• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用国家创伤数据库(NTDB)和机器学习预测入院创伤患者的死亡率。

Using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and machine learning to predict trauma patient mortality at admission.

机构信息

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Institute for Medicine and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Department of Trauma Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Nov 17;15(11):e0242166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242166. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0242166
PMID:33201935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7671512/
Abstract

A 400-estimator gradient boosting classifier was trained to predict survival probabilities of trauma patients. The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) provided 799233 complete patient records (778303 survivors and 20930 deaths) each containing 32 features, a number further reduced to only 8 features via the permutation importance method. Importantly, the 8 features can all be readily determined at admission: systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, oxygen saturation, gender, age and Glasgow coma score. Since death was rare, a rebalanced training set was used to train the model. The model is able to predict a survival probability for any trauma patient and accurately distinguish between a deceased and survived patient in 92.4% of all cases. Partial dependence curves (Psurvival vs. feature value) obtained from the trained model revealed the global importance of Glasgow coma score, age, and systolic blood pressure while pulse rate, respiratory rate, temperature, oxygen saturation, and gender had more subtle single variable influences. Shapley values, which measure the relative contribution of each of the 8 features to individual patient risk, were computed for several patients and were able to quantify patient-specific warning signs. Using the NTDB to sample across numerous patient traumas and hospital protocols, the trained model and Shapley values rapidly provides quantitative insight into which combination of variables in an 8-dimensional space contributed most to each trauma patient's predicted global risk of death upon emergency room admission.

