Suppr超能文献

DeBakeyⅢ型逆行性Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层的入口封堵策略疗效

Efficacy of entry exclusion strategy for DeBakey type III retrograde Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.

作者信息

Inoue Yosuke, Matsuda Hitoshi, Matsuo Jiro, Shijo Takayuki, Omura Atsushi, Seike Yoshimasa, Uehara Kyokun, Sasaki Hiroaki, Kobayashi Junjiro

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Nov 17. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa329.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Resection of a primary entry tear is essential for the treatment of Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAAD). In DeBakey type III retrograde AAAD (DBIII-RAAAD), resection of the primary entry tear in the descending aorta is sometimes difficult. The frozen elephant trunk technique and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) enable the closure of the primary entry in the descending aorta. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of resection or closure of primary entry, i.e. entry exclusion, in patients with DeBakey type III retrograde-AAAD.

METHODS

The medical records of 654 patients with AAAD who underwent emergency surgery between January 2000 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed, and 80 eligible patients with DeBakey type III retrograde-AAAD were divided into the excluded (n = 50; age, 62 ± 12 years) and residual (n = 30; age, 66 ± 14 years) groups according to postoperative computed tomography angiographic data of the false lumen around the primary entry. The excluded group was defined as having a postoperative false lumen at the level of the elephant trunk or thrombosis of the endograft including primary entry. Patients with early false lumen enhancement around the elephant trunk or an unresected primary entry tear after isolated hemiarch replacement were included in the residual group. The early and long-term surgical outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality rate was 8% (6/80), with no significant difference observed between the excluded and the residual groups (10% and 7%, respectively; P > 0.99). Ninety-five percentage of the patients (20/21) achieved entry exclusion with stent grafts including the frozen elephant trunk procedure and TEVAR. Spinal cord ischaemia was not observed in either group. The cumulative overall survival at 5 years was comparable between the 2 groups (76% and 81% in the excluded and residual groups, respectively; P = 0.93). The 5-year freedom from distal aortic reoperation rate was significantly higher in the excluded group (97%) than in the residual group (97% vs 66%; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Not only resection but also closure using the entry exclusion approach for DeBakey type III retrograde-AAAD utilizing new technologies including the frozen elephant trunk technique and TEVAR might mitigate dissection-related reoperations.

摘要

目的

切除原发性破口对于斯坦福A型急性主动脉夹层(AAAD)的治疗至关重要。在DeBakey III型逆行性AAAD(DBIII-RAAAD)中,降主动脉原发性破口的切除有时很困难。冷冻象鼻技术和胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)能够闭合降主动脉的原发性破口。本研究的目的是探讨在DeBakey III型逆行性AAAD患者中切除或闭合原发性破口(即破口排除)的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2000年1月至2019年3月期间接受急诊手术的654例AAAD患者的病历,根据原发性破口周围假腔的术后计算机断层扫描血管造影数据,将80例符合条件的DeBakey III型逆行性AAAD患者分为排除组(n = 50;年龄,62±12岁)和残留组(n = 30;年龄,66±14岁)。排除组定义为在象鼻水平有术后假腔或包括原发性破口在内的腔内移植物血栓形成。象鼻周围早期假腔强化或单纯半弓置换术后原发性破口未切除的患者纳入残留组。比较两组的早期和长期手术结果。

结果

住院死亡率为8%(6/80),排除组和残留组之间未观察到显著差异(分别为10%和7%;P>0.99)。95%的患者(20/21)通过包括冷冻象鼻技术和TEVAR在内的支架移植物实现了破口排除。两组均未观察到脊髓缺血。两组5年累计总生存率相当(排除组和残留组分别为76%和81%;P = 0.93)。排除组5年无远端主动脉再次手术率显著高于残留组(97%对66%;P = 0.008)。

结论

对于DeBakey III型逆行性AAAD,不仅切除原发性破口,而且使用包括冷冻象鼻技术和TEVAR在内的新技术通过破口排除方法进行闭合,可能会减少与夹层相关的再次手术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验