• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜黏膜切除术治疗早期食管癌有效且安全,但需要持续监测。

Endoscopic mucosal resection for early esophageal carcinoma is effective and safe but necessitates continued surveillance.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;39(5):487-494. doi: 10.1007/s12664-020-01084-1. Epub 2020 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1007/s12664-020-01084-1
PMID:33201442
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is used for the treatment of early esophageal cancer (EEC).

METHODS

This a retrospective study aimed to study the efficacy, safety, and the recurrence rate of EEC following EMR.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients who had undergone EMR for early EEC (T1a andT1b lesions) from 2006 to 2015 were included. EMR alone was considered curative in 51 patients who had T1a lesion. Complete remission was achieved in 50 (98%) patients. Mean number of sessions of EMR was 1.14. Cancer recurred locally in 6 (12%) of 50 patients at a median follow-up of 48 (18-72) months. Endoscopic treatment alone achieved complete remission at last follow up in 47 of 50 patients (94%) who had initial EMR with complete remission, or in 47 of all 51 patients (92%) in whom EMR was considered curative for EC. The Kaplan-Meier cancer-free survival following complete remission with EMR was 94.2% at 1 year and 88.4% at 5 years. Patients with complete eradication of Barrett's had lower risk of recurrence of adenocarcinoma (AC) compared with patients who had persistent Barrett's (p = 0.01). EMR alone was not considered curative in 19 patients, 16 with T1b AC and 3 with T1a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) invading the muscularis mucosa (m3). Two major adverse events were noted: delayed bleeding requiring hospitalization, and perforation that was closed endoscopically.

CONCLUSION

EMR is effective and safe for the management of early EC. The risk of cancer recurrence, albeit small, warrants surveillance. Complete eradication of Barrett's should be attempted in all patients after EMR of AC.

摘要

背景

内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)用于治疗早期食管癌(EEC)。

方法

这是一项回顾性研究,旨在研究 EMR 治疗早期 EEC 的疗效、安全性和复发率。

结果

2006 年至 2015 年期间,79 例早期 EEC(T1a 和 T1b 病变)患者接受了 EMR 治疗。51 例 T1a 病变患者的 EMR 单独治疗被认为是治愈性的。50 例(98%)患者完全缓解。EMR 的平均治疗次数为 1.14 次。在中位随访 48(18-72)个月时,50 例完全缓解的患者中有 6 例(12%)局部复发。在最初 EMR 完全缓解的 50 例患者中的 47 例(94%)或在所有 51 例 EMR 被认为可治愈的 EC 患者中的 47 例中,单独进行内镜治疗最终完全缓解。EMR 完全缓解后的无癌生存率在 1 年时为 94.2%,在 5 年时为 88.4%。与 Barrett 持续存在的患者相比,Barrett 完全消除的患者腺癌(AC)复发的风险较低(p = 0.01)。19 例患者 EMR 单独治疗不能治愈,其中 16 例为 T1b AC,3 例为 T1a 鳞状细胞癌(SCC)侵犯黏膜肌层(m3)。注意到 2 例主要不良事件:需要住院治疗的延迟性出血和内镜下闭合的穿孔。

结论

EMR 是治疗早期 EC 的有效且安全的方法。尽管复发风险很小,但仍需要进行监测。在 AC 的 EMR 后,应尝试在所有患者中彻底消除 Barrett。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic mucosal resection for early esophageal carcinoma is effective and safe but necessitates continued surveillance.内镜黏膜切除术治疗早期食管癌有效且安全,但需要持续监测。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;39(5):487-494. doi: 10.1007/s12664-020-01084-1. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
2
Endoscopic Treatment of Early Barrett's Adenocarcinoma and Dysplasia: Focus on Submucosal Cancer.早期 Barrett 腺癌和异型增生的内镜治疗:关注黏膜下癌。
Digestion. 2019;99(4):293-300. doi: 10.1159/000492217. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
3
Complete Barrett's eradication endoscopic mucosal resection: an effective treatment modality for high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma--an American single-center experience.完全性巴雷特食管根除性内镜黏膜切除术:治疗高级别异型增生和黏膜内癌的有效治疗方式——一项美国单中心经验
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;104(11):2684-92. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.465. Epub 2009 Aug 18.
4
Long-term follow-up of complete Barrett's eradication endoscopic mucosal resection (CBE-EMR) for the treatment of high grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma.内镜黏膜切除术实现完全巴雷特食管消除(CBE-EMR)治疗高级别异型增生和黏膜内癌的长期随访
Endoscopy. 2007 Dec;39(12):1086-91. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966788. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
5
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Endoscopic Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia and/or Early Cancer: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:内镜治疗伴异型增生和/或早期癌症的 Barrett 食管:专家综述。
Gastroenterology. 2020 Feb;158(3):760-769. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.051. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
6
Endoscopic mucosal resection versus esophagectomy for intramucosal adenocarcinoma in the setting of barrett's esophagus.内镜下黏膜切除术与食管切除术治疗 Barrett 食管黏膜内腺癌。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4211-4216. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5479-z. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
7
Advanced pathology under squamous epithelium on initial EMR specimens in patients with Barrett's esophagus and high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma: implications for surveillance and endotherapy management.巴雷特食管合并高级别异型增生或黏膜内癌患者初次内镜黏膜切除术标本中鳞状上皮下的高级病理学表现:对监测和内镜治疗管理的意义
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Sep;70(3):417-21. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.047. Epub 2009 Jun 24.
8
Ten-year follow-up of endoscopic mucosal resection versus esophagectomy for esophageal intramucosal adenocarcinoma in the setting of Barrett's esophagus: a Canadian experience.内镜黏膜切除术与食管切除术治疗 Barrett 食管黏膜内腺癌的 10 年随访:加拿大的经验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8735-8741. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10318-0. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
9
A randomised trial of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for early Barrett's neoplasia.早期巴雷特肿瘤内镜下黏膜下剥离术与内镜下黏膜切除术的随机试验
Gut. 2017 May;66(5):783-793. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310126. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
10
EUS followed by EMR for staging of high-grade dysplasia and early cancer in Barrett's esophagus.超声内镜引导下黏膜切除术用于巴雷特食管高级别异型增生和早期癌的分期
Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Jul;62(1):16-23. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)00319-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Esophageal Cancer in a Regionalized Care System in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省区域性照护体系中食管癌的诊断、治疗和结局的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126090. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26090.