摘要

使用 400 个估计量的梯度提升分类器来预测创伤患者的生存概率。国家创伤数据库(NTDB)提供了 799233 份完整的患者记录(778303 名幸存者和 20930 名死亡者),每份记录包含 32 个特征,通过排列重要性方法进一步减少到只有 8 个特征。重要的是,这 8 个特征在入院时都可以很容易地确定:收缩压、心率、呼吸率、体温、血氧饱和度、性别、年龄和格拉斯哥昏迷评分。由于死亡人数较少,因此使用了再平衡的训练集来训练模型。该模型能够预测任何创伤患者的生存概率,并在 92.4%的情况下准确区分死亡和存活患者。从训练有素的模型中获得的部分依赖曲线(Psurvival 与特征值)显示了格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和收缩压的全局重要性,而脉搏率、呼吸率、体温、血氧饱和度和性别则具有更细微的单变量影响。Shapley 值用于衡量 8 个特征中的每一个对个体患者风险的相对贡献,为几个患者计算了 Shapley 值,并能够量化患者特定的警告信号。通过使用 NTDB 在多个患者创伤和医院协议中进行抽样,训练有素的模型和 Shapley 值可以快速提供有关 8 维空间中哪些变量组合对每个创伤患者急诊入院时的全球死亡风险预测贡献最大的定量见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/25019c300deb/pone.0242166.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/0be13033b905/pone.0242166.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/fb5d0bfe6142/pone.0242166.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/d325783cd9e3/pone.0242166.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/fccc86395238/pone.0242166.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/67d8c0dab1f9/pone.0242166.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/c2db03e8fd04/pone.0242166.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/25019c300deb/pone.0242166.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/0be13033b905/pone.0242166.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/fb5d0bfe6142/pone.0242166.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/d325783cd9e3/pone.0242166.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/fccc86395238/pone.0242166.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/67d8c0dab1f9/pone.0242166.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/c2db03e8fd04/pone.0242166.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b77/7671512/25019c300deb/pone.0242166.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and machine learning to predict trauma patient mortality at admission.利用国家创伤数据库(NTDB)和机器学习预测入院创伤患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 17;15(11):e0242166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242166. eCollection 2020.
2
The prediction of the survival in patients with severe trauma during prehospital care: Analyses based on NTDB database.严重创伤患者在院前急救期间的生存预测:基于 NTDB 数据库的分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1599-1609. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02484-0. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
3
Predicting hospital mortality among injured children using a national trauma database.利用国家创伤数据库预测受伤儿童的医院死亡率。
J Trauma. 2006 Apr;60(4):792-801. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000214589.02515.dd.
4
Predicting risk for trauma patients using static and dynamic information from the MIMIC III database.利用 MIMIC III 数据库中的静态和动态信息预测创伤患者的风险。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 19;17(1):e0262523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262523. eCollection 2022.
5
Improving the performance of the Revised Trauma Score using Shock Index, Peripheral Oxygen Saturation, and Temperature-a National Trauma Database study 2011 to 2015.利用休克指数、外周血氧饱和度和体温改良创伤评分的表现:一项 2011 至 2015 年国家创伤数据库研究
Surgery. 2020 May;167(5):821-828. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.12.003. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
6
ICD-10 based machine learning models outperform the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) in survival prediction.基于 ICD-10 的机器学习模型在生存预测方面优于创伤和损伤严重程度评分 (TRISS)。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0276624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276624. eCollection 2022.
7
Developing best practices to study trauma outcomes in large databases: an evidence-based approach to determine the best mortality risk adjustment model.制定研究大型数据库中创伤结局的最佳实践方法:一种基于证据的方法来确定最佳死亡率风险调整模型。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Apr;76(4):1061-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000182.
8
Revised trauma scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in the emergency department: Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score.改良创伤评分系统预测急诊科住院病死率:格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和收缩压评分。
Crit Care. 2011 Aug 10;15(4):R191. doi: 10.1186/cc10348.
9
Predicting outcomes after trauma: Prognostic model development based on admission features through machine learning.创伤后结局预测:基于机器学习的入院特征预后模型建立。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Dec 10;100(49):e27753. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027753.
10
[A new score system for prediction of death in patients with severe trauma: the value of death warning score].[一种用于预测严重创伤患者死亡的新评分系统:死亡预警评分的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Nov;27(11):890-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning-based prediction of mortality in pediatric trauma patients.基于机器学习的小儿创伤患者死亡率预测
Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 27;13:1522845. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1522845. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of clinical decision support for patients older than 65 years with fall-related TBI using artificial intelligence modeling.使用人工智能建模为65岁以上与跌倒相关的创伤性脑损伤患者开发临床决策支持系统。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 3;20(2):e0316462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316462. eCollection 2025.
3
Value of trauma registries in improving global trauma outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Elevated blood alcohol impacts hospital mortality following motorcycle injury: A National Trauma Data Bank analysis.血液酒精水平升高会影响摩托车事故后住院死亡率:国家创伤数据库分析。
Injury. 2020 Jan;51(1):91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
2
Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery.用于预防手术期间低氧血症的可解释机器学习预测。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;2(10):749-760. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
3
Coagulopathy implications using a multiscale model of traumatic bleeding matching macro- and microcirculation.
创伤登记系统在改善全球创伤治疗结果方面的价值。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jun 3;9(1):e001507. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001507. eCollection 2024.
4
Identifying Age-Specific Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes After Trauma With Machine Learning.运用机器学习识别创伤后不良结局的年龄特异性危险因素
J Surg Res. 2024 Apr;296:465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.12.016. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
5
An Artificial Intelligence Model for Predicting Trauma Mortality Among Emergency Department Patients in South Korea: Retrospective Cohort Study.一种用于预测韩国急诊科创伤患者死亡率的人工智能模型:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 29;25:e49283. doi: 10.2196/49283.
6
An efficient edge/cloud medical system for rapid detection of level of consciousness in emergency medicine based on explainable machine learning models.一种基于可解释机器学习模型的高效边缘/云医疗系统,用于在急诊医学中快速检测意识水平。
Neural Comput Appl. 2023;35(14):10695-10716. doi: 10.1007/s00521-023-08258-w. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
7
Science fiction or clinical reality: a review of the applications of artificial intelligence along the continuum of trauma care.科幻还是临床现实:创伤护理连续体中人工智能应用的综述。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Mar 6;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00469-1.
8
Artificial intelligence and machine learning for hemorrhagic trauma care.人工智能和机器学习在出血性创伤护理中的应用。
Mil Med Res. 2023 Feb 16;10(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40779-023-00444-0.
9
Decision support by machine learning systems for acute management of severely injured patients: A systematic review.机器学习系统用于严重创伤患者急性管理的决策支持:一项系统综述。
Front Surg. 2022 Oct 10;9:924810. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.924810. eCollection 2022.
10
Data Science Trends Relevant to Nursing Practice: A Rapid Review of the 2020 Literature.与护理实践相关的数据科学趋势:对 2020 年文献的快速回顾。
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Jan;13(1):161-179. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1742218. Epub 2022 Feb 9.
创伤性出血的多尺度模型匹配宏观和微循环的凝血功能障碍的影响。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2019 Jul 1;317(1):H73-H86. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00774.2018. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Identification and internal validation of models for predicting survival and ICU admission following a traumatic injury.创伤后生存和 ICU 收治预测模型的识别和内部验证。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Nov 12;26(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0563-5.
5
Multiscale systems biology of trauma-induced coagulopathy.创伤性凝血病的多尺度系统生物学。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2018 Jul;10(4):e1418. doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1418. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
6
Machine Learning for Predicting Outcomes in Trauma.机器学习在创伤预后预测中的应用。
Shock. 2017 Nov;48(5):504-510. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000898.
7
On-admission blood pressure and pulse rate in trauma patients and their correlation with mortality: Cushing's phenomenon revisited.创伤患者入院时的血压和脉搏率及其与死亡率的相关性:再探库欣现象
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017 Jan-Mar;7(1):14-17. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.201950.
8
The golden hour in trauma: dogma or medical folklore?创伤中的黄金一小时:是教条还是医学传说?
Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):525-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.043. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
9
Increasing trauma deaths in the United States.美国创伤死亡人数增加。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jul;260(1):13-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000600.
10
A computational model of hemorrhage and dehydration suggests a pathophysiological mechanism: Starling-mediated protein trapping.一种出血和脱水的计算模型表明了一种病理生理学机制:Starling 介导的蛋白截留。
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013 Feb 15;304(4):H620-31. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00621.2012. Epub 2012 Nov 30.