and more Chinese scholars have used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for clinical cancer research. A comprehensive bibliometric study is required to analyze the tendency of Chinese scholars to utilize the SEER database for clinical cancer research and provide a reference for the future of big data analytics.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to assess the trend of publications on clinical cancer research in mainland China from the SEER database.

METHODS

We performed a PubMed search to identify papers published with data from the SEER database in mainland China until August 31, 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 1566 papers utilizing the SEER database that were authored by investigators in mainland China were identified. Over the past years, significant growth in studies based on the SEER database was observed (P<.001). The top 5 research topics were breast cancer (213/1566, 13.6%), followed by colorectal cancer (185/1566, 11.8%), lung cancer (179/1566, 11.4%), gastrointestinal cancer (excluding colorectal cancer; 149/1566, 9.5%), and genital system cancer (93/1566, 5.9%). Approximately 75.2% (1178/1566) of papers were published from the eastern coastal region of China, and Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (Shanghai, China) was the most active organization. Overall, 267 journals were analyzed in this study, of which Oncotarget was the most contributing journal (136/267, 50.9%). Of the 1566 papers studied, 585 (37.4%) were published in the second quartile, 489 (31.2%) in the third quartile, 312 (19.9%) in the first quartile, and 80 (5.1%) in the fourth quartile, with 100 (6.4%) having an unknown Journal Citation Reports ranking.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical cancer research based on the SEER database in mainland China underwent constant and rapid growth during recent years. High-quality and comprehensive cancer databases based on Chinese demographic data are urgently needed.

摘要

背景

中国大数据领域在癌症研究中的应用尚处于起步阶段。近几十年来,越来越多的中国学者使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库进行临床癌症研究。需要进行一项全面的文献计量学研究,以分析中国学者利用SEER数据库进行临床癌症研究时的趋势,并为未来的大数据分析提供参考。

目的

我们的研究旨在评估中国大陆利用SEER数据库发表的临床癌症研究的趋势。

方法

我们在PubMed上进行检索,以识别截至2020年8月31日在中国大陆发表的使用SEER数据库数据的论文。

结果

共识别出1566篇由中国大陆研究人员撰写的利用SEER数据库的论文。在过去几年中,观察到基于SEER数据库的研究显著增长(P<0.001)。排名前5的研究主题是乳腺癌(213/1566,13.6%),其次是结直肠癌(185/1566,11.8%)、肺癌(179/1566,11.4%)、胃肠道癌(不包括结直肠癌;149/1566,9.5%)和生殖系统癌(93/1566,5.9%)。约75.2%(1178/1566)的论文发表于中国东部沿海地区,复旦大学附属肿瘤医院(中国上海)是最活跃的机构。总体而言,本研究分析了267种期刊,其中《Oncotarget》是贡献最大的期刊(136/267,50.9%)。在研究的1566篇论文中,585篇(37.4%)发表在第二四分位数区间,489篇(31.2%)发表在第三四分位数区间,312篇(19.9%)发表在第一四分位数区间,80篇(5.1%)发表在第四四分位数区间,100篇(6.4%)的期刊引用报告排名未知。

结论

近年来,中国大陆基于SEER数据库的临床癌症研究持续快速增长。迫切需要基于中国人口数据的高质量综合性癌症数据库。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/169a66c33bbc/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/138877df986a/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/cd2b00b3f114/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/464f759b6cff/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/dd2ae3d36ca3/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/0f013c0a4e2c/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/bf6b9668639c/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/169a66c33bbc/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/138877df986a/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/cd2b00b3f114/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/464f759b6cff/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/dd2ae3d36ca3/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/0f013c0a4e2c/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/bf6b9668639c/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7902/7708086/169a66c33bbc/medinform_v8i11e21931_fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of the Trends in Publications on Clinical Cancer Research in Mainland China from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database: Bibliometric Study.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的中国大陆临床癌症研究出版物趋势分析:文献计量学研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Nov 17;8(11):e21931. doi: 10.2196/21931.
2
Scientific publications in anesthesiology journals from mainland China, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: a 10-year survey of the literature.中国大陆、台湾和香港地区麻醉学期刊的科学出版物:文献 10 年调查。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Mar 1;110(3):918-21. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c793ee. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
3
[Bibliometric analysis of scientific articles on epidemiological study of burns in China].[中国烧伤流行病学研究科学论文的文献计量学分析]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2017 Apr 20;33(4):233-237. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2017.04.009.
4
Scientific publication in obstetrics and gynecology from Mainland China and other top-ranking countries: A 10-year survey of the literature.中国大陆及其他一流国家妇产科领域的科学出版物:一项为期10年的文献调查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 Mar;45(3):695-704. doi: 10.1111/jog.13849. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
5
[Bibliometric analysis of scientific articles on evidence-based nursing of burn in the mainland of China].[中国大陆烧伤循证护理科研论文的文献计量学分析]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 20;32(7):442-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2016.07.016.
6
Evaluating the outcomes of medical informatics development as a discipline in China: A publication perspective.评价医学信息学作为一门学科在中国的发展成果:基于发表文献的视角。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Oct;164:75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
7
Assessing the evolution of scientific publications in orthopedics journals from mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan: a 12-year survey of the literature.评估中国大陆、香港和台湾地区骨科期刊科学出版物的发展:一项为期12年的文献调查。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Jun 17;11(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0404-z.
8
Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications in transplantation journals from Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan between 2006 and 2015.2006 年至 2015 年间中国大陆、日本、韩国和中国台湾地区移植学杂志的科学出版物的文献计量分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 3;6(8):e011623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011623.
9
China's growing contribution to global intracranial aneurysm research (1991-2012): a bibliometric study.中国对全球颅内动脉瘤研究的贡献增长(1991 - 2012年):一项文献计量学研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 12;9(3):e91594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091594. eCollection 2014.
10
International publication trends and collaboration performance of China in healthcare science and services research.中国在医疗科学与服务研究方面的国际出版趋势及合作表现
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Jan 29;5:1. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0061-z. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of sex on disease stage and survival after radical cystectomy: a population-based analysis.性别对根治性膀胱切除术后疾病分期和生存的影响:一项基于人群的分析。
Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;39(4):236.e1-236.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
2
Development of an Individualized Prediction Calculator for the Benefit of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Patients with Surgically Resected De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer.为接受手术切除的初治IV期乳腺癌患者术后放疗获益开发个体化预测计算器
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jul 29;12(8):2103. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082103.
3
Impact of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy on invasive lobular carcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis of SEER data.
新辅助化疗和辅助化疗对浸润性小叶癌的影响:SEER 数据的倾向评分匹配分析。
Breast J. 2020 Sep;26(9):1765-1770. doi: 10.1111/tbj.13884. Epub 2020 May 25.
4
Population-based SEER analysis of survival in colorectal cancer patients with or without resection of lung and liver metastases.基于人群的 SEER 分析显示,结直肠癌患者行或不行肺及肝转移灶切除术的生存情况。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 23;20(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6710-1.
5
Validating the ACOSOG Z0011 Trial Result: A Population-Based Study Using the SEER Database.验证美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组(ACOSOG)Z0011试验结果:一项使用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的基于人群的研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Apr 11;12(4):950. doi: 10.3390/cancers12040950.
6
Impact of Sociodemographic Characteristics on the Quality of Care in the Surgical Management of Endometrial Cancer: An Analysis of a National Database in the United States.社会人口学特征对子宫内膜癌手术治疗质量的影响:对美国国家数据库的分析。
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(3):222-228. doi: 10.1159/000506048. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
Lymph node metastasis probability in young patients eligible for conservative management of endometrial cancer.年轻患者有资格行保守治疗的子宫内膜癌的淋巴结转移概率。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):131-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
AJCC 8th edition prognostic staging provides no better discriminatory ability in prognosis than anatomical staging in triple negative breast cancer.AJCC 8th 版预后分期在三阴性乳腺癌中的预后判别能力并不优于解剖分期。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6494-3.
9
Pyrotinib or Lapatinib Combined With Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer With Prior Taxanes, Anthracyclines, and/or Trastuzumab: A Randomized, Phase II Study.吡咯替尼或拉帕替尼联合卡培他滨治疗既往接受紫杉类、蒽环类和/或曲妥珠单抗治疗的 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌:一项随机、Ⅱ期研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 10;37(29):2610-2619. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00108. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
10
5-year overall survival in patients with lung cancer eligible or ineligible for screening according to US Preventive Services Task Force criteria: a prospective, observational cohort study.根据美国预防服务工作组标准,适合或不适合肺癌筛查患者的 5 年总生存率:一项前瞻性、观察性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Aug;20(8):1098-1108. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30329-8. Epub 2019 Jun 26